Nerve-sparing technique and urinary control after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy

被引:39
作者
Choi, Wesley W. [2 ]
Freire, Marcos P. [2 ]
Soukup, Jane R. [3 ]
Yin, Lei [2 ]
Lipsitz, Stuart R. [3 ]
Carvas, Fernando [2 ]
Williams, Stephen B. [1 ,2 ]
Hu, Jim C. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Urol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Sch Med, Div Urol Surg, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Sch Med, Ctr Surg & Publ Hlth, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Lank Ctr Genitourinary Oncol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
Radical prostatectomy; Continence; Outcomes; Nerve sparing; RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; URETHRAL SPHINCTER; RISK-FACTORS; CONTINENCE; PRESERVATION; INCONTINENCE; IMPACT; POTENCY; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1007/s00345-010-0601-z
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
To characterize determinants of 4-, 12-, and 24-month urinary control after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP). Adjusted comparative study using prospectively collected, patient self-reported urinary control for 602 consecutive RALPs. Urinary control defined as: (1) EPIC urinary function (UF) scored from 0 to 100 and (2) continence (zero pads per day). Both UF (62.8 vs. 42.4, P < 0.001) and continence rates (47.2 vs. 26.7%, P = 0.043) were better for bilateral nerve-sparing (BNS) vs. non-nerve-sparing (NNS) at 4 months, but only UF scores were significantly better at 12- (80.9 vs. 70.7, P = 0.014) and 24-month (89.2 vs. 77.4, P = 0.024) post-RALP. No difference in positive margin rates was observed. In multivariate analysis, older age (parameter estimate -0.42, 95% CI -0.80 to -0.04) and increasing gland volume (-0.13, CI -0.26 to -0.01) resulted in lower UF scores at 4 months, while higher pre-operative UF (0.25, CI 0.05-0.46), bladder neck-sparing technique (10.1, CI 3.79-16.35), BNS (19.1, CI 9.37-28.82), and unilateral nerve-sparing (19.00, CI 7.88-30.11) resulted in higher UF scores at 4 months. At 12 months, higher pre-operative UF (0.24, CI 0.083-0.40) and BNS (9.54, CI 1.92-17.16) resulted in higher UF scores. At 24 months, higher pre-operative UF (0.20, CI 0.06-0.33), bladder neck-sparing technique (7.80, CI 3.48-12.10), and BNS (7.86, CI 1.04-14.68) resulted in higher UF scores. BNS, bladder neck-sparing technique, and higher pre-operative UF score result in improved 24-month urinary control after RALP.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 27
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Landmarks for consistent nerve sparing during robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy [J].
Berry, Alexander ;
Korkes, Fernando ;
Hu, Jim C. .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2008, 22 (08) :1565-1567
[2]   Nerve sparing open radical retropubic prostatectomy - Does it have an impact on urinary continence? [J].
Burkhard, Fiona C. ;
Kessler, Thomas M. ;
Fleischmann, Achim ;
Thalmann, George N. ;
Schumacher, Martin ;
Studer, Urs E. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 176 (01) :189-195
[3]   Minimising postoperative incontinence following radical prostatectomy: Considerations and evidence [J].
Cambio, Angelo J. ;
Evans, Christopher P. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2006, 50 (05) :903-913
[4]   Risk factors for urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy [J].
Eastham, JA ;
Kattan, MW ;
Rogers, E ;
Goad, JR ;
Ohori, M ;
Boone, TB ;
Scardino, PT .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1996, 156 (05) :1707-1713
[5]  
FOOTE J, 1991, UROL CLIN N AM, V18, P229
[6]   Anatomic Bladder Neck Preservation During Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Description of Technique and Outcomes [J].
Freire, Marcos P. ;
Weinberg, Aaron C. ;
Lei, Yin ;
Soukup, Jane R. ;
Lipsitz, Stuart R. ;
Prasad, Sandip M. ;
Korkes, Fernando ;
Lin, Tiffany ;
Hu, Jim C. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2009, 56 (06) :972-980
[7]  
Guru KA, 2009, CAN J UROL, V16, P4736
[8]   Preservation of putative continence nerves during radical retropubic prostatectomy leads to more rapid return of urinary continence [J].
Hollabaugh, RS ;
Dmochowski, RR ;
Kneib, TG ;
Steiner, MS .
UROLOGY, 1998, 51 (06) :960-967
[9]   Comparative Effectiveness of Minimally Invasive vs Open Radical Prostatectomy [J].
Hu, Jim C. ;
Gu, Xiangmei ;
Lipsitz, Stuart R. ;
Barry, Michael J. ;
D'Amico, Anthony V. ;
Weinberg, Aaron C. ;
Keating, Nancy L. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2009, 302 (14) :1557-1564
[10]  
JOHN W, 2009, COMMUNICATION