ROLE OF POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY IN THE TREATMENT OF OCCULT DISEASE IN HEAD-AND-NECK CANCER: A MODELING APPROACH

被引:8
作者
Phillips, Mark H. [1 ]
Smith, Wade P. [2 ]
Parvathaneni, Upendra [1 ]
Laramore, George E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Radiat Oncol, Med Ctr, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Dept Vet Affairs, Albany, NY USA
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2011年 / 79卷 / 04期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Bayesian network; PET; Head-and-neck cancer; Optimal policy; SQUAMOUS-CELL-CARCINOMA; RADIATION-THERAPY; HEALTH STATES; UTILITIES; STAGE; RADIOTHERAPY; RISK; NEED;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.12.037
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To determine under what conditions positron emission tomography (PET) imaging will be useful in decisions regarding the use of radiotherapy for the treatment of clinically occult lymph node metastases in head-and-neck cancer. Methods and Materials: A decision model of PET imaging and its downstream effects on radiotherapy outcomes was constructed using an influence diagram. This model included the sensitivity and specificity of PET, as well as the type and stage of the primary tumor. These parameters were varied to determine the optimal strategy for imaging and therapy for different clinical situations. Maximum expected utility was the metric by which different actions were ranked. Results: For primary tumors with a low probability of lymph node metastases, the sensitivity of PET should be maximized, and 50 Gy should be delivered if PET is positive and 0 Gy if negative. As the probability for lymph node metastases increases, PET imaging becomes unnecessary in some situations, and the optimal dose to the lymph nodes increases. The model needed to include the causes of certain health states to predict current clinical practice. Conclusion: The model demonstrated the ability to reproduce expected outcomes for a range of tumors and provided recommendations for different clinical situations. The differences between the optimal policies and current clinical practice are likely due to a disparity between stated clinical decision processes and actual decision making by clinicians. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1089 / 1095
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2007, Bayesian networks and decision graphs, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-68282-2
[2]   Resource-Limited Multiattribute Value Analysis of Alternatives for Immobilizing Radioactive Liquid Process Waste Stored in Saluggia, Italy [J].
Brothers, Alan J. ;
Mattigod, Shas V. ;
Strachan, Denis M. ;
Beeman, Gordon H. ;
Kearns, Paul K. ;
Papa, Angelo ;
Monti, Carlo .
DECISION ANALYSIS, 2009, 6 (02) :98-114
[3]   Predictors of preferences and utilities in men treated with 3D-CRT for prostate cancer [J].
Bruner, DW ;
Hanlon, A ;
Mazzoni, S ;
Raysor, S ;
Konski, A ;
Hanks, G ;
Pollack, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2004, 58 (01) :34-42
[4]   Prostate cancer patients' utilities for health states: How it looks depends on where you stand [J].
Chapman, GB ;
Elstein, AS ;
Kuzel, TM ;
Sharifi, R ;
Nadler, RB ;
Andrews, A ;
Bennett, CL .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1998, 18 (03) :278-286
[5]   Where are the at-risk cervical nodes? [J].
Garden, AS .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2004, 58 (01) :1-2
[6]   Revisiting the Role of Positron-Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in Determining the Need for Planned Neck Dissection Following Chemoradiation for Advanced Head and Neck Cancer [J].
Gourin, Christine G. ;
Boyce, Brian J. ;
Williams, Hadyn T. ;
Herdman, Anne V. ;
Bilodeau, Paul A. ;
Coleman, Teresa A. .
LARYNGOSCOPE, 2009, 119 (11) :2150-2155
[7]  
Hunink MGM., 2001, Decision Making in Health and Medicine: Integrating Evidence and Values
[8]   Patients' utilities for cancer treatments: A study of the chained procedure for the standard gamble and time tradeoff [J].
Jansen, SJT ;
Stiggelbout, AM ;
Wakker, PP ;
Vlieland, TPMV ;
Leer, JWH ;
Nooy, MA ;
Kievit, J .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1998, 18 (04) :391-399
[9]   The Diagnostic and Prognostic Utility of Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography-Based Follow-Up After Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer [J].
Kao, Johnny ;
Vu, Ha Linh ;
Genden, Eric M. ;
Mocherla, Bharat ;
Park, Eunice E. ;
Packer, Stuart ;
Som, Peter M. ;
Kostakoglu, Lale .
CANCER, 2009, 115 (19) :4586-4594
[10]  
LINDBERG R, 1972, CANCER, V29, P1446, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(197206)29:6<1446::AID-CNCR2820290604>3.0.CO