Cranial movements during suction feeding in teleost fishes: Are they modified to enhance suction production?

被引:60
作者
Gibb, AC [1 ]
Ferry-Graham, L
机构
[1] No Arizona Univ, Dept Biol, Flagstaff, AZ 86011 USA
[2] Calif State Univ, Moss Landing Marine Labs, Moss Landing, CA 95039 USA
关键词
kinematics; prey capture; feeding habits; benthic feeder; cranial morphology;
D O I
10.1016/j.zool.2005.03.004
中图分类号
Q95 [动物学];
学科分类号
071002 ;
摘要
Suction is produced during prey capture by most teleost fishes. Here, we ask two questions about the functional basis of suction feeding. First, is there variation in the kinematic pattern produced by different species while suction feeding? Second, do species termed 'suction specialists' demonstrate similar modifications to their feeding behavior? We used 10 kinematic variables in a principal component analysis to identify axes of variation among 14 suction feeding teleost species (representing nine families and five orders within the Euteleostei) that demonstrate different feeding habits and habitats. MANOVA and Tukey post hoc tests were used to assess differences among species. Most species clustered together on the principal component axes, suggesting a generalized mechanism that facilitates unidirectional flow. Typically, only one species stood out as 'extreme' on each functional axis, and a species that stood out on one axis did not stand out on others. Only one species, the flatfish Pleuronichthys verticalis, an obligate benthic feeder, demonstrated modifications consistent with enhanced suction production. This species displayed a suite of changes that should enhance suction production, including large hyoid depression, large cranial rotation, and small gape. We suggest that suction performance may be greatest in such obligate benthic feeders because cranial morphology is highly modified and prey are captured from the substrate. (C) 2005 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:141 / 153
页数:13
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
ALEXANDER RM, 1967, J ZOOL, V151, P43
[2]  
Alfaro ME, 2001, AM ZOOL, V41, P1266, DOI 10.1668/0003-1569(2001)041[1266:MCATSM]2.0.CO
[3]  
2
[4]   Forward attack modes of aquatic feeding garter snakes [J].
Alfaro, ME .
FUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY, 2002, 16 (02) :204-215
[5]  
ALLEN MJ, 1982, THESIS U CALIFORNIA
[6]  
BAREL CDN, 1983, NETH J ZOOL, V33, P357
[7]   Morphology and kinematics of prey capture in the syngnathid fishes Hippocampus erectus and Syngnathus floridae [J].
Bergert, BA ;
Wainwright, PC .
MARINE BIOLOGY, 1997, 127 (04) :563-570
[8]   Functional morphology of prey capture in the sturgeon, Scaphirhynchus albus [J].
Carroll, AM ;
Wainwright, PC .
JOURNAL OF MORPHOLOGY, 2003, 256 (03) :270-284
[9]   Morphology predicts suction feeding performance in centrarchid fishes [J].
Carroll, AM ;
Wainwright, PC ;
Huskey, SH ;
Collar, DC ;
Turingan, RG .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2004, 207 (22) :3873-3881
[10]  
Cook A, 1996, J EXP BIOL, V199, P1961