Diagnostic utility of three Tesla diffusion tensor imaging in prostate cancer: correlation with Gleason score values

被引:0
|
作者
Abouelkheir, Rasha Taha [1 ]
Aboshamia, Yasmin Ibrahim [1 ]
Taman, Saher Ebrahim [2 ]
机构
[1] Mansoura Univ, Urol & Nephrol Ctr, Radiol Dept, Mansoura, Egypt
[2] Mansoura Univ, Fac Med, Radiol Dept, Mansoura, Egypt
关键词
Fractional anisotropy; Mean diffusivity; Prostate cancer; Diffusion tensor imaging; Gleason score; ANTIGEN; BIOPSY; SYSTEM; MRI; AGE;
D O I
10.1186/s43055-022-00892-z
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: Preoperative assessment of prostate cancer (PCa) aggressiveness is a prerequisite to provide specific management options. The Gleason score (GS) obtained from prostatic biopsy or surgery is crucial for the evaluation of PCa aggressiveness and personalized treatment planning. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) provides valuable information about microstructural properties of prostatic tissue. The most common prostate DTI measures are the fractional anisotropy (FA) and median diffusivity (MD) can give more information regarding the biophysical characteristics of prostate tissue. We aimed to explore the correlation of these DTI parameters with GS levels in PCa patients that can affect the management protocol of PCa. Results: The computed area under curve (AUC) of the FA values used to differentiate cancer patients from control group was (0.90) with cutoff point to differentiate both groups were >= 0.245. The computed sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were (84%, 80%, 95.5%, and 50%), respectively, with accuracy 83.3%. FA showed high positive correlation with Gleason score (p value <0.001). Median diffusivity (MD) showed negative correlation with GS with statistically significant results (p value = 0.013). PCa fiber bundles were dense, orderly arranged, without interruption in the low grade, and slightly disorganized in the intermediate group. However, in the high-grade group, the fiber bundles were interrupted, irregularly arranged, and absent at the site of cancerous foci. Conclusions: Combined quantitative parameter values (FA and MD values) and parametric diagrams (FA and DTI maps) can be utilized to evaluate prostate cancer aggressiveness and prognosis, helping in the improvement of the management protocol of PCa patients.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Prostate imaging reporting and data system correlation with Gleason score: Pathological aspects of magnetic resonance imaging findings
    Yokoo, Patricia
    de Oliveira Salvador, Gabriel Lucca
    Andre Quintana Castillo, Jesus Jose
    Nicoletti Basso, Ana Carolina
    do Amaral, Rafael Sarmento
    Pelaez de Campos, Rafael Olinto
    Ykeda Barreto, Renan Arrais
    Ghattas Orozco, Oscar Fernando
    Cavalli, Alexandre Cavalheiro
    Zaparolli, Mauricio
    UROLOGIA JOURNAL, 2019, 86 (04) : 189 - 196
  • [32] Prostate Volumes Derived From MRI and Volume-Adjusted Serum Prostate-Specific Antigen: Correlation With Gleason Score of Prostate Cancer
    Karademir, Ibrahim
    Shen, Dinggang
    Peng, Yahui
    Liao, Shu
    Jiang, Yulei
    Yousuf, Ambereen
    Karczmar, Gregory
    Sammet, Steffen
    Wang, Shiyang
    Medved, Milica
    Antic, Tatjana
    Eggener, Scott
    Oto, Aytekin
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2013, 201 (05) : 1041 - 1048
  • [33] Prostate Specific Antigen and Gleason Score in Men with Prostate Cancer at a Private Diagnostic Radiology Centre in Western Jamaica
    Anderson-Jackson, Lennox
    McGrowder, Donovan A.
    Alexander-Lindo, Ruby
    ASIAN PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2012, 13 (04) : 1453 - 1456
  • [34] Differentiation of prostate cancer lesions with high and with low Gleason score by diffusion-weighted MRI
    Barbieri, Sebastiano
    Bronnimann, Michael
    Boxler, Silvan
    Vermathen, Peter
    Thoeny, Harriet C.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2017, 27 (04) : 1547 - 1555
  • [35] Relationship between Gleason score and apparent diffusion coefficients of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer patients
    Kim, Tae Heon
    Kim, Chan Kyo
    Park, Byung Kwan
    Jeon, Hwang Gyun
    Jeong, Byung Chang
    Seo, Seong Il
    Lee, Hyun Moo
    Choi, Han Yong
    Jeon, Seong Soo
    CUAJ-CANADIAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2016, 10 (11-12): : E377 - E382
  • [36] Characterization of prostate cancer using diffusion tensor imaging: A new perspective
    Gholizadeh, Neda
    Greer, Peter B.
    Simpson, John
    Denham, Jim
    Lau, Peter
    Dowling, Jason
    Hondermarck, Hubert
    Ramadan, Saadallah
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2019, 110 : 112 - 120
  • [37] Comprehensive diagnostic model of metastasis in prostate cancer: Individual and combined bioscore model of ADC value, Gleason score, and PSA
    Frimpong, George Asafu Adjaye
    Aboagye, Evans
    Owusu-Afriyie, Osei
    Gyasi-Sarpong, Kofi Christian
    Asare, Adwoa
    Adofo, Charles Kwame
    Akpaloo, Bernard Delali
    Asante, Emmanuel
    Osei-Bonsu, Ernest
    PRECISION MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2024, 13 (03): : 140 - 147
  • [38] Prostate cancer: correlation of intravoxel incoherent motion MR parameters with Gleason score
    Yang, Dal Mo
    Kim, Hyun Cheol
    Kim, Sang Won
    Jahng, Geon-Ho
    Won, Kyu Yeoun
    Lim, Sung Jig
    Oh, Jang-Hoon
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2016, 40 (03) : 445 - 450
  • [39] Predictive and prognostic values of Tau and BubR1 protein in prostate cancer and their relationship to the Gleason score
    Cirak, Yalcin
    Sarsik, Banu
    Cakar, Burcu
    Sen, Sait
    Simsir, Adnan
    Uslu, Ruchan
    MEDICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 30 (02)
  • [40] Predictive and prognostic values of Tau and BubR1 protein in prostate cancer and their relationship to the Gleason score
    Yalcin Cirak
    Banu Sarsik
    Burcu Cakar
    Sait Sen
    Adnan Simsir
    Ruchan Uslu
    Medical Oncology, 2013, 30