Considerations for choosing an electronic medical record for an ophthalmology practice

被引:0
作者
DeBry, PW [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Ophthalmol & Visual Sci, Madison, WI USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Objectives: To give a brief overview of issues pertinent to selecting an ophthalmic electronic medical record (EMR) program and to outline the company demographics and software capabilities of the major vendors in this area. Methods: Software companies shipping an EMR package were contacted to obtain information on their software and company demographics. The focus was on companies selectively marketing to ophthalmology practices, and, therefore, most were selected based on their representation at the 1998 and/or 1999 American Academy of Ophthalmology meeting. Software companies that responded to repeated inquiries in a timely fashion were included. Results: Sixteen companies were evaluated. Electronic medical records packages ranged from $3000 to $80 000 (mean, approximately $30 000). Company demographics revealed a range from 1 to 1600 employees (mean, 204). Most of these companies have been in business for 6 years or less (range, 1-15 years; mean, 6 years). My opinions concerning various aspects of the EMR are presented. Conclusions: There is a wide range of EMR products available for the ophthalmology practice. Computer technology has matured to a paint at which the graphical demands of the ophthalmology EMR can be satisfied. Weaknesses do exist in the inherent difficulty of recording an ophthalmology encounter, the relative adolescence of software companies, and the lack of standards in the industry.
引用
收藏
页码:590 / 596
页数:7
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]  
*AM INF ASS, 1994, J AM MED INFORM ASSN, V1, P1
[2]   Using information systems to measure and improve quality [J].
Bates, DW ;
Pappius, E ;
Kuperman, GJ ;
Sittig, D ;
Burstin, H ;
Fairchild, D ;
Brennan, TA ;
Teich, JM .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 1999, 53 (2-3) :115-124
[3]   Critical assessment of healthcare informatics standards [J].
Korpman, RA ;
Dickinson, GL .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 1998, 48 (1-3) :125-132
[4]   What is done, what is needed and what is realistic to expect from medical informatics standards [J].
McDonald, CJ ;
Overhage, JM ;
Dexter, P ;
Takesue, B ;
Suico, JG .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 1998, 48 (1-3) :5-12
[5]   Spreadsheet evaluation of computerized medical records: The impact on quality, time, and money [J].
Pliskin, N ;
Glezerman, M ;
Modai, I ;
Weiler, D .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SYSTEMS, 1996, 20 (02) :85-100
[6]  
Taragin MI, 1998, J AM MED INFORM ASSN, P653
[7]   Economic evaluation of voice recognition for the clinicians' desktop at the Naval Hospital Roosevelt Roads [J].
Threet, E ;
Fargues, MP .
MILITARY MEDICINE, 1999, 164 (02) :119-126
[8]   Continuous speech recognition for clinicians [J].
Zafar, A ;
Overhage, JM ;
McDonald, CJ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 1999, 6 (03) :195-204