Sex Bias in Cardiovascular Testing: The Contribution of Patient Preference

被引:22
作者
Mumma, Bryn E.
Baumann, Brigitte M. [3 ]
Diercks, Deborah B. [4 ]
Takakuwa, Kevin M. [2 ]
Campbell, Caren F.
Shofer, Frances S.
Chang, Anna Marie
Jones, Molly K. [3 ]
Hollander, Judd E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Univ Penn, Dept Emergency Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Thomas Jefferson Univ Hosp, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[3] Cooper Univ Hosp, Camden, NJ USA
[4] Univ Calif Davis, Sacramento, CA 95817 USA
关键词
ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROMES; GENDER-DIFFERENCES; ARTERY-DISEASE; EMERGENCY-DEPARTMENT; CARDIAC PROCEDURES; AMERICAN-COLLEGE; WOMEN; RISK; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.09.026
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Study objective: Women with potential acute coronary syndromes are less likely to receive cardiac catheterization or revascularization than men. We hypothesize that this may be due to different diagnostic test preferences of female and male patients. Methods: We conducted a cohort study at 4 emergency departments enrolling patients who presented with symptoms of potential acute coronary syndromes. After hearing the potential benefits and harms of each test, subjects completed a 21-item survey assessing their preference for noninvasive testing versus cardiac catheterization. Based on hypothetical test results, similar questions about medical versus interventional management were asked. Subjects were also queried about likelihood of following physician recommendation for each test or intervention. Actual 30-day testing and interventions were recorded. The main outcome was patient preference about each procedure and the likelihood of patient saying they would accept the physician recommendation. Results: One thousand eighty patients enrolled; 652 (60%) were admitted to the hospital. With regard to diagnostic test preference, both women and men preferred stress test to catheterization (women 58% versus men 52%; difference 6% [95% confidence interval {CI} -0.06% to 12%]), and the proportion of women and men who would accept the physician recommendation for stress tests was similar (85% for both); however, the stated acceptance rate for cardiac catheterization was lower for women (65% versus 75%; difference -10% [95% CI -15% to -4%]). Women were 6% less likely (67% versus 73%; 95% Cl for difference 12% to 0.5%) to accept percutaneous coronary intervention over medical therapy and 7% less likely (61% versus 68%; 95% Cl for difference -13% to 1%) to desire coronary artery bypass grafting over medical therapy. The survey results are consistent with the patients' clinical course. During the initial hospitalization, women were less likely to receive diagnostic testing of any type (38% versus 45%; difference -7%; 95% Cl for the difference -13% to -1.5%) and cardiac catheterization (10% versus 17%; difference -7% [95% CI -11% to -2%]). Revascularization was infrequent in both groups (4% versus 6%; difference -2% [95% CI -5% to 0.6%]). Conclusion: Although women and men had similar preferences about cardiac diagnostic tests and treatment options, women were less likely than men to say they would accept the physician recommendation for any intervention. Patient preference may partially explain the disparity in cardiovascular testing between women and men. [Ann Emerg Med. 2011; 57:551-560.]
引用
收藏
页码:551 / 560
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Sex and gender differences in cardiovascular prevention
    Tschaftary, A.
    Oertelt-Prigione, S.
    DEUTSCHE MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2014, 139 (49) : 2541 - 2545
  • [42] Association of Author Gender With Sex Bias in Surgical Research
    Xiao, Nicholas
    Mansukhani, Neel A.
    de Oliveira, Diego F. Mendes
    Kibbe, Melina R.
    JAMA SURGERY, 2018, 153 (07) : 663 - 670
  • [43] Standardized Cardiovascular Data for Clinical Research, Registries, and Patient Care
    Anderson, H. Vernon
    Weintraub, William S.
    Radford, Martha J.
    Kremers, Mark S.
    Roe, Matthew T.
    Shaw, Richard E.
    Pinchotti, Dana M.
    Tcheng, James E.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 61 (18) : 1835 - 1846
  • [44] Sex Differences in Type-2 Diabetes: Implications for Cardiovascular Risk Management
    Raparelli, Valeria
    Morano, Susanna
    Franconi, Flavia
    Lenzi, Andrea
    Basili, Stefania
    CURRENT PHARMACEUTICAL DESIGN, 2017, 23 (10) : 1471 - 1476
  • [45] Sex bias in admission to tertiary-care centres for acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock
    Sambola, Antonia
    Elola, Francisco Javier
    Buera, Irene
    Fernandez, Cristina
    Bernal, Jose Luis
    Ariza, Albert
    Brindis, Ralph
    Bueno, Hector
    Rodriguez-Padial, Luis
    Marin, Francisco
    Barrabes, Jose Antonio
    Hsia, Renee
    Anguita, Manuel
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 2021, 51 (07)
  • [46] Sex beyond cardiovascular risk factors and clinical biomarkers of cardiovascular disease
    Bergami, Maria
    Scarpone, Marialuisa
    Bugiardini, Raffaele
    Cenko, Edina
    Manfrini, Olivia
    REVIEWS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2022, 23 (01)
  • [47] Female sex-specific considerations to improve rigor and reproducibility in cardiovascular research
    Chang, Danica H.
    Dumanski, Sandra M.
    Ahmed, Sofia B.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-HEART AND CIRCULATORY PHYSIOLOGY, 2023, 324 (03): : H279 - H287
  • [48] Cardiovascular Effect and Symptom Profile of Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Does Sex Matter?
    Bouloukaki, Izolde
    Mermigkis, Charalampos
    Markakis, Manolis
    Pataka, Athanasia
    Alexaki, Ioanna
    Ermidou, Christina
    Moniaki, Violeta
    Mauroudi, Eleni
    Michelakis, Stylianos
    Schiza, Sophia E.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SLEEP MEDICINE, 2019, 15 (12): : 1737 - 1745
  • [49] Gender Bias in AI's Perception of Cardiovascular Risk
    Achtari, Margaux
    Salihu, Adil
    Muller, Olivier
    Abbe, Emmanuel
    Clair, Carole
    Schwarz, Joelle
    Fournier, Stephane
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2024, 26
  • [50] Implications of Bias in Artificial Intelligence: Considerations for Cardiovascular Imaging
    van Assen, Marly
    Beecy, Ashley
    Gershon, Gabrielle
    Newsome, Janice
    Trivedi, Hari
    Gichoya, Judy
    CURRENT ATHEROSCLEROSIS REPORTS, 2024, 26 (04) : 91 - 102