ESL/EFL Learners' Responses to Teacher Written Feedback: Reviewing a Recent Decade of Empirical Studies

被引:6
作者
Yu, Rong [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Luxin [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Foreign Studies Univ, Natl Res Ctr Foreign Language Educ, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Foreign Studies Univ, Grad Sch Educ, Beijing, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY | 2021年 / 12卷
关键词
ESL; EFL learners' responses; teacher written feedback; English writing; empirical studies; review; sociocultural theory of mind; CORRECTIVE-FEEDBACK; STUDENT ENGAGEMENT; EFL; MODELS; ENGLISH; PERCEPTIONS; PERFORMANCE; IMPROVEMENT; ACCURACY; ERROR;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2021.735101
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Teacher written feedback (TWF) has long been regarded as a necessary pedagogical tool for improving the writing proficiency of ESL/EFL learners, while student responses to this feedback can often reflect its effectiveness. This paper reviews 64 articles appearing in high-ranking journals during 2010-2021 in terms of research methodology, theoretical framework and main findings. Analysis of these articles reveals few studies adopted any theoretical frameworks to examine learner responses to TWF and suggests a need for longitudinal naturalistic studies adopting mixed methods and some theoretical framework such as sociocultural theory of mind (SCT) to better explain learners' dynamic engagement in response to TWF. The main findings of these previous studies reveal the diverse responses among learners at different language proficiency levels and in various sociocultural contexts. The results of the review indicate that future research could take classroom-based mixed-method research design to investigate learner variables.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 109 条
[11]   The value of a focused approach to written corrective feedback [J].
Bitchener, John ;
Knoch, Ute .
ELT JOURNAL, 2009, 63 (03) :204-211
[12]   Interpreting coded feedback on writing: Turkish EFL students' approaches to revision [J].
Buckingham, Louisa ;
Aktug-Ekinci, Duygu .
JOURNAL OF ENGLISH FOR ACADEMIC PURPOSES, 2017, 26 :1-16
[13]   The use of models as a written feedback technique with young EFL learners [J].
Canovas Guirao, Josefa ;
Roca de Larios, Julio ;
Coyle, Yvette .
SYSTEM, 2015, 52 :63-77
[14]   Interplay among technical, socio-emotional and personal factors in written feedback research [J].
Chong, Ivan .
ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2018, 43 (02) :185-196
[15]   College students' perception of e-feedback: a grounded theory perspective [J].
Chong, Sin Wang .
ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2019, 44 (07) :1090-1105
[16]  
Cohen A., 1990, Second Language Writing: Research insights for the classroom, P155
[17]   Exploring young learners' engagement with models as a written corrective technique in EFL and CLIL settings [J].
Coyle, Yvette ;
Roca de Larios, Julio .
SYSTEM, 2020, 95
[18]   Identifying the trajectories of young EFL learners across multi-stage writing and feedback processing tasks with model texts [J].
Coyle, Yvette ;
Canovas Guirao, Josefa ;
Roca de Larios, Julio .
JOURNAL OF SECOND LANGUAGE WRITING, 2018, 42 :25-43
[19]   A comparison of peer, teacher and self-feedback on the reduction of language errors in student essays [J].
Diab, Nuwar Mawlawi .
SYSTEM, 2016, 57 :55-65
[20]   Effectiveness of written corrective feedback: Does type of error and type of correction matter? [J].
Diab, Nuwar Mawlawi .
ASSESSING WRITING, 2015, 24 :16-34