Comparison of the short-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive, video-assisted minimally invasive, and open esophagectomy

被引:29
作者
Gong, Lei [1 ,2 ]
Jiang, Hongjing [1 ,2 ]
Yue, Jie [1 ,2 ]
Duan, Xiaofeng [1 ,2 ]
Tang, Peng [1 ,2 ]
Ren, Peng [1 ,2 ]
Zhao, Xijiang [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Xiangming [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Xi [3 ]
Yu, Zhentao [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Med Univ Canc Inst & Hosp, Tianjins Clin Res Ctr Canc, Dept Esophageal Canc, Huan Hu Xi Rd, Tianjin 300060, Peoples R China
[2] Tianjin Med Univ Canc Inst & Hosp, Natl Clin Res Ctr Canc, Key Lab Canc Prevent & Therapy, Huan Hu Xi Rd, Tianjin 300060, Peoples R China
[3] Tianjin Med Univ, Sch & Hosp Stomatol, 12 Observ Rd, Tianjin 300070, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Esophageal cancer (EC); minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE); lymphadenectomy; THORACOSCOPIC ESOPHAGECTOMY; ATRIAL-FIBRILLATION; CANCER;
D O I
10.21037/jtd.2019.12.56
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The development of minimally invasive surgery has initiated many changes in the surgical treatment of esophageal cancer (EC) patients. The aim of this study was to compare the short-term outcomes of robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE), video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (VAMIE), and open esophagectomy (OE). Methods: Our study included patients who had undergone McKeown esophagectomy at Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital between January 2016 and December 2018. We analyzed clinical baseline data, as well as perioperative and pathological outcomes. Results: A total of 312 cases met the inclusion criteria (OE: 77, VAMIE: 144, RAMIE: 91). The OE group had a greater number of late-stage patients as well as those who received the neo-adjuvant therapy, compared with the other two groups (P=0.001). The procedure time in the OE group was also shorter by approximately 20 minutes (P=0.021). Total blood loss was significantly lower in the two MIE groups (P=0.(X)4) than in the OE group. There were no differences in the total number of dissected lymph nodes between the three groups (OE: 24.09 +/- 10.77, VAMIE: 23.07 +/- 10.18, RAMIE: 22.84 +/- 8.37, P=0.680). Both the lymph node number (P=0.155) and achievement rate (P=0.190) in the right recurrent laryngeal nerve (R.I.N) area were comparable between the three groups. However, in the left RLN area, minimally invasive approaches resulted in a higher number of harvested lymph nodes (P=0.032) and greater achievement rate (P=0.018). Neither MIE procedure increased the incidence of postoperative complications. Conclusions: Minimally invasive surgery could guarantee the quality of bilateral RLN lymphadenectomy without increasing postoperative complications, especially in RAMIE patients. The rational choice of different surgical approaches would improve both safety and oncological outcomes for patients.
引用
收藏
页码:916 / +
页数:10
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial [J].
Biere, Surya S. A. Y. ;
Henegouwen, Mark I. van Berge ;
Maas, Kirsten W. ;
Bonavina, Luigi ;
Rosman, Camiel ;
Roig Garcia, Josep ;
Gisbertz, Suzanne S. ;
Klinkenbijl, Jean H. G. ;
Hollmann, Markus W. ;
de lange, Elly S. M. ;
Bonjer, H. Jaap ;
van der Peet, Donald L. ;
Cuesta, Miguel A. .
LANCET, 2012, 379 (9829) :1887-1892
[2]   Lymph Node Evaluation in Robot-Assisted Versus Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Propensity-Matched Analysis [J].
Chao, Yin-Kai ;
Hsieh, Ming-Ju ;
Liu, Yun-Hen ;
Liu, Hui-Ping .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 42 (02) :590-598
[3]   Incidence and impact of postoperative atrial fibrillation after minimally invasive esophagectomy [J].
Day, R. W. ;
Jaroszewski, D. ;
Chang, Y. -H. H. ;
Ross, H. J. ;
Paripati, H. ;
Ashman, J. B. ;
Rule, W. G. ;
Harold, K. L. .
DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS, 2016, 29 (06) :583-588
[4]   Comparison of short-term outcomes between robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy and video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy in treating middle thoracic esophageal cancer [J].
Deng, H. -Y. ;
Huang, W. -X. ;
Li, G. ;
Li, S. -X. ;
Luo, J. ;
Alai, G. ;
Wang, Y. ;
Liu, L. -X. ;
Lin, Y. -D. .
DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS, 2018, 31 (08)
[5]   The evolution of surgical approach for esophageal cancer [J].
Gisbertz, Suzanne S. ;
Hagens, Eliza R. C. ;
Ruurda, Jelle P. ;
Schneider, Paul M. ;
Tan, Li Jie ;
Domrachev, Sergey A. ;
Hoeppner, Jens ;
Henegouwen, Mark I. van Berge .
ANNALS OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, 2018, 1434 (01) :149-155
[6]   Robot-Assisted Mckeown Esophagectomy is Feasible After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation. Our Initial Experience [J].
Goel, Ashish ;
Shah, Swati H. ;
Selvakumar, Veda Padma Priya ;
Garg, Shubha ;
Kumar, Kapil .
INDIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 80 (01) :24-29
[7]   The extent of lymphadenectomy in esophageal resection for cancer should be standardized [J].
Hagens, Eliza R. C. ;
Henegouwen, Mark I. van Berge ;
Cuesta, Miguel A. ;
Gisbertz, Suzanne S. .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2017, 9 :S713-S723
[8]   Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a propensity score matched analysis [J].
He, Haiqi ;
Wu, Qifei ;
Wang, Zhe ;
Zhang, Yong ;
Chen, Nanzheng ;
Fu, Junke ;
Zhang, Guangjian .
JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC SURGERY, 2018, 13
[9]  
Jemal A, 2011, CA-CANCER J CLIN, V61, P134, DOI [10.3322/caac.20107, 10.3322/caac.20115, 10.3322/caac.21492]
[10]   Robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy versus the conventional minimally invasive one: A meta-analysis and systematic review [J].
Jin, Dacheng ;
Yao, Liang ;
Yu, Jun ;
Liu, Rong ;
Guo, Tiankang ;
Yang, Kehu ;
Gou, Yunjiu .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2019, 15 (03)