To be or not to be a business responsible for sustainable development? Survey from small Czech businesses

被引:34
|
作者
Mikusova, Marie [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Ostrava, Dept Management, Fac Econ, Ostrava, Czech Republic
来源
ECONOMIC RESEARCH-EKONOMSKA ISTRAZIVANJA | 2017年 / 30卷 / 01期
关键词
Analytic hierarchy process; alternative; benefits; opportunities; costs and risks; Saaty's method; small business; sustainable development; ORGANIZATIONS; MANAGEMENT; ENTREPRENEURSHIP; ANP;
D O I
10.1080/1331677X.2017.1355257
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Sustainable development is influenced by the activities of both large businesses and small- and medium-sized businesses. The aim of this article is to identify the attitude of small businesses to sustainable development. The article presents the results of empirical research among managers of small businesses in the Czech Republic. A multi-criteria decision-making method (analytic hierarchy process) was used for the evaluation of relationship of these managers to sustainable development. A benefits, opportunities, costs and risks approach was applied for the structuring of the elements. The significance of the individual elements has been detected using Saaty's method. Three alternatives were formulated about the benefits to be a business that is interested in sustainability development. It was identified that the alternative, it is advantageous to be business interesting in sustainability development' is the most preferred. On the other hand, it was also identified, that managers will be responsible for sustainability development and their attitude must bring them benefits. This article contributes to the fulfilment of the research gap in the field of research related to small businesses and their surroundings. Identified impacts can be used for practical creation of conditions which would further encourage small businesses to take a proactive approach to sustainability development.
引用
收藏
页码:1318 / 1338
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Entrepreneurial responsible orientation in small and medium businesses: the case of Pakistan
    Khizar, Hafiz Muhammad Usman
    Iqbal, Jawad
    KYBERNETES, 2023, 52 (10) : 4340 - 4356
  • [12] Lessons for Responsible Innovation in the Business Context: A Systematic Literature Review of Responsible, Social and Sustainable Innovation Practices
    Lubberink, Rob
    Blok, Vincent
    van Ophem, Johan
    Omta, Onno
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 9 (05)
  • [13] FACTORS AND CONTRIBUTIONS OF SUSTAINABILITY IN BUSINESS PLANS FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF SUSTAINABLE BUSINESSES
    Tarupi Montenegro, Edisson Armando
    REVISTA UNIVERSIDAD Y SOCIEDAD, 2022, 14 : 332 - 342
  • [14] Determinants of business networking behaviour of women in small businesses
    Sharafizad, Jalleh
    SMALL ENTERPRISE RESEARCH, 2011, 18 (02): : 158 - 160
  • [15] State Support Programs and Its Role in the Sustainable Development of Small Business
    Khlutkov, Audrey D.
    Vlasova, Marina S.
    Kruglova, Inna A.
    Nazarov, Pavel, V
    VISION 2020: SUSTAINABLE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, AND GLOBAL GROWTH, VOLS I-IX, 2017, 2017, : 4201 - 4210
  • [16] 21-ST CENTURY LOGISTICS - TIME FOR RESPONSIBLE BUSINESS AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN A GLOBAL CONCEPT
    Kadlubek, Marta
    Szymczyk, Katarzyna
    GLOBALIZATION AND ITS SOCIO-ECONOMIC CONSEQUENCES, 2018, : 2120 - 2127
  • [17] To reform or preserve? Responsible leadership in community-oriented small businesses
    Anna-Mari Simunaniemi
    Emilia Kangas
    SN Business & Economics, 4 (12):
  • [18] Business Advisors and Small Businesses: Cooperation in the Framework of the Advisory Process
    Glodek, Pawel
    EURASIAN BUSINESS PERSPECTIVES, 2020, 15 (02): : 65 - 80
  • [19] Are small businesses better prepared for crises? Czech case
    Mikusova, Marie
    Horvathova, Petra
    JOURNAL OF CONTINGENCIES AND CRISIS MANAGEMENT, 2023, 31 (01) : 61 - 76
  • [20] Effects of Socially Responsible Supplier Development and Sustainability-Oriented Innovation on Sustainable Development: Empirical Evidence from SMEs
    Wu, Guo-Ciang
    CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2017, 24 (06) : 661 - 675