European exchange rate regimes and purchasing power parity: An empirical study on eleven eurozone countries

被引:28
作者
Huang, Chao-Hsi [1 ]
Yang, Chih-Yuan [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Tsing Hua Univ, Dept Econ, Hsin Chu City 30013, Taiwan
[2] Tainan Univ Technol, Dept Finance, Tainan 71002, Taiwan
关键词
Nominal exchange rate regime; Purchasing power parity; Real exchange rate; Panel unit root test; Error correction model; CONVERGENCE; CURRENCY; MARKET; TESTS; HOLD;
D O I
10.1016/j.iref.2014.09.008
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
It is widely believed that following the adoption of the euro, long run purchasing power parity (PPP) is more likely to hold within the euro countries. By applying the panel unit root test of Pesaran (2007) to real exchange rate data of eleven euro countries for the sample period of January 1957 to May 2013, we find that, contrary to the above intuition, the evidence for the mean-reverting in real exchange rates is much weaker in the post-1998 euro period than in the pre-euro period. In contrast, we find that for the four countries not using the euro: Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, and the UK, the evidence for the mean-reverting in real exchange rates is strong in both the pre- and post-euro (post-1998) periods. Moreover, through our panel estimation of the error correction model using the common correlated effects (CCE) estimators a la Pesaran (2006), we find that the flexibility of nominal exchange rates is crucial for the adjustment of real exchange rates to PPP. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:100 / 109
页数:10
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], INT REV EC FINANCE
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2004, WORKING PAPER EC NO
[3]  
[Anonymous], APPL FINANCIAL EC
[4]   Purchasing Power Parity and the European single currency: Some new evidence [J].
Christidou, Maria ;
Panagiotidis, Theodore .
ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2010, 27 (05) :1116-1123
[5]   EXPECTATIONS AND EXCHANGE-RATE DYNAMICS [J].
DORNBUSCH, R .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1976, 84 (06) :1161-1176
[6]  
Engel C, 2004, ECON POLICY, P347
[7]   Does the law of one price hold within the EU? A panel analysis [J].
Funke K. ;
Koske I. .
International Advances in Economic Research, 2008, 14 (1) :11-24
[8]   NOMINAL EXCHANGE-RATE REGIMES AND THE REAL EXCHANGE-RATE - EVIDENCE FROM THE UNITED-STATES AND GREAT-BRITAIN, 1885-1986 [J].
GRILLI, V ;
KAMINSKY, G .
JOURNAL OF MONETARY ECONOMICS, 1991, 27 (02) :191-212
[9]   COINTEGRATION, ERROR CORRECTION, AND PURCHASING POWER PARITY BETWEEN CANADA AND THE UNITED-STATES [J].
JOHNSON, DR .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS-REVUE CANADIENNE D ECONOMIQUE, 1990, 23 (04) :839-855
[10]   Purchasing power parity and the euro area [J].
Koedijk, KG ;
Tims, B ;
van Dijk, MA .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MONEY AND FINANCE, 2004, 23 (7-8) :1081-1107