Stress responses in high-fidelity simulation among anesthesiology students

被引:7
|
作者
Stecz, Patryk [1 ]
Makara-Studzinska, Marta [2 ]
Bialka, Szymon [3 ]
Misiolek, Hanna [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lodz, Inst Psychol, Dept Clin Psychol & Psychopathol, Smugowa 10-12, PL-91433 Lodz, Poland
[2] Jagiellonian Univ, Coll Med, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Hlth Psychol, Kopernika 25, PL-31501 Krakow, Poland
[3] Med Univ Silesia, Fac Med Sci Zabrze, Dept Anaesthesiol Intens Care & Emergency Med, 3 Maja 13-15, PL-41800 Zabrze, Poland
关键词
MEDICAL-STUDENTS; TESTOSTERONE; PERFORMANCE; DISTRESS;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-021-96279-7
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Simulation sessions can produce high-fidelity emergency situations that facilitate the learning process. These sessions may also generate a complex stress response in the learners. This prospective observational study assessed psychological, physiological, immunological, and humoral levels of stress during high-fidelity simulation training. Fifty-six undergraduate medicine students who took part in a medical simulation session were assigned team roles (physician, nurse or assistant). Subsequently, each participant was assessed before the scenario (T-0), after the procedure (T-1), and two hours later (T-2). Psychological stress and anxiety were measured at T-0 and T-1, using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) and Dundee Stress State Questionnaire (DSSQ). Cortisol, testosterone, secretory immunoglobulin class A (sIgA), alpha-amylase, and oxygen saturation level were measured at T-0, T-1, and T-2, as was the physiological response indicated by heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP). It was found that the onset of task performance was related to increased anticipatory worry and higher oxygen saturation. The participants reported decreased worry, followed by increased emotional distress after the simulation training (T-1). Participants trait anxiety predicted the intensity of worry, distress and task engagement. In contrast, no clear relationships were found between trait anxiety and biological stress markers. Testosterone levels were growing significantly in each phase of measurement, while physiological responses (BP, HR) increased at T-1 and declined at T-2. The levels of stress markers varied depending on the assigned roles; however, the trajectories of responses were similar among all team members. No evidence for prolonged cortisol response (T-1, T-2) was found based on psychological stress at the onset of simulation (T-0). Regression analysis followed by receiver operating characteristics analyses showed uncertain evidence that initial state anxiety and worry predicted the levels of sIgA. Medical students are relatively resilient in terms of stress responses to medical simulation. The observed stress patterns and interrelationships between its psychological, physiological, hormonal, and immunological markers are discussed in accordance with theoretical concepts, previous research work, and further recommendations.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] High-fidelity is not superior to low-fidelity simulation but leads to overconfidence in medical students
    Christina Massoth
    Hannah Röder
    Hendrik Ohlenburg
    Michael Hessler
    Alexander Zarbock
    Daniel M. Pöpping
    Manuel Wenk
    BMC Medical Education, 19
  • [22] High-fidelity is not superior to low-fidelity simulation but leads to overconfidence in medical students
    Massoth, Christina
    Roeder, Hannah
    Ohlenburg, Hendrik
    Hessler, Michael
    Zarbock, Alexander
    Poepping, Daniel M.
    Wenk, Manuel
    BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2019, 19 (1)
  • [23] Anxiety and stress among anaesthesiology and critical care residents during high-fidelity simulation sessions
    Bauer, Christian
    Rimmele, Thomas
    Duclos, Antoine
    Prieto, Nathalie
    Cejka, Jean-Christophe
    Carry, Pierre-Yves
    Grousson, Sebastien
    Friggeri, Arnaud
    Secco, Julien
    Bui-Xuan, Bernard
    Lilot, Marc
    Lehot, Jean-Jacques
    ANAESTHESIA CRITICAL CARE & PAIN MEDICINE, 2016, 35 (06) : 383 - 392
  • [24] Using High-fidelity Simulation to Prepare Advanced Practice Nursing Students
    Mompoint-Williams, Darnell
    Brooks, Amy
    Lee, Loretta
    Watts, Penni
    Moss, Jacqueline
    CLINICAL SIMULATION IN NURSING, 2014, 10 (01) : E5 - E10
  • [25] High-fidelity simulation and virtual reality: an evaluation of medical students' experiences
    Macnamara, Alexandra Frances
    Bird, Katie
    Rigby, Alan
    Sathyapalan, Thozhukat
    Hepburn, David
    BMJ SIMULATION & TECHNOLOGY ENHANCED LEARNING, 2021, 7 (06): : 528 - 535
  • [26] Teamwork in Pediatric Resuscitation: Training Medical Students on High-Fidelity Simulation
    Goncalves, Beatriz Adriane Rodrigues
    de Melo, Maria do Carmo Barros
    Liu, Priscila Menezes Ferri
    Valente, Beatriz Cristina Heitmann Gomes
    Ribeiro, Vivian Paiva
    Vilaca e Silva, Pedro Henrique
    ADVANCES IN MEDICAL EDUCATION AND PRACTICE, 2022, 13 : 697 - 708
  • [27] Effects of high-fidelity simulation education on medical students' anxiety and confidence
    Yu, Ji Hye
    Chang, Hye Jin
    Kim, Soon Sun
    Park, Ji Eun
    Chung, Wou Young
    Lee, Su Kyung
    Kim, Miran
    Lee, Jang Hoon
    Jung, Yun Jung
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (05):
  • [28] Effect of High-Fidelity Simulation on Self-Satisfaction and Self-Confidence Among Nursing Students
    Toqan, Dalia
    Ayed, Ahmad
    Khalaf, Inaam A.
    Alsadi, Mohammad
    SAGE OPEN NURSING, 2023, 9
  • [29] Cognitive Load, Emotion, and Performance in High-Fidelity Simulation Among Beginning Nursing Students: A Pilot Study
    Schlairet, Maura C.
    Schlairet, Timothy James
    Sauls, Denise H.
    Bellflowers, Lois
    JOURNAL OF NURSING EDUCATION, 2015, 54 (03) : S5 - S11
  • [30] High-Fidelity ECMO Simulation Scenarios
    Puslecki, Mateusz
    Ligowski, Marcin
    Dabrowski, Marek
    Stefaniak, Sebastian
    Gasiorowski, Lukasz
    Dabrowska, Agata
    Klosiewicz, Tomasz
    Sip, Maciej
    Zielinski, Marcin
    Pawlak, Aleksander
    Sobczynski, Pawel
    Lukasik-Glebocka, Magdalena
    Karczewski, Marek
    Malkiewicz, Tomasz
    Artynska, Aniela
    Gezela, Mariusz
    Perek, Bartlomiej
    Ladzinska, Malgorzata
    Kiel, Michal
    Misterski, Marcin
    Buczkowski, Piotr
    Telec, Wojciech
    Czekajlo, Michael
    Jemielity, Marek
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2017, 19 : 61 - 61