Territorial threat and women's legislative representation

被引:9
作者
Kang, Alice J. [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Nam Kyu [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nebraska, Dept Polit Sci, Lincoln, NE USA
[2] Univ Nebraska, Inst Ethn Studies, Lincoln, NE USA
[3] Korea Univ, Dept Polit Sci & Int Relat, Seoul, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
gender; women in politics; women's representation; territory; threat; militarization; POLITICAL REPRESENTATION; GENDER STEREOTYPES; NATIONAL-SECURITY; ELECTORAL SYSTEMS; ARMED CONFLICT; IMPACT; WAR; DEFENSE; QUOTAS; NORMS;
D O I
10.1080/13510347.2019.1700953
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Why do some countries have fewer women in parliament than do others? Recent studies find that women have less access to positions of political power in countries facing external threats. Existing studies, however, do not differentiate between types of threat. We theorize that territorial threats are a particular driver of gender inequality in national parliaments. When a country's land is under threat, people prefer having "tough" representatives in the national legislature who are competent on the military and defence more so than when a country faces other threats. Moreover, when countries face territorial threats, they build larger standing armies and adopt military conscription, raising the level of militarization in society, which negatively influences women's access to the national legislature. Using a time-series cross-sectional data set of 101 democracies, we find that countries facing external territorial threats have lower percentages of women in parliament compared to countries facing other or no external threats. Additionally, we find that countries with higher levels of militarization have fewer women in the national legislature.
引用
收藏
页码:340 / 358
页数:19
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]   Liberia's Election of Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf and Women's Executive Leadership in Africa [J].
Adams, Melinda .
POLITICS & GENDER, 2008, 4 (03) :475-484
[2]  
Angrist JD, 2009, MOSTLY HARMLESS ECONOMETRICS: AN EMPIRICISTS COMPANION, P1
[3]   I Want You! The Determinants of Military Conscription [J].
Asal, Victor ;
Conrad, Justin ;
Toronto, Nathan .
JOURNAL OF CONFLICT RESOLUTION, 2017, 61 (07) :1456-1481
[4]   Defending the Realm: The Appointment of Female Defense Ministers Worldwide [J].
Barnes, Tiffany D. ;
O'Brien, Diana Z. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2018, 62 (02) :355-368
[5]   Legislative Gender Diversity and the Resolution of Civil Conflict [J].
Best, Rebecca H. ;
Shair-Rosenfield, Sarah ;
Wood, Reed M. .
POLITICAL RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 2019, 72 (01) :215-228
[6]   A Complete Data Set of Political Regimes, 1800-2007 [J].
Boix, Carles ;
Miller, Michael ;
Rosato, Sebastian .
COMPARATIVE POLITICAL STUDIES, 2013, 46 (12) :1523-1554
[7]   Democratic Electoral Systems around the world, 1946-2011 [J].
Bormann, Nils-Christian ;
Golder, Matt .
ELECTORAL STUDIES, 2013, 32 (02) :360-369
[8]   Gendered conflict [J].
Caprioli, M .
JOURNAL OF PEACE RESEARCH, 2000, 37 (01) :51-68
[9]   The Arc of Modernization: Economic Structure, Materialism, and the Onset of Civil Conflict [J].
Chatagnier, J. Tyson ;
Castelli, Emanuele .
POLITICAL SCIENCE RESEARCH AND METHODS, 2019, 7 (02) :233-252
[10]  
Cherif F.M., 2015, Myths About Women's Rights: How, Where and Why Rights Advance