Classification of the aphasic syndrome

被引:2
|
作者
Perea-Bartolomé, MV [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Salamanca, Dept Psicol Bas Psicobiol & Metodol Ciencias Comp, E-37005 Salamanca, Spain
关键词
aphasia; classification; clinical forms; evaluation; language; neuropsychology;
D O I
10.33588/rn.3205.2000173
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction. The clinical examination of language should form part of the general examination of the mental state in patients with diffuse cognitive disorders, intellectual disorders, disorders of memory, etc. Objective. To focus the examination of language towards understanding and classification of linguistic activity, through study of aphasia. Development. We analyze the semiological diversity of aphasia and most relevant clinical forms using a diagnostic derision tree to consider the clinical, neuropsychological and neuroanatomical characteristics. The more derailed the study of the aphasic disorder, the move difficult it is to fit the case into a particular clinical type. In fact, as may be seen from current publications. there are more and more studies of aphasic persons considered to have unclassifiable aphasia. The more and more detailed studies of neuropsychological disorders mean that we now find terms such as primary progressive aphasia, semantic dementia and anarthria or progressive aphemia. This groups of abnormal linguistic features appearing in patients with focal degenerative illness may lead to some confusion, not only in the clinicosemiological sphere but also crith regard to diagnosis, classification and evolution of the disorder Conclusions. By studying aphasia we may study the anatomofunctional basis of language more fully, investigate the different systems for processing information, study cases with particular dysfunctions and specifically evaluate, case by case, the numerous, complex components of linguistic activity.
引用
收藏
页码:483 / 488
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The aphasic utterance: A significal perspective
    Pinto, Rosana Novaes
    SEMIOTICA, 2013, 196 (1-4) : 457 - 472
  • [42] Aphasic deficits in syntactic processing
    Caplan, David
    CORTEX, 2006, 42 (06) : 797 - 804
  • [43] A linguistic communication measure for monitoring changes in Chinese aphasic narrative production
    Kong, Anthony Pak-Hin
    Law, Sam-Po
    CLINICAL LINGUISTICS & PHONETICS, 2009, 23 (04) : 255 - 269
  • [44] Dementia unmasked: Atypical, acute aphasic, presentations of neurodegenerative dementing disease
    Larner, AJ
    CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2005, 108 (01) : 8 - 10
  • [45] SOME CONTROVERSIES ABOUT TYPE AND NATURE OF APHASIC SYMPTOMATOLOGY IN LANDAU-KLEFFNERS SYNDROME - A CASE-STUDY
    MARIEN, P
    SAERENS, J
    VERSLEGERS, W
    BORGGREVE, F
    DEDEYN, PP
    ACTA NEUROLOGICA BELGICA, 1993, 93 (04) : 183 - 203
  • [46] Helping aphasic patients accomplish greeting exchanges: Implications for stroke care in Thailand
    Wilainuch, Pairote
    JOURNAL OF INTERACTIONAL RESEARCH IN COMMUNICATION DISORDERS, 2020, 11 (02) : 151 - 170
  • [47] Comprehension of Idioms in Turkish Aphasic Participants
    Burcu Aydin
    Muzaffer Barin
    Oktay Yagiz
    Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 2017, 46 : 1485 - 1507
  • [48] Myelodysplastic syndrome: classification and prognostic systems
    Invernizzi, Rosangela
    Filocco, Agnese
    ONCOLOGY REVIEWS, 2010, 4 (01) : 25 - 33
  • [49] Epidemology and classification of diabetic foot syndrome
    Teichmann, J.
    Sabo, D.
    ORTHOPADE, 2009, 38 (12): : 1139 - +
  • [50] Definition, classification and diagnosis of fibromyalgia syndrome
    Eich, W.
    Haeuser, W.
    Friedel, E.
    Klement, A.
    Herrmann, M.
    Petzke, F.
    Offenbaecher, M.
    Schiltenwolf, M.
    Sommer, C.
    Toelle, T.
    Henningsen, P.
    SCHMERZ, 2008, 22 (03): : 255 - 266