Diagnostic utility of three Tesla diffusion tensor imaging in prostate cancer: correlation with Gleason score values

被引:0
|
作者
Abouelkheir, Rasha Taha [1 ]
Aboshamia, Yasmin Ibrahim [1 ]
Taman, Saher Ebrahim [2 ]
机构
[1] Mansoura Univ, Urol & Nephrol Ctr, Radiol Dept, Mansoura, Egypt
[2] Mansoura Univ, Fac Med, Radiol Dept, Mansoura, Egypt
关键词
Fractional anisotropy; Mean diffusivity; Prostate cancer; Diffusion tensor imaging; Gleason score; ANTIGEN; BIOPSY; SYSTEM; MRI; AGE;
D O I
10.1186/s43055-022-00892-z
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: Preoperative assessment of prostate cancer (PCa) aggressiveness is a prerequisite to provide specific management options. The Gleason score (GS) obtained from prostatic biopsy or surgery is crucial for the evaluation of PCa aggressiveness and personalized treatment planning. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) provides valuable information about microstructural properties of prostatic tissue. The most common prostate DTI measures are the fractional anisotropy (FA) and median diffusivity (MD) can give more information regarding the biophysical characteristics of prostate tissue. We aimed to explore the correlation of these DTI parameters with GS levels in PCa patients that can affect the management protocol of PCa. Results: The computed area under curve (AUC) of the FA values used to differentiate cancer patients from control group was (0.90) with cutoff point to differentiate both groups were >= 0.245. The computed sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were (84%, 80%, 95.5%, and 50%), respectively, with accuracy 83.3%. FA showed high positive correlation with Gleason score (p value <0.001). Median diffusivity (MD) showed negative correlation with GS with statistically significant results (p value = 0.013). PCa fiber bundles were dense, orderly arranged, without interruption in the low grade, and slightly disorganized in the intermediate group. However, in the high-grade group, the fiber bundles were interrupted, irregularly arranged, and absent at the site of cancerous foci. Conclusions: Combined quantitative parameter values (FA and MD values) and parametric diagrams (FA and DTI maps) can be utilized to evaluate prostate cancer aggressiveness and prognosis, helping in the improvement of the management protocol of PCa patients.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Diagnostic utility of three Tesla diffusion tensor imaging in prostate cancer: correlation with Gleason score values
    Rasha Taha Abouelkheir
    Yasmin Ibrahim Aboshamia
    Saher Ebrahim Taman
    Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, 53
  • [2] Correlation of diffusion tensor imaging parameters and Gleason scores of prostate cancer
    Tian, Weizhong
    Zhang, Ji
    Tian, Fangzheng
    Shen, Junkang
    Niu, Tianli
    He, Guohua
    Yu, Hong
    EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE, 2018, 15 (01) : 351 - 356
  • [3] Correlation of gleason scores with magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging in peripheral zone prostate cancer
    Li, Liang
    Margolis, Daniel J. A.
    Deng, Ming
    Cai, Jie
    Yuan, Ling
    Feng, Zhaoyan
    Min, Xiangde
    Hu, Zhiquan
    Hu, Daoyu
    Liu, Jihong
    Wang, Liang
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2015, 42 (02) : 460 - 467
  • [4] Diffusion tensor imaging of prostate at 3.0 Tesla
    Li, Chunmei
    Chen, Min
    Li, Saying
    Zhao, Xuna
    Zhang, Chen
    Liu, Ming
    Zhou, Cheng
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2011, 52 (07) : 813 - 817
  • [5] Correlation between apparent diffusion coefficient value on diffusion-weighted MR imaging and Gleason score in prostate cancer
    Wu, X.
    Reinikainen, P.
    Vanhanen, A.
    Kapanen, M.
    Vierikko, T.
    Ryymin, P.
    Hyodynmaa, S.
    Kellokumpu-Lehtinen, P. -L.
    DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL IMAGING, 2017, 98 (01) : 63 - 71
  • [6] Comparison Between Gleason Score and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Obtained from Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of Prostate Cancer Patients
    Caivano, Rocchina
    Rabasco, Paola
    Lotumolo, Antonella
    Cirillo, Patrizia
    D'Antuono, Felice
    Zandolino, Alexis
    Villonio, Antonio
    Macarini, Luca
    Salvatore, Marco
    Cammarota, Aldo
    CANCER INVESTIGATION, 2013, 31 (09) : 625 - 629
  • [7] Mathematical Models for Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of Prostate Cancer Using b Values up to 2000 s/mm2 : Correlation with Gleason Score and Repeatability of Region of Interest Analysis
    Toivonen, Jussi
    Merisaari, Harri
    Pesola, Marko
    Taimen, Pekka
    Bostrom, Peter J.
    Pahikkala, Tapio
    Aronen, Hannu J.
    Jambor, Ivan
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2015, 74 (04) : 1116 - 1124
  • [8] Prostate cancer aggressive prediction: preponderant diagnostic performances of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) imaging and diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) beyond ADC at 3.0 T scanner with gleason score at final pathology
    Shan, Yingchan
    Chen, Xiaoshan
    Liu, Kai
    Zeng, Mengsu
    Zhou, Jianjun
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2019, 44 (10) : 3441 - 3452
  • [9] Periprostatic Fat Thickness on MRI: Correlation With Gleason Score in Prostate Cancer
    Woo, Sungmin
    Cho, Jeong Yeon
    Kim, Sang Youn
    Kim, Seung Hyup
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2015, 204 (01) : W43 - W47
  • [10] Diffusion Is Directional: Innovative Diffusion Tensor Imaging to Improve Prostate Cancer Detection
    Shenhar, Chen
    Degani, Hadassa
    Ber, Yaara
    Baniel, Jack
    Tamir, Shlomit
    Benjaminov, Ofer
    Rosen, Philip
    Furman-Haran, Edna
    Margel, David
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2021, 11 (03)