共 32 条
What Is the Best Femoral Fixation of Hamstring Autografts in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction?: A Meta-analysis
被引:37
作者:
Colvin, Alexis
[1
]
Sharma, Charu
[3
]
Parides, Michael
[2
]
Glashow, Jonathan
[1
]
机构:
[1] Mt Sinai Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed, New York, NY 10029 USA
[2] Mt Sinai Med Ctr, Dept Hlth Policy & Outcomes, New York, NY 10029 USA
[3] Columbia Univ, Dept Radiol, Med Ctr, New York, NY USA
关键词:
BIOABSORBABLE INTERFERENCE SCREWS;
TENDON ACL RECONSTRUCTION;
GRAFT FIXATION;
PATELLAR TENDON;
CURRENT TRENDS;
BONE TUNNEL;
FOLLOW-UP;
DEVICES;
TRANSFIXATION;
BIOSCREW;
D O I:
10.1007/s11999-010-1662-4
中图分类号:
R826.8 [整形外科学];
R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学];
R726.2 [小儿整形外科学];
R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Several methods are available for fixing the femoral side of a hamstring autograft in ACL reconstruction and the best method is unclear. Biomechanical studies have shown varying results with regard to fixation failure. We asked whether there were any differences with regard to graft failures and functional outcome measures with differing methods of femoral fixation of hamstring autografts in ACL reconstruction. We systematically reviewed the literature using PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane Controlled Trial Register databases with regard to interference screw fixation (aperture fixation) versus noninterference screw fixation (fixation away from the joint line). A meta-analysis was performed of those studies reporting on surgical failures and postoperative International Knee Documentation Committee score. Eight studies met our inclusion criteria of Level I or II evidence. Use of interference screws for femoral fixation resulted in a trend toward decreased risk of surgical failure (relative risk = 0.57; confidence interval, 0.1678-1.0918). When only Level I trials were evaluated, the same trend was noted toward a decreased risk of surgical failures using femoral interference screws (relative risk = 0.52; confidence interval, 0.1794-1.3122). There was no difference in postoperative International Knee Documentation Committee score with Level I and II studies (relative risk = 0.9940; confidence interval, 0.6230-1.5860) or only Level I studies (relative risk = 1.0380; confidence interval, 0.6381-1.6886). The literature suggests a trend toward decreased surgical failures with femoral fixation at the joint line with an interference screw. However, there is no difference when postoperative functional outcomes are compared. Future studies are needed with standardized fixation methods and outcomes assessment to determine the importance of femoral fixation.
引用
收藏
页码:1075 / 1081
页数:7
相关论文