STRUCTURAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SOIL INVERTEBRATE COMMUNITIES FROM TWO FRAGMENTED NATURA 2000 SITES FROM ROMANIA

被引:0
作者
Manu, Minodora [1 ]
Chiriac, Luiza-Silvia [1 ]
Onete, Marilena [1 ]
机构
[1] Romanian Acad, Inst Biol Bucharest, Dept Ecol Taxon & Nat Conservat, St Splaiul Independentei 296,POB 56-53, Bucharest 0603100, Romania
来源
SCIENTIFIC PAPERS-SERIES D-ANIMAL SCIENCE | 2021年 / 64卷 / 01期
关键词
fragment; invertebrate; soil; structure; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; FOREST; FAUNA; DECOMPOSITION; BIODIVERSITY; MANAGEMENT; DIVERSITY; POLLUTION; GRADIENT; EUROPE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Wetland ecosystems are dependent of groundwater. They provide goods and ecosystem services. Any anthropic activity will affect their structure. This ecological damage could be revealed by using the biological indicators, as soil invertebrate communities. In 2018, two fragmented Natura 2000 sites were studied: Forest and Eutrophic Marshes from Prejmer (ROSCI0170) and Lempes Fortress Hill-Harman Marsh (ROSCI0055). 80 soil samples were investigated, from four fragments in each sites. Two structural parameters were analysed: numerical abundance and constancy. In total, 19 taxa were identified, with 1108 individuals. The highest values of numerical abundances were obtained by the Oribatida mites and Collembola. In Prejmer, 23.52% from the total number of taxa were euconstant, 17.64% constant, 41.17% accessory and 17.64% accidental. The soil fauna from Harman was represented only by accessory (53.84%) and accidental taxa (46.15%). The dominance of the accidental and accessory taxa demonstrating that the two protected area were not characterized by stable communities. The canonical analysis revealed that the type of habitat influenced the spatial distribution of soil invertebrate communities, defining distinct groups for marsh ecosystems, alluvial forests and deciduous forests.
引用
收藏
页码:529 / 535
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Assessment of soil biological degradation using mesofauna
    Camilo Bedano, Jose
    Dominguez, Anahi
    Arolfo, Romina
    [J]. SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 2011, 117 : 55 - 60
  • [2] Daily G. C., 1997, ISSUES ECOLOGY, V2, P1
  • [3] Dindal DL., 1990, SOIL BIOL GUIDE
  • [4] A functional methodology for determining the groundwater regime needed to maintain the health of groundwater-dependent vegetation
    Eamus, D
    Froend, R
    Loomes, R
    Hose, G
    Murray, B
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2006, 54 (02) : 97 - 114
  • [5] Ecosystem services: an ecophysiological examination
    Eamus, D
    Macinnis-Ng, CMO
    Hose, GC
    Zeppel, MJB
    Taylor, DT
    Murray, BR
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2005, 53 (01) : 1 - 19
  • [6] Soil biodiversity monitoring in Europe: ongoing activities and challenges
    Gardi, C.
    Montanarella, L.
    Arrouays, D.
    Bispo, A.
    Lemanceau, P.
    Jolivet, C.
    Mulder, C.
    Ranjard, L.
    Roembke, J.
    Rutgers, M.
    Menta, C.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 2009, 60 (05) : 807 - 819
  • [7] Hammer Oyvind, 2001, Palaeontologia Electronica, V4, pUnpaginated
  • [8] HERLITZIUS H, 1987, BIOL FERT SOILS, V3, P85, DOI 10.1007/BF00260584
  • [9] Huhta Veikko, 2010, Memoranda Societatis pro Fauna et Flora Fennica, V86, P59
  • [10] Groundwater dependent ecosystems. Part II. Ecosystem services and management in Europe under risk of climate change and land use intensification
    Klove, Bjorn
    Allan, Andrew
    Bertrand, Guillaume
    Druzynska, Elzbieta
    Erturk, Ali
    Goldscheider, Nico
    Henry, Sarah
    Karakaya, Nusret
    Karjalainen, Timo P.
    Koundouri, Phoebe
    Kupfersberger, Hans
    Kvaerner, Jens
    Lundberg, Angela
    Muotka, Timo
    Preda, Elena
    Pulido-Velazquez, Manuel
    Schipper, Peter
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2011, 14 (07) : 782 - 793