Image Noise, CNR, and Detectability of Low-Contrast, Low-Attenuation Liver Lesions in a Phantom: Effects of Radiation Exposure, Phantom Size, Integrated Circuit Detector, and Iterative Reconstruction

被引:37
作者
Goenka, Ajit H. [1 ]
Herts, Brian R. [1 ]
Dong, Frank [2 ]
Obuchowski, Nancy A. [3 ]
Primak, Andrew N. [4 ]
Karim, Wadih [1 ]
Baker, Mark E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin, Imaging Inst, Sect Abdominal Imaging, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[2] Cleveland Clin, Imaging Inst, Sect Med Phys, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[3] Cleveland Clin, Dept Quantitat Hlth Sci, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[4] Siemens Med Solut, Malvern, PA USA
关键词
COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; OBESE-PATIENTS; ABDOMINAL CT; QUALITY; IMPACT; MDCT; ROC;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2016151621
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To assess image noise, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and detectability of low-contrast, low-attenuation liver lesions in a semianthropomorphic phantom by using either a discrete circuit (DC) detector and filtered back projection (FBP) or an integrated circuit (IC) detector and iterative reconstruction (IR) with changes in radiation exposure and phantom size. Materials and Methods: An anthropomorphic phantom without or with a 5-cm-thick fat-mimicking ring (widths, 30 and 40 cm) containing liver inserts with four spherical lesions was scanned with five exposure settings on each of two computed tomography scanners, one equipped with a DC detector and the other with an IC detector. Images from the DC and IC detector scanners were reconstructed with FBP and IR, respectively. Image noise and lesion CNR were measured. Four radiologists evaluated lesion presence on a five-point diagnostic confidence scale. Data analyses included receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and noninferiority analysis. Results: The combination of IC and IR significantly reduced image noise (P < .001) (with the greatest reduction in the 40-cm phantom and at lower exposures) and improved lesion CNR (P < .001). There was no significant difference in area under the ROC curve between detector-reconstruction combinations at fixed exposure for either phantom. Reader accuracy with IC-IR was noninferior at 50% (100 mAs [effective]) and 25% (300 mAs [effective]) exposure reduction for the 30- and 40-cm phantoms, respectively (adjusted P < .001 and .04 respectively). IC-IR improved readers' confidence in the presence of a lesion (P = .029) independent of phantom size or exposure level. Conclusion: IC-IR improved objective image quality and lesion detection confidence but did not result in superior diagnostic accuracy when compared with DC-FBP. Moderate exposure reductions maintained comparable diagnostic accuracy for both detectorreconstruction combinations. Lesion detection in the 40-cm phantom was inferior at smaller exposure reduction than in the 30-cm phantom.
引用
收藏
页码:475 / 482
页数:8
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] How to Demonstrate Similarity by Using Noninferiority and Equivalence Statistical Testing in Radiology Research
    Ahn, Soyeon
    Park, Seong Ho
    Lee, Kyoung Ho
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2013, 267 (02) : 328 - 338
  • [2] Contrast-to-Noise Ratio and Low-Contrast Object Resolution on Full- and Low-Dose MDCT: SAFIRE Versus Filtered Back Projection in a Low-Contrast Object Phantom and in the Liver
    Baker, Mark E.
    Dong, Frank
    Primak, Andrew
    Obuchowski, Nancy A.
    Einstein, David
    Gandhi, Namita
    Herts, Brian R.
    Purysko, Andrei
    Remer, Erick
    Vachani, Neil
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2012, 199 (01) : 8 - 18
  • [3] Potential of combining iterative reconstruction with noise efficient detector design: aggressive dose reduction in head CT
    Brodoefel, H.
    Bender, B.
    Schabel, C.
    Fenchel, M.
    Ernemann, U.
    Korn, A.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2015, 88 (1050)
  • [4] COMPARING THE AREAS UNDER 2 OR MORE CORRELATED RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES - A NONPARAMETRIC APPROACH
    DELONG, ER
    DELONG, DM
    CLARKEPEARSON, DI
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 1988, 44 (03) : 837 - 845
  • [5] Noise-reducing algorithms do not necessarily provide superior dose optimisation for hepatic lesion detection with multidetector CT
    Dobeli, K. L.
    Lewis, S. J.
    Meikle, S. R.
    Thiele, D. L.
    Brennan, P. C.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2013, 86 (1023)
  • [6] Electronic Noise in CT Detectors: Impact on Image Noise and Artifacts
    Duan, Xinhui
    Wang, Jia
    Leng, Shuai
    Schmidt, Bernhard
    Allmendinger, Thomas
    Grant, Katharine
    Flohr, Thomas
    McCollough, Cynthia H.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2013, 201 (04) : W626 - W632
  • [7] Pilot Study of Detection, Radiologist Confidence and Image Quality With Sinogram-Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction at Half-Routine Dose Level
    Fletcher, Joel G.
    Krueger, William R.
    Hough, David M.
    Huprich, James E.
    Fidler, Jeff L.
    Wang, Jia
    Shiung, Maria M.
    Harmsen, W. Scott
    Grant, Katharine L.
    McCollough, Cynthia H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2013, 37 (02) : 203 - 211
  • [8] Effect of Reduced Radiation Exposure and Iterative Reconstruction on Detection of LowContrast Low-A ttenuation Lesions in an Anthropomorphic Liver Phantom: An 18-Reader Study
    Goenka, Ajit H.
    Herts, Brian R.
    Obuchowski, Nancy A.
    Primak, Andrew N.
    Dong, Frank
    Karim, Wadih
    Baker, Mark E.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2014, 272 (01) : 154 - 163
  • [9] Radiation Dose Reduction With Sinogram Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction Technique for Abdominal Computed Tomography
    Kalra, Mannudeep K.
    Woisetschlager, Mischa
    Dahlstrom, Nils
    Singh, Sarabjeet
    Lindblom, Maria
    Choy, Garry
    Quick, Petter
    Schmidt, Bernhard
    Sedlmair, Martin
    Blake, Michael A.
    Persson, Anders
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2012, 36 (03) : 339 - 346
  • [10] Image Noise and Liver Lesion Detection With MDCT: A Phantom Study
    Kanal, Kalpana M.
    Chung, Jonathan H.
    Wang, Jin
    Bhargava, Puneet
    Kohr, Jennifer R.
    Shuman, William P.
    Stewart, Brent K.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2011, 197 (02) : 437 - 441