Energy Retrofitting Strategies and Economic Assessments: The Case Study of a Residential Complex Using Utility Bills

被引:18
作者
Biserni, Cesare [1 ]
Valdiserri, Paolo [1 ]
D'Orazio, Dario [1 ]
Garai, Massimo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bologna, Alma Mater Studiorum, Sch Engn & Architecture, Dept Ind Engn DIN, Viale Risorgimento 2, I-40136 Bologna, Italy
关键词
building envelope; Trnsys simulations; energy consumption and saving; payback time; net present value; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION MODEL; WINDOW SIZE; BUILDINGS; PERFORMANCE; METHODOLOGY; EFFICIENCY; HOUSES;
D O I
10.3390/en11082055
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Promotion of retrofit actions on existing buildings is a goal in Italy, since most of them were built before the 80s when little attention was paid to energy saving. This paper presents an integrated passive design approach to reduce the heating demand and limit the costs of a representative existing residential complex located in Bologna, in the northern part of Italy. To this purpose, we explored different scenarios upon actions taken on the building structure: (1) High efficiency windows; (2) additional insulation on the external walls; or (3) the simultaneous application of high efficiency windows and improved thermal envelope, on both external walls and roofing. The numerical optimization has been performed dynamically using TRNSYS simulation tool, to evaluate energy consumptions in different structural conditions. Then, the developed model has been calibrated by the real consumption data deduced from energy bills (years 2009-2015). Finally, the energy results obtained in the above mentioned different scenarios have been evaluated under an economic assessment of cost investment: It has been highlighted that the payback time (PBT) results to be strongly influenced by the national policies of fiscal incentives. According to the present model, the most profitable condition is obtained when additional insulation on the external walls is applied: The total amount of energy saving resulted to be equal to 930.4 MWh, with an optimal PBT of roughly six years, when tax refund was contemplated.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   A calibration methodology for building dynamic models based on data collected through survey and billings [J].
Allesina, G. ;
Mussatti, E. ;
Ferrari, F. ;
Muscio, A. .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2018, 158 :406-416
[2]   A review on simulation-based optimization methods applied to building performance analysis [J].
Anh-Tuan Nguyen ;
Reiter, Sigrid ;
Rigo, Philippe .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2014, 113 :1043-1058
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2008, GAZZETTA UFFICI 0826
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2008, 15316212008 UNI EN E
[5]   A new methodology for cost-optimal analysis by means of the multi-objective optimization of building energy performance [J].
Ascione, Fabrizio ;
Bianco, Nicola ;
De Stasio, Claudio ;
Mauro, Gerardo Maria ;
Vanoli, Giuseppe Peter .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2015, 88 :78-90
[6]   Energy efficiency in buildings: What drives the investments? The case of Lombardy Region [J].
Aste, Niccolo ;
Caputo, Paola ;
Buzzetti, Michela ;
Fattore, Marta .
SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2016, 20 :27-37
[7]   A Decentralized Electricity Market Scheme Enabling Demand Response Deployment [J].
Bahrami, Shahab ;
Amini, M. Hadi ;
Shafie-khah, Miadreza ;
Catalao, Joao P. S. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2018, 33 (04) :4218-4227
[8]  
BPIE, 2011, EUR MICR BUILD PERF
[9]   Development of Decision Support Process for Building Energy Conservation Measures and Economic Analysis [J].
Choi, Bo-Eun ;
Shin, Ji-Hyun ;
Lee, Jin-Hyun ;
Kim, Sun-Sook ;
Cho, Young-Hum .
ENERGIES, 2017, 10 (03)
[10]   Economic Analysis of a Photovoltaic System: A Resource for Residential Households [J].
Cucchiella, Federica ;
D'Adamo, Idiano ;
Gastaldi, Massimo .
ENERGIES, 2017, 10 (06)