Are family physicians appropriately screening for postpartum depression?

被引:51
|
作者
Seehusen, DA
Baldwin, LM
Runkle, GP
Clark, G
机构
[1] USA, Dept Family & Community Med, Eisenhower Army Med Ctr, Ft Gordon, GA 30905 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Family Med, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Madigan Army Med Ctr, Dept Family Med, Tacoma, WA 98431 USA
来源
关键词
D O I
10.3122/jabfm.18.2.104
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Despite the availability of screening tools for postpartum depression (PPD), there is a general consensus that the condition is underdiagnosed. This study was conducted to determine how frequently family physicians screen for PPD, what methods they use to screen, and what influences their screening frequency. Methods: A survey of members of the Washington Academy of Family Physicians was conducted. Three hundred sixty-two (60.9%) mailed surveys were returned. The 298 physicians who saw postpartum women and children younger than 1 year of age were included in the study. Results: Of the study population, 70.2% always or often screened for PPD at postpartum gynecologic examinations, and 46% always or often screened mothers at well-child visits. Of those who screened, 30.6% reported using a validated screening tool. Of those, only 18% used a tool specifically designed to screen for PPD. Logistic regression modeling showed that female sex [odds ratio (OR) = 2.2], training in PPD during residency (OR = 8.1), training in PPD through medical literature (OR = 2.1), and agreement that postpartum depression is common enough to warrant screening (OR = 1.9) were all significantly associated with more frequent screening at postpartum gynecologic visits. Agreement that screening takes too much effort was associated with less frequent screening (OR = 0.8). Conclusions: Although family physicians believe that PPD is serious, identifiable, and treatable; screening is not universal and use of screening tools designed for PPD is uncommon. Training in postpartum depression and female sex are the variables most strongly associated with frequent screening.
引用
收藏
页码:104 / 112
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Screening for and Treating Postpartum Depression in Family Medicine
    Yawn, Barbara
    Allen, Diertrich
    Wilson, Pace
    Peter, Wollan
    Debbie, Graham
    Susan, Bertram
    JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2011, 20 (03) : 501 - 501
  • [2] Postpartum depression screening by family nurse practitioners
    Goldsmith, Marla E.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF NURSE PRACTITIONERS, 2007, 19 (06): : 321 - 327
  • [3] SCREENING FOR DEPRESSION AMONG WOMEN ATTENDING THEIR FAMILY PHYSICIANS
    COSTELLO, CG
    DEVINS, GM
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF BEHAVIOURAL SCIENCE-REVUE CANADIENNE DES SCIENCES DU COMPORTEMENT, 1989, 21 (04): : 434 - 451
  • [4] Physicians' knowledge of postpartum depression
    Nguyen, M
    Goesert, D
    Frattarelli, L
    Thompson, D
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH, 2003, 55 (02) : 154 - 154
  • [5] Screening for postpartum depression in military women with the Postpartum Depression Screening Scale
    Rychnovsky, Jacqueline
    Beck, Cheryl Tatano
    MILITARY MEDICINE, 2006, 171 (11) : 1100 - 1104
  • [6] Examining the Screening Practices of Physicians for Postpartum Depression: Implications for Improving Health Outcomes
    Evans, Melissa Goldin
    Phillippi, Stephen
    Gee, Rebekah Elizabeth
    WOMENS HEALTH ISSUES, 2015, 25 (06) : 703 - 710
  • [7] Screening for postpartum depression
    De La Haye, W. G.
    Lowe, G. A.
    WEST INDIAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 55 (06): : 451 - 454
  • [8] Postpartum Depression Screening
    Hilt, Robert J.
    PEDIATRIC ANNALS, 2015, 44 (09): : 344 - 347
  • [9] Do family physicians request ultrasound scans appropriately?
    Landry, Bret A.
    Barnes, David
    Keough, Valerie
    Watson, Adrienne
    Rowe, Judy
    Mallory, Amy
    Abdolell, Mohamed
    CANADIAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 2011, 57 (08) : E299 - E304
  • [10] Perceived barriers to screening for parental depression among pediatricians and family physicians
    Stewart, GC
    Davis, MM
    PEDIATRIC RESEARCH, 2003, 53 (04) : 202A - 202A