Diagnostic utility of three Tesla diffusion tensor imaging in prostate cancer: correlation with Gleason score values

被引:0
|
作者
Abouelkheir, Rasha Taha [1 ]
Aboshamia, Yasmin Ibrahim [1 ]
Taman, Saher Ebrahim [2 ]
机构
[1] Mansoura Univ, Urol & Nephrol Ctr, Radiol Dept, Mansoura, Egypt
[2] Mansoura Univ, Fac Med, Radiol Dept, Mansoura, Egypt
关键词
Fractional anisotropy; Mean diffusivity; Prostate cancer; Diffusion tensor imaging; Gleason score; ANTIGEN; BIOPSY; SYSTEM; MRI; AGE;
D O I
10.1186/s43055-022-00892-z
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: Preoperative assessment of prostate cancer (PCa) aggressiveness is a prerequisite to provide specific management options. The Gleason score (GS) obtained from prostatic biopsy or surgery is crucial for the evaluation of PCa aggressiveness and personalized treatment planning. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) provides valuable information about microstructural properties of prostatic tissue. The most common prostate DTI measures are the fractional anisotropy (FA) and median diffusivity (MD) can give more information regarding the biophysical characteristics of prostate tissue. We aimed to explore the correlation of these DTI parameters with GS levels in PCa patients that can affect the management protocol of PCa. Results: The computed area under curve (AUC) of the FA values used to differentiate cancer patients from control group was (0.90) with cutoff point to differentiate both groups were >= 0.245. The computed sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were (84%, 80%, 95.5%, and 50%), respectively, with accuracy 83.3%. FA showed high positive correlation with Gleason score (p value <0.001). Median diffusivity (MD) showed negative correlation with GS with statistically significant results (p value = 0.013). PCa fiber bundles were dense, orderly arranged, without interruption in the low grade, and slightly disorganized in the intermediate group. However, in the high-grade group, the fiber bundles were interrupted, irregularly arranged, and absent at the site of cancerous foci. Conclusions: Combined quantitative parameter values (FA and MD values) and parametric diagrams (FA and DTI maps) can be utilized to evaluate prostate cancer aggressiveness and prognosis, helping in the improvement of the management protocol of PCa patients.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Apparent diffusion coefficient ratio correlates significantly with prostate cancer gleason score at final pathology
    Boesen, Lars
    Chabanova, Elizaveta
    Logager, Vibeke
    Balslev, Ingegerd
    Thomsen, Henrik S.
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2015, 42 (02) : 446 - 453
  • [22] Integrated CT-perfusion shows no meaningful correlation with PSA and presurgical Gleason score in patients with early prostate cancer
    Huellner, Martin W.
    Mattei, Agostino
    Ross, Steffen
    Butea-Bocu, Marius
    Vosbeck, Juerg
    Pauli, Chantal
    Diebold, Joachim
    Seifert, Burkhardt
    Strobel, Klaus
    Veit-Haibach, Patrick
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2014, 38 (06) : 850 - 857
  • [23] Diagnostic accuracy of [-2]proPSA versus Gleason score and Prostate Health Index versus Gleason score for the determination of aggressive prostate cancer: a systematic review
    Anyango, Ruth
    Ojwando, Joel
    Mwita, Clifford
    Mugalo, Edward
    JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2021, 19 (06) : 1263 - 1291
  • [24] Correlation between ADC values and Gleason score in evaluation of prostate cancer: multicentre experience and review of the literature
    Manetta, Rosa
    Palumbo, Pierpaolo
    Gianneramo, Camilla
    Bruno, Federico
    Arrigoni, Francesco
    Natella, Raffaele
    Maggialetti, Nicola
    Agostini, Andrea
    Giovagnoni, Andrea
    Di Cesare, Ernesto
    Splendiani, Alessandra
    Masciocchi, Carlo
    Barile, Antonio
    GLAND SURGERY, 2019, 8 : S216 - S222
  • [25] The utility of ADC parameters in the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer by 3.0-Tesla diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging
    Kus, Aylin Altan
    POLISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2021, 86 : E262 - E268
  • [26] MR spectroscopic imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging of prostate cancer with Gleason scores
    Nagarajan, Rajakumar
    Margolis, Daniel
    Raman, Steven
    Sarma, Manoj K.
    Sheng, Ke
    King, Christopher R.
    Verma, Gaurav
    Sayre, James
    Reiter, Robert E.
    Thomas, M. Albert
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2012, 36 (03) : 697 - 703
  • [27] Diagnostic Utility of Diffusion Tensor Imaging in Differentiating Glioblastomas from Brain Metastases
    Wang, S.
    Kim, S. J.
    Poptani, H.
    Woo, J. H.
    Mohan, S.
    Jin, R.
    Voluck, M. R.
    O'Rourke, D. M.
    Wolf, R. L.
    Melhem, E. R.
    Kim, S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2014, 35 (05) : 928 - 934
  • [28] Correlations between Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and Gleason Score in Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review
    Surov, Alexey
    Meyer, Hans Jonas
    Wienke, Andreas
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2020, 3 (04): : 489 - 497
  • [29] Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of Prostate Cancer: Correlation Between Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values and Tumor Proliferation
    Wang, Xi Zhen
    Wang, Bin
    Gao, Zhi Qin
    Liu, Jin Gang
    Liu, Zuo Qin
    Niu, Qing Liang
    Sun, Zhen Kui
    Yuan, Yu Xiao
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2009, 29 (06) : 1360 - 1366
  • [30] Rotating Frame Relaxation Imaging of Prostate Cancer: Repeatability, Cancer Detection, and Gleason Score Prediction
    Jambor, Ivan
    Pesola, Marko
    Taimen, Pekka
    Merisaari, Harri
    Bostrom, Peter J.
    Minn, Heikki
    Liimatainen, Timo
    Aronen, Hannu J.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2016, 75 (01) : 337 - 344