RapidArc treatment verification in 3D using polymer gel dosimetry and Monte Carlo simulation

被引:42
作者
Ceberg, Sofie [1 ]
Gagne, Isabelle [2 ]
Gustafsson, Helen [1 ,3 ]
Scherman, Jonas Bengtsson [1 ,4 ]
Korreman, Stine S. [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Kjaer-Kristoffersen, Flemming [4 ]
Hilts, Michelle [2 ]
Back, Sven A. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Dept Med Radiat Phys, Skane Univ Hosp, Malmo, Sweden
[2] Vancouver Isl Ctr, BC Canc Agcy, Victoria, BC, Canada
[3] ACT Hlth, Dept Med Phys, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[4] Rigshosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
[5] Univ Copenhagen, Niels Bohr Inst, DK-1168 Copenhagen, Denmark
[6] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Human Oncol, Madison, WI 53706 USA
关键词
VOLUMETRIC MODULATED ARC; DOSE CALCULATIONS; PROSTATE RADIOTHERAPY; TREATMENT TIME; THERAPY VMAT; BEAM; IMRT; WATER; ALGORITHM; DELIVERY;
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/55/17/001
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to verify the advanced inhomogeneous dose distribution produced by a volumetric arc therapy technique (RapidArc (TM)) using 3D gel measurements and Monte Carlo (MC) simulations. The TPS (treatment planning system)-calculated dose distribution was compared with gel measurements and MC simulations, thus investigating any discrepancy between the planned dose delivery and the actual delivery. Additionally, the reproducibility of the delivery was investigated using repeated gel measurements. A prostate treatment plan was delivered to a 1.3 liter nPAG gel phantom using one single arc rotation and a target dose of 3.3 Gy. Magnetic resonance imaging of the gel was carried out using a 1.5 T scanner. The MC dose distributions were calculated using the VIMC-Arc code. The relative absorbed dose differences were calculated voxel-by-voxel, within the volume enclosed by the 90% isodose surface (VOI90), for the TPS versus gel and TPS versus MC. The differences between the verification methods, MC versus gel, and between two repeated gel measurements were investigated in the same way. For all volume comparisons, the mean value was within 1% and the standard deviation of the differences was within 2.5% (1SD). A 3D gamma analysis between the dose matrices were carried out using gamma criteria 3%/3 mm and 5%/5 mm (% dose difference and mm distance to agreement) within the volume enclosed by the 50% isodose surface (VOI50) and the 90% isodose surface (VOI90), respectively. All comparisons resulted in very high pass rates. More than 95% of the TPS points were within 3%/3 mm of both the gel measurement and MC simulation, both inside VOI50 and VOI90. Additionally, the repeated gel measurements showed excellent consistency, indicating reproducible delivery. Using MC simulations and gel measurements, this verification study successfully demonstrated that the RapidArc (TM) plan was both accurately calculated and delivered as planned.
引用
收藏
页码:4885 / 4898
页数:14
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) reduces treatment time compared to conventional IMRT (cIMRT) while maintaining similar plan quality in whole pelvic gynecologic radiotherapy [J].
Alexander, A. S. ;
Wells, D. ;
Berrang, T. ;
Parsons, C. ;
Mydin, A. ;
Shaffer, R. ;
Wong, F. ;
Sayers, D. ;
Otto, K. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2008, 72 (01) :S366-S366
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1999, 62 ICRU
[3]   Polymer gel dosimetry [J].
Baldock, C. ;
De Deene, Y. ;
Doran, S. ;
Ibbott, G. ;
Jirasek, A. ;
Lepage, M. ;
McAuley, K. B. ;
Oldham, M. ;
Schreiner, L. J. .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2010, 55 (05) :R1-R63
[4]   Liquid ionization chamber calibrated gel dosimetry in conformal stereotactic radiotherapy of brain lesions [J].
Bjoreland, Anders ;
Lindvall, Peter ;
Karlsson, Anna ;
Gustavsson, Helen ;
Back, Sven Aj ;
Karlsson, Mikael ;
Bergenheim, Tommy A. .
ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2008, 47 (06) :1099-1109
[5]   Monte Carlo simulation of RapidArc radiotherapy delivery [J].
Bush, K. ;
Townson, R. ;
Zavgorodni, S. .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2008, 53 (19) :N359-N370
[6]   Verification of dynamic radiotherapy:: the potential for 3D dosimetry under respiratory-like motion using polymer gel [J].
Ceberg, S. ;
Karlsson, A. ;
Gustavsson, H. ;
Wittgren, L. ;
Back, S. A. J. .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2008, 53 (20) :N387-N396
[7]   Modelling an extreme water-lung interface using a single pencil beam algorithm and the Monte Carlo method [J].
Cranmer-Sargison, G ;
Beckham, WA ;
Popescu, IA .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2004, 49 (08) :1557-1567
[8]   The influence of cooling rate on the accuracy of normoxic polymer gel dosimeters [J].
De Deene, Y. ;
Pittomvils, G. ;
Visalatchi, S. .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2007, 52 (10) :2719-2728
[9]   The history and principles of chemical dosimetry for 3-D radiation fields: Gels, polymers and plastics [J].
Doran, Simon J. .
APPLIED RADIATION AND ISOTOPES, 2009, 67 (03) :393-398
[10]  
Dumas E. -M., 2006, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, V56, P239, DOI 10.1088/1742-6596/56/1/038