The evidential reasoning approach for renewable energy resources evaluation under interval type-2 fuzzy uncertainty

被引:30
作者
Pan, Xiaohong [1 ]
Wang, Yingming [1 ,2 ]
He, Shifan [1 ]
机构
[1] Fuzhou Univ, Sch Decis Sci Inst, Fuzhou 350116, Fujian, Peoples R China
[2] Fuzhou Univ, Minist Educ, Key Lab Spatial Data Min & Informat Sharing, Fuzhou, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Renewable energy resources evaluation; Evidential reasoning approach; Interval type-2 fuzzy entropy; Enhanced minimax regret approach; GROUP DECISION-MAKING; ENTROPY; SETS; ALGORITHM; SELECTION; TURKEY; TOPSIS; MODEL; SCALE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ins.2021.06.091
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Selecting the right renewable energy resources (RESs) is emerging as a solution to alleviate energy crisis and environmental pollution. Due to the limitation of human knowledge and the complexity of reality, the selection process usually involves multiple uncertainties. In this paper, an interval type-2 fuzzy evidential reasoning approach is proposed to solve the RESs evaluation problem with uncertain information. First, the linguistic terms involved in the RESs evaluation process are encoded into the interval type-2 fuzzy sets (IT2FSs). Second, a new interval type-2 fuzzy distance model is developed to measure the distance between the IT2FSs. After obtaining the distance, two new information transformation techniques are respectively defined to transform the IT2FSs and the crisp numbers into the interval belief structures. Then, an interval type-2 fuzzy entropy measure is proposed to determine the weights of attributes and the corresponding axioms are proved mathe-matically. Finally, the interval expected utility of each alternative is generated by a pair of nonlinear optimization models and then ranked by an enhanced minimax regret approach. A case study about the RESs evaluation is provided to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach, comparisons and discussions are also conducted to show the superiority. (c) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:432 / 453
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
Abdullah Lazim, 2018, Applied Computing and Informatics, V14, P65, DOI 10.1016/j.aci.2017.04.003
[2]   Ranking of renewable energy sources for regions in Turkey by fuzzy entropy based fuzzy COPRAS and fuzzy MULTIMOORA [J].
Alkan, Omer ;
Albayrak, Ozlem Karadag .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2020, 162 :712-726
[3]   MADM method based on prospect theory and evidential reasoning approach with unknown attribute weights under intuitionistic fuzzy environment [J].
Bao, Tiantian ;
Xie, Xinlian ;
Long, Peiyin ;
Wei, Zhaokun .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2017, 88 :305-317
[4]   A decision-making computational methodology for a class of type-2 fuzzy intervals: An interval-based approach [J].
Boukezzoula, Reda ;
Coquin, Didier .
INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2020, 510 :256-282
[5]   Evaluation of Renewable Energy Resources in Turkey using an integrated MCDM approach with linguistic interval fuzzy preference relations [J].
Buyukozkan, Gulcin ;
Guleryuz, Sezin .
ENERGY, 2017, 123 :149-163
[6]   Prioritization of renewable energy alternatives by using an integrated fuzzy MCDM model: A real case application for Turkey [J].
Colak, Murat ;
Kaya, Ihsan .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 80 :840-853
[7]   Computing the Numerical Scale of the Linguistic Term Set for the 2-Tuple Fuzzy Linguistic Representation Model [J].
Dong, Yucheng ;
Xu, Yinfeng ;
Yu, Shui .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2009, 17 (06) :1366-1378
[8]   Generalized combination rule for evidential reasoning approach and Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence [J].
Du, Yuan-Wei ;
Zhong, Jiao-Jiao .
INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2021, 547 :1201-1232
[9]   An ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS-based SWOT analysis for Turkey's energy planning [J].
Ervural, Beyzanur Cayir ;
Zaim, Selim ;
Demirel, Omer F. ;
Aydin, Zeynep ;
Delen, Dursun .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2018, 82 :1538-1550
[10]   Decision analysis for sustainable development: The case of renewable energy planning under uncertainty [J].
Ezbakhe, Fatine ;
Perez-Foguet, Agusti .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2021, 291 (02) :601-613