Diagnostic utility of three Tesla diffusion tensor imaging in prostate cancer: correlation with Gleason score values

被引:0
|
作者
Abouelkheir, Rasha Taha [1 ]
Aboshamia, Yasmin Ibrahim [1 ]
Taman, Saher Ebrahim [2 ]
机构
[1] Mansoura Univ, Urol & Nephrol Ctr, Radiol Dept, Mansoura, Egypt
[2] Mansoura Univ, Fac Med, Radiol Dept, Mansoura, Egypt
关键词
Fractional anisotropy; Mean diffusivity; Prostate cancer; Diffusion tensor imaging; Gleason score; ANTIGEN; BIOPSY; SYSTEM; MRI; AGE;
D O I
10.1186/s43055-022-00892-z
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: Preoperative assessment of prostate cancer (PCa) aggressiveness is a prerequisite to provide specific management options. The Gleason score (GS) obtained from prostatic biopsy or surgery is crucial for the evaluation of PCa aggressiveness and personalized treatment planning. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) provides valuable information about microstructural properties of prostatic tissue. The most common prostate DTI measures are the fractional anisotropy (FA) and median diffusivity (MD) can give more information regarding the biophysical characteristics of prostate tissue. We aimed to explore the correlation of these DTI parameters with GS levels in PCa patients that can affect the management protocol of PCa. Results: The computed area under curve (AUC) of the FA values used to differentiate cancer patients from control group was (0.90) with cutoff point to differentiate both groups were >= 0.245. The computed sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were (84%, 80%, 95.5%, and 50%), respectively, with accuracy 83.3%. FA showed high positive correlation with Gleason score (p value <0.001). Median diffusivity (MD) showed negative correlation with GS with statistically significant results (p value = 0.013). PCa fiber bundles were dense, orderly arranged, without interruption in the low grade, and slightly disorganized in the intermediate group. However, in the high-grade group, the fiber bundles were interrupted, irregularly arranged, and absent at the site of cancerous foci. Conclusions: Combined quantitative parameter values (FA and MD values) and parametric diagrams (FA and DTI maps) can be utilized to evaluate prostate cancer aggressiveness and prognosis, helping in the improvement of the management protocol of PCa patients.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging and Standard Mono-Exponential Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Diagnosis of Significant Prostate Cancer-A Correlation with Gleason Score Assessed on Whole-Mount Histopathology Specimens
    Zurowska, Anna
    Peksa, Rafal
    Grzywinska, Malgorzata
    Panas, Damian
    Sowa, Marek
    Skrobisz, Katarzyna
    Matuszewski, Marcin
    Szurowska, Edyta
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2023, 13 (02)
  • [42] Prostate cancer aggressive prediction: preponderant diagnostic performances of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) imaging and diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) beyond ADC at 3.0 T scanner with gleason score at final pathology
    Yingchan Shan
    Xiaoshan Chen
    Kai Liu
    Mengsu Zeng
    Jianjun Zhou
    Abdominal Radiology, 2019, 44 : 3441 - 3452
  • [43] Multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging of prostate cancer: correlation between Ktrans, Gleason score, and PI-RADS score
    Stefano Nardacci
    Tommaso Biondi
    Domenico De Santis
    Marta Zerunian
    Michela Polici
    Nicola Panvini
    Marco Rengo
    Davide Bellini
    Riccardo Ferrari
    Pasquale Paolantonio
    Damiano Caruso
    Andrea Laghi
    Journal of Medical Imaging and Interventional Radiology, 11 (1):
  • [44] Diffusion-Weighted and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI of Prostate Cancer: Correlation of Quantitative MR Parameters With Gleason Score and Tumor Angiogenesis
    Oto, Aytekin
    Yang, Cheng
    Kayhan, Arda
    Tretiakova, Maria
    Antic, Tatjana
    Schmid-Tannwald, Christine
    Eggener, Scott
    Karczmar, Gregory S.
    Stadler, Walter M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2011, 197 (06) : 1382 - 1390
  • [45] Evaluation of Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness Using the Ratio of Diffusion Tensor Imaging Measures
    Onay, Aslihan
    Ertas, Gokhan
    Vural, Metin
    Acar, Omer
    Saglican, Yesim
    Coskun, Bilgen
    Akpek, Sergin
    CONTRAST MEDIA & MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2017,
  • [46] Role of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to predict postoperative Gleason score upgrading in prostate cancer with Gleason score 3 + 4
    Hwanik Kim
    Jung Kwon Kim
    Sung Kyu Hong
    Chang Wook Jeong
    Ja Hyeon Ku
    Cheol Kwak
    World Journal of Urology, 2021, 39 : 1825 - 1830
  • [47] Diffusion-Weighted MRI of Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer: Comparison of Tumor Apparent Diffusion Coefficient With Gleason Score and Percentage of Tumor on Core Biopsy
    Woodfield, Courtney A.
    Tung, Glenn A.
    Grand, David J.
    Pezzullo, John A.
    Machan, Jason T.
    Renzulli, Joseph F., II
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2010, 194 (04) : W316 - W322
  • [48] Apparent Diffusion Coefficient for Prostate Cancer Imaging: Impact of b Values
    Peng, Yahui
    Jiang, Yulei
    Antic, Tatjana
    Sethi, Ila
    Schmid-Tannwald, Christine
    Eggener, Scott
    Oto, Aytekin
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2014, 202 (03) : W247 - W253
  • [49] Angiogenic Index as a Measure of Angiogenesis in Prostate Cancer and Its Correlation with Gleason Grade and Score
    Prakash, Shikha
    Singh, Prashant
    Nagayach, Pooja
    Singh, Kalpana
    Bharti, Rajni
    Prakash, Gunjan
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2022, 16 (12) : 5 - 9
  • [50] The Histogram Analysis of Diffusion-Weighted Intravoxel Incoherent Motion (IVIM) Imaging for Differentiating the Gleason grade of Prostate Cancer
    Yu-Dong Zhang
    Qing Wang
    Chen-Jiang Wu
    Xiao-Ning Wang
    Jing Zhang
    Hui Liu
    Xi-Sheng Liu
    Hai-Bin Shi
    European Radiology, 2015, 25 : 994 - 1004