ESL/EFL Learners' Responses to Teacher Written Feedback: Reviewing a Recent Decade of Empirical Studies

被引:6
作者
Yu, Rong [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Luxin [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Foreign Studies Univ, Natl Res Ctr Foreign Language Educ, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Foreign Studies Univ, Grad Sch Educ, Beijing, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY | 2021年 / 12卷
关键词
ESL; EFL learners' responses; teacher written feedback; English writing; empirical studies; review; sociocultural theory of mind; CORRECTIVE-FEEDBACK; STUDENT ENGAGEMENT; EFL; MODELS; ENGLISH; PERCEPTIONS; PERFORMANCE; IMPROVEMENT; ACCURACY; ERROR;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2021.735101
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Teacher written feedback (TWF) has long been regarded as a necessary pedagogical tool for improving the writing proficiency of ESL/EFL learners, while student responses to this feedback can often reflect its effectiveness. This paper reviews 64 articles appearing in high-ranking journals during 2010-2021 in terms of research methodology, theoretical framework and main findings. Analysis of these articles reveals few studies adopted any theoretical frameworks to examine learner responses to TWF and suggests a need for longitudinal naturalistic studies adopting mixed methods and some theoretical framework such as sociocultural theory of mind (SCT) to better explain learners' dynamic engagement in response to TWF. The main findings of these previous studies reveal the diverse responses among learners at different language proficiency levels and in various sociocultural contexts. The results of the review indicate that future research could take classroom-based mixed-method research design to investigate learner variables.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 109 条
[1]   Cultivating learners' technology-mediated dialogue of feedback in writing: processes, potentials and limitations [J].
Abdu Saeed Mohammed, Murad ;
Abdullah Alharbi, Mohammed .
ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2022, 47 (06) :942-958
[2]   The Socialization of L2 Doctoral Students through Written Feedback [J].
Anderson, Tim .
JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE IDENTITY AND EDUCATION, 2021, 20 (02) :134-149
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Dialogic inquiry:Towards a sociocultural practice and theory of education
[4]   Student perspectives on formative feedback as part of writing portfolios [J].
Bader, Monika ;
Burner, Tony ;
Iversen, Sarah Hoem ;
Varga, Zoltan .
ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2019, 44 (07) :1017-1028
[5]   The effects of direct and indirect speech acts on native English and ESL speakers' perception of teacher written feedback [J].
Baker, Wendy ;
Bricker, Rachel Hansen .
SYSTEM, 2010, 38 (01) :75-84
[6]  
Bakla A, 2020, LANG LEARN TECHNOL, V24, P107
[7]  
Bitchener J., 2012, Written corrective feedback in second language acquisition and writing
[8]  
Bitchener J.Storch., 2016, Written corrective feedback for L2 development
[9]   Raising the linguistic accuracy level of advanced L2 writers with written corrective feedback [J].
Bitchener, John ;
Knoch, Ute .
JOURNAL OF SECOND LANGUAGE WRITING, 2010, 19 (04) :207-217
[10]   The relative effectiveness of different types of direct written corrective feedback [J].
Bitchener, John ;
Knoch, Ute .
SYSTEM, 2009, 37 (02) :322-329