Medication Reconciliation: Barriers and Facilitators from the Perspectives of Resident Physicians and Pharmacists

被引:69
作者
Boockvar, Kenneth S. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Santos, Susan L. [4 ,5 ]
Kushniruk, Andre [6 ]
Johnson, Christopher [7 ,8 ,9 ]
Nebeker, Jonathan R. [10 ,11 ]
机构
[1] James J Peters VA Med Ctr, Geriatr Res Educ & Clin Ctr, Bronx, NY 10468 USA
[2] Mt Sinai Sch Med, Dept Geriatr & Palliat Med, New York, NY USA
[3] Jewish Home Lifecare, New York, NY USA
[4] VA New Jersey Hlth Care Syst, E Orange, NJ USA
[5] Univ Med & Dent New Jersey, Dept Hlth Educ & Behav Sci, New Brunswick, NJ USA
[6] Univ Victoria, Sch Hlth Informat Sci, Victoria, BC, Canada
[7] Texas A&M Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, College Stn, TX USA
[8] VA S Cent Mental Illness Res Educ & Clin Ctr, Houston, TX USA
[9] Michael E Debakey VA Med Ctr, Houston Ctr Qual Care & Utilizat Studies, Houston, TX USA
[10] Univ Utah, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[11] VA Geriatr Res Educ & Clin Ctr, Salt Lake City, UT USA
关键词
ADVERSE DRUG EVENTS;
D O I
10.1002/jhm.891
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Medication reconciliation can prevent medication errors and harm when patients transition between hospital and other care settings. Though a Joint Commission hospital Patient Safety Goal since 2006, organizations continue to have difficulty implementing the process. OBJECTIVE: To determine factors that influence performance of medication reconciliation in a hospital setting with a computerized medication reconciliation tool. DESIGN: Cognitive task analysis (CTA) and focus group interviews. SETTING: Urban, academic, tertiary-care Veterans Affairs medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Internal medicine house staff physicians (n = 23) and inpatient staff pharmacists (n = 12). MEASUREMENTS: CTA participants verbalized their thoughts while they completed medication reconciliation with the computerized tool. Focus group participants described medication reconciliation's purpose and effectiveness, how they completed the task, and its barriers and facilitators. Interviews were recorded and analyzed using social science methods for analyzing qualitative data. RESULTS: Participants agreed that a central goal of medication reconciliation is to prevent prescribing errors, but disagreed about whether it achieves this goal. Computerization facilitated the task, but participants said that computers and patients can be unreliable sources of information. Participants varied in how they sequenced components of the task. When time was limited, physicians considered other responsibilities higher priority. Both physicians and pharmacists expressed low self-efficacy, ie, low perceived capability to achieve the objectives of the process. CONCLUSION: Key barriers to medication reconciliation are unreliable sources of medication information and tasks that compete for providers' time and attention that they consider higher priority. Addressing these barriers while increasing providers' self-efficacy might improve medication reconciliation and its outcomes. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2011;6:329-337. (C) 2011 Society of Hospital Medicine
引用
收藏
页码:329 / 337
页数:9
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1994, Qualitative data analysis, DOI DOI 10.1080/0140528790010406
[2]   Electronic health records and adverse drug events after patient transfer [J].
Boockvar, K. S. ;
Livote, E. E. ;
Goldstein, N. ;
Nebeker, J. R. ;
Siu, A. ;
Fried, T. .
QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2010, 19 (05)
[3]  
Boockvar Kenneth S, 2006, Am J Geriatr Pharmacother, V4, P236, DOI 10.1016/j.amjopharm.2006.09.003
[4]  
*DAN SOC PAT SAF, DAN SOC PAT SAF OP L
[5]   The general public's information needs and perceptions regarding hereditary cancer: an application of the Integrated Change Model [J].
de Vries, H ;
Mesters, I ;
van de Steeg, H ;
Honing, C .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2005, 56 (02) :154-165
[6]  
Flick U, 2018, INTRO QUALITATIVE RE, V6th
[7]  
*JOINT COMM, JOINT COMM HOSP NAT
[8]  
*JOINT COMM, UPD MED REC NAT PAT
[9]   Patient transfer from nursing home to emergency department: Outcomes and policy implications [J].
Jones, JS ;
Dwyer, PR ;
White, LJ ;
Firman, R .
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1997, 4 (09) :908-915
[10]  
Kaboli PJ, 2004, AM J MANAG CARE, V10, P872