Does quality improvement work? Evaluation of the organ donation breakthrough collaborative

被引:55
作者
Howard, David H.
Siminoff, Laura A.
McBride, Virginia
Lin, Monica
机构
[1] Emory Univ, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, Atlanta, GA 30030 USA
[2] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Sch Med, Dept Social & Behav Hlth, Richmond, VA USA
[3] DHHS HRSA, Div Transplantat, Rockville, MD USA
关键词
organ donation; quality improvement;
D O I
10.1111/j.1475-6773.2007.00732.x
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective. The Organ Donation Breakthrough Collaborative is a quality improvement initiative to encourage adoption of "best practices" for identifying potential donors and obtaining consent for deceased organ donation. We evaluate the impact of the first phase on organ donation rates. Setting. We study donation rates in the 95 hospitals that participated in the first phase and a control group of 125 hospitals. Design. We use a controlled pre/post design. The preperiod is the year before the start of the Collaborative (September 2002 to August 2003), the postperiod is the final 6 months of the first phase (March 2004 to August 2004). Data. We use administrative data from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network to compute the conversion rate in each hospital group and time period. The conversion rate is the proportion of eligible donors who became actual donors. Principal Findings. Preperiod conversion rates in Collaborative and control hospitals were similar: 52 and 51 percent, respectively. In the postperiod, the conversion rate increased to 60 percent among Collaborative hospitals and remained at 51 percent among control hospitals. The relative change was 8 percentage points (95 percent confidence interval: 2-13: p <.001). Conclusions. Our findings suggest that the Breakthrough Collaborative led to an increase in donation rates at participating hospitals.
引用
收藏
页码:2160 / 2173
页数:14
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT AS AN IDEAL IN HEALTH-CARE [J].
BERWICK, DM .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1989, 320 (01) :53-56
[2]   A report card on continuous quality improvement [J].
Blumenthal, D ;
Kilo, CM .
MILBANK QUARTERLY, 1998, 76 (04) :625-+
[3]   Summary: The quality improvement program in organ donation of the Tuscany region [J].
Bozzi, G ;
Matesanz, R ;
Saviozzi, A ;
RossiFerrini, PL .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2004, 36 (03) :424-425
[4]   A qualitative study of increasing β-blocker use after myocardial infarction -: Why do some hospitals succeed? [J].
Bradley, EH ;
Holmboe, ES ;
Mattera, JA ;
Roumanis, SA ;
Radford, MJ ;
Krumholz, HM .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2001, 285 (20) :2604-2611
[5]   From functionalism to cultural studies: Manifest ruptures and latent continuities [J].
Burrowes, CP .
COMMUNICATION THEORY, 1996, 6 (01) :88-103
[6]  
*COMM INCR RAT ORG, 2006, ORG DON OPP ACT
[7]  
HOWARD DH, IN PRESS J EC PERSPE
[8]   From motives to results: Improving the effectiveness of quality improvement [J].
Jha, AK ;
Schneider, EC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2004, 117 (05) :359-361
[9]  
LAFFEL G, 1989, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V262, P2869
[10]  
O'Brien J L, 1995, Qual Manag Health Care, V3, P19