Duloxetine 60 mg for chronic low back pain: post hoc responder analysis of double-blind, placebo-controlled trials

被引:20
作者
Alev, Levent [1 ]
Fujikoshi, Shinji [2 ]
Yoshikawa, Aki [3 ]
Enomoto, Hiroyuki [1 ]
Ishida, Mitsuhiro [4 ]
Tsuji, Toshinaga [5 ]
Ogawa, Kei [1 ]
Konno, Shinichi [6 ]
机构
[1] Eli Lilly Japan KK, Biomed, Med Dev Unit, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
[2] Eli Lilly Japan KK, Stat Sci, Med Dev Unit, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
[3] Eli Lilly Japan KK, Sci Commun, Med Dev Unit, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
[4] Shionogi & Co Ltd, Clin Res Dev, Osaka, Japan
[5] Shionogi & Co Ltd, Med Affairs Dept, Osaka, Japan
[6] Fukushima Med Univ, Dept Orthoped Surg, Fukushima, Japan
关键词
Brief Pain Inventory; chronic pain; SNRI; low back pain; Michigan Body Map; multiple painful sites; PRESSURE PAIN; UNITED-STATES; MANAGEMENT; THRESHOLDS; EFFICACY; HEALTH;
D O I
10.2147/JPR.S138297
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Duloxetine has demonstrated efficacy in chronic low back pain (CLBP). We examined the predictors of response to duloxetine for CLBP. Patients and methods: This was a post hoc analysis of pooled data from 4 double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials of duloxetine (60 mg/day for 12-14 weeks) in adult patients with CLBP. Primary outcome was proportion of patients with >= 30% reduction in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) average pain ("pain reduction") at 12-14 weeks. The proportion of patients with >= 30% and >= 50% (secondary outcome) pain reduction in duloxetine and placebo groups was compared. Variables for responder analyses were early improvement (>= 15% pain reduction at Week 2), sex, age, baseline BPI average pain score, duration of CLBP, and number of painful body sites according to the Michigan Body Map (>= 2 vs 1 [isolated CLBP]; 1 trial); relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. Results: Compared with placebo (n = 653), a greater proportion of duloxetine-treated patients (n = 642) achieved >= 30% (59.7% vs 47.8%; P < 0.001) and >= 50% pain reduction (48.6% vs 35.1%; P < 0.001). Among duloxetine-treated patients, early improvement was associated with greater likelihood of >= 30% (RR [95% CI], 2.91 [2.30-3.67]) or >= 50% (3.24 [2.44-4.31]) pain reduction. Women were slightly more likely than men to achieve >= 30% (RR [95% CI], 1.14 [1.00-1.30]) or >= 50% (1.17 [0.99-1.38]) pain reduction. Response rates were similar between age, CLBP duration, and baseline BPI average pain score subgroups. Patients with >= 2 painful sites were more likely to respond to duloxetine 60 mg relative to placebo than patients with isolated CLBP (RR, duloxetine vs placebo [95% CI]: >= 30% reduction, >= 2 painful sites 1.40 [1.18-1.66], isolated CLBP 1.07 [0.78-1.48]; >= 50% reduction, >= 2 painful sites 1.51 [1.20-1.89], isolated CLBP 1.23 [0.81-1.88]). Conclusion: Early pain reduction was indicative of overall response. Patients with multiple painful sites had more benefit from duloxetine than patients with isolated CLBP.
引用
收藏
页码:1723 / 1731
页数:9
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Chapter 4 - European guidelines for the management of chronic nonspecific low back pain [J].
Airaksinen, O. ;
Brox, J. I. ;
Cedraschi, C. ;
Hildebrandt, J. ;
Klaber-Moffett, J. ;
Kovacs, F. ;
Mannion, A. F. ;
Reis, S. ;
Staal, J. B. ;
Ursin, H. ;
Zanoli, G. .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2006, 15 (Suppl 2) :S192-S300
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2016, Prescribing information
[3]   Preliminary validation of the Michigan Body Map [J].
Brummett, Chad M. ;
Bakshi, Rishi R. ;
Goesling, Jenna ;
Leung, Daniel ;
Moser, Stephanie E. ;
Zollars, Jennifer W. ;
Williams, David A. ;
Clauw, Daniel J. ;
Hassett, Afton L. .
PAIN, 2016, 157 (06) :1205-1212
[4]   Duloxetine (Cymbalta™), a dual inhibitor of serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake [J].
Bymaster, FP ;
Beedle, EE ;
Findlay, J ;
Gallagher, PT ;
Krushinski, JH ;
Mitchell, S ;
Robertson, DW ;
Thompson, DC ;
Wallace, L ;
Wong, DT .
BIOORGANIC & MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS, 2003, 13 (24) :4477-4480
[5]   Diagnosis and treatment of low back pain: A joint clinical practice guideline from the American college of physicians and the American pain society [J].
Chou, Roger ;
Qaseem, Amir ;
Snow, Vincenza ;
Casey, Donald ;
Cross, J. Thomas, Jr. ;
Shekelle, Paul ;
Owens, Douglas K. .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2007, 147 (07) :478-491
[6]   Diagnosing and treating chronic musculoskeletal pain based on the underlying mechanism(s) [J].
Clauw, Daniel J. .
BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH IN CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2015, 29 (01) :6-19
[7]   A systematic review of low back pain cost of illness studies in the United States and internationally [J].
Dagenais, Simon ;
Caro, Jaime ;
Haldeman, Scott .
SPINE JOURNAL, 2008, 8 (01) :8-20
[8]   The influence of non-specific low back pain on pressure pain thresholds and disability [J].
Farasyn, A ;
Meeusen, R .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2005, 9 (04) :375-381
[9]   The Clinical Importance of Changes in the 0 to 10 Numeric Rating Scale for Worst, Least, and Average Pain Intensity: Analyses of Data from Clinical Trials of Duloxetine in Pain Disorders [J].
Farrar, John T. ;
Pritchett, Yili L. ;
Robinson, Michael ;
Prakash, Apurva ;
Chappell, Amy .
JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2010, 11 (02) :109-118
[10]   Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale [J].
Farrar, JT ;
Young, JP ;
LaMoreaux, L ;
Werth, JL ;
Poole, RM .
PAIN, 2001, 94 (02) :149-158