Comparison of the short-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive, video-assisted minimally invasive, and open esophagectomy

被引:27
|
作者
Gong, Lei [1 ,2 ]
Jiang, Hongjing [1 ,2 ]
Yue, Jie [1 ,2 ]
Duan, Xiaofeng [1 ,2 ]
Tang, Peng [1 ,2 ]
Ren, Peng [1 ,2 ]
Zhao, Xijiang [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Xiangming [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Xi [3 ]
Yu, Zhentao [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Med Univ Canc Inst & Hosp, Tianjins Clin Res Ctr Canc, Dept Esophageal Canc, Huan Hu Xi Rd, Tianjin 300060, Peoples R China
[2] Tianjin Med Univ Canc Inst & Hosp, Natl Clin Res Ctr Canc, Key Lab Canc Prevent & Therapy, Huan Hu Xi Rd, Tianjin 300060, Peoples R China
[3] Tianjin Med Univ, Sch & Hosp Stomatol, 12 Observ Rd, Tianjin 300070, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Esophageal cancer (EC); minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE); lymphadenectomy; THORACOSCOPIC ESOPHAGECTOMY; ATRIAL-FIBRILLATION; CANCER;
D O I
10.21037/jtd.2019.12.56
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The development of minimally invasive surgery has initiated many changes in the surgical treatment of esophageal cancer (EC) patients. The aim of this study was to compare the short-term outcomes of robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE), video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (VAMIE), and open esophagectomy (OE). Methods: Our study included patients who had undergone McKeown esophagectomy at Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital between January 2016 and December 2018. We analyzed clinical baseline data, as well as perioperative and pathological outcomes. Results: A total of 312 cases met the inclusion criteria (OE: 77, VAMIE: 144, RAMIE: 91). The OE group had a greater number of late-stage patients as well as those who received the neo-adjuvant therapy, compared with the other two groups (P=0.001). The procedure time in the OE group was also shorter by approximately 20 minutes (P=0.021). Total blood loss was significantly lower in the two MIE groups (P=0.(X)4) than in the OE group. There were no differences in the total number of dissected lymph nodes between the three groups (OE: 24.09 +/- 10.77, VAMIE: 23.07 +/- 10.18, RAMIE: 22.84 +/- 8.37, P=0.680). Both the lymph node number (P=0.155) and achievement rate (P=0.190) in the right recurrent laryngeal nerve (R.I.N) area were comparable between the three groups. However, in the left RLN area, minimally invasive approaches resulted in a higher number of harvested lymph nodes (P=0.032) and greater achievement rate (P=0.018). Neither MIE procedure increased the incidence of postoperative complications. Conclusions: Minimally invasive surgery could guarantee the quality of bilateral RLN lymphadenectomy without increasing postoperative complications, especially in RAMIE patients. The rational choice of different surgical approaches would improve both safety and oncological outcomes for patients.
引用
收藏
页码:916 / +
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of short-term outcomes between robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy and video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy in treating middle thoracic esophageal cancer
    Deng, H. -Y.
    Huang, W. -X.
    Li, G.
    Li, S. -X.
    Luo, J.
    Alai, G.
    Wang, Y.
    Liu, L. -X.
    Lin, Y. -D.
    DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS, 2018, 31 (08)
  • [2] Comparison of short-term clinical outcomes between robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy and video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zheng, Chao
    Li, Xiao-Kun
    Zhang, Chi
    Zhou, Hai
    Ji, Sai-Guang
    Zhong, Ji-Hong
    Xu, Yang
    Cong, Zhuang-Zhuang
    Wang, Gao-Ming
    Wu, Wen-Jie
    Shen, Yi
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2021, 13 (02)
  • [3] Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy with extended lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer compared with video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: A single-center retrospective study
    Morimoto, Yosuke
    Kawakubo, Hirofumi
    Ishikawa, Aiko
    Matsuda, Satoru
    Hijikata, Nanako
    Ando, Makiko
    Mayanagi, Shuhei
    Irino, Tomoyuki
    Nakamura, Rieko
    Wada, Norihito
    Tsuji, Tetsuya
    Kitagawa, Yuko
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY, 2022, 15 (02) : 270 - 278
  • [4] Short-term Outcomes of Robot-assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Compared With Thoracoscopic or Transthoracic Esophagectomy
    Booka, Eisuke
    Kikuchi, Hirotoshi
    Haneda, Ryoma
    Soneda, Wataru
    Kawata, Sanshiro
    Murakami, Tomohiro
    Matsumoto, Tomohiro
    Hiramatsu, Yoshihiro
    Takeuchi, Hiroya
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2021, 41 (09) : 4455 - 4462
  • [5] Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy versus video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: a meta-analysis and systemic review
    Chen, Hao
    Liu, Yiyang
    Peng, Hao
    Wang, Rongchun
    Wang, Kang
    Li, Demin
    TRANSLATIONAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2021, 10 (11) : 4601 - 4616
  • [6] Robot-assisted minimally invasive Esophagectomy
    Schroeder, W.
    Bruns, C. J.
    CHIRURG, 2019, 90 (01): : 66 - 66
  • [7] Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy
    van Hillegersberg, R.
    Seesing, M. F. J.
    Brenkman, H. J. F.
    Ruurda, J. P.
    CHIRURG, 2017, 88 : 7 - 11
  • [8] Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy is equivalent to thoracoscopic minimally invasive esophagectomy
    Weksler, B.
    Sharma, P.
    Moudgill, N.
    Chojnacki, K. A.
    Rosato, E. L.
    DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS, 2012, 25 (05) : 403 - 409
  • [9] Will robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy improve patient outcomes compared to conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy?
    Abe, Tetsuya
    Higaki, Eiji
    Fujieda, Hironori
    Saito, Hisafumi
    Narita, Kiyoshi
    Komori, Koji
    Ito, Seiji
    Shimizu, Yasuhiro
    MINI-INVASIVE SURGERY, 2023, 7
  • [10] Outcomes of Minimally Invasive and Robot-Assisted Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer
    Banks, Kian C.
    Hsu, Diana S.
    Velotta, Jeffrey B.
    CANCERS, 2022, 14 (15)