Predictors of suboptimal surgical cytoreduction in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer treated with initial chemotherapy

被引:16
作者
Bland, A. E. [1 ]
Everett, E. N. [1 ]
Pastore, L. M. [1 ]
Andersen, W. A. [1 ]
Taylor, P. T., Jr. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Virginia Hlth Syst, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Gynecol Oncol, Charlottesville, VA USA
关键词
chemotherapy; initial chemotherapy; neoadjuvant chemotherapy; ovarian cancer; suboptimal cytoreduction;
D O I
10.1111/j.1525-1438.2007.01114.x
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The objective of this study was to retrospectively evaluate predictors of suboptimal surgical cytoreduction (SSC) in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) treated with initial chemotherapy (IC). All women with EOC treated with IC at our hospital between January 1, 1995, and January 1, 2003, were eligible; 128 patients met inclusion criteria and underwent retrospective chart review. Eighty-four patients (66%) had an optimal surgical cytoreduction (OSC), 14 patients (11%) had an SSC, and 30 (23%) patients were treated with chemotherapy only (CO). Patients in the SSC group had more small-bowel mesentery disease on preoperative computed tomography (CT) scan compared to the OSC group (38% SSC vs 6% OSC, P = 0.024). Patients in the SSC group were also more likely to have disease on the liver surface, small-bowel surface, large-bowel mesentery, bladder peritoneum, spleen, and diaphragm that was not reported on preoperative CT but found at surgery. More patients in the SSC group had chemoresistant disease (indicated by stable or progressive disease on CT scan [56% SSC vs 17% OSC, P = 0.05]) and less of a decrease in their CA-125 values (69% SSC vs 93% OSC, P <= 0.001) than patients in the OSC group. Many women with advanced EOC do not have OSC even if initially treated with IC. We created novel algorithms to identify patients who would likely have an SSC after IC. For those patients highly likely to have an SSC, CO may be offered as a reasonable alternative, decreasing the morbidity of an extensive surgical procedure that may not provide survival benefit.
引用
收藏
页码:629 / 636
页数:8
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   Diagnostic open laparoscopy in the management of advanced ovarian cancer [J].
Angioli, R ;
Palaia, I ;
Zullo, MA ;
Muzii, L ;
Manci, N ;
Calcagno, M ;
Panici, PB .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2006, 100 (03) :455-461
[2]  
[Anonymous], AM J OBSTET GYNECOLO
[3]  
Bristow RE, 2000, CANCER, V89, P1532, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(20001001)89:7<1532::AID-CNCR17>3.0.CO
[4]  
2-A
[5]   Survival effect of maximal cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian carcinoma during the platinum era: A meta-analysis [J].
Bristow, RE ;
Tomacruz, RS ;
Armstrong, DK ;
Trimble, EL ;
Montz, FJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 20 (05) :1248-1259
[6]   Platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval surgical cytoreduction for advanced ovarian cancer: A meta-analysis [J].
Bristow, Robert E. ;
Chi, Dennis S. .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2006, 103 (03) :1070-1076
[7]   Preoperative predictors of suboptimal primary surgical cytoreduction in women with clinical evidence of advanced primary epithelial ovarian cancer [J].
Brockbank, EC ;
Ind, TEJ ;
Barton, DPJ ;
Shepherd, JH ;
Gore, ME ;
A'Hern, R ;
Bridges, JE .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2004, 14 (01) :42-50
[8]   Improved optimal cytoreduction rates for stages IIIC and IV epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer: a change in surgical approach [J].
Chi, DS ;
Franklin, CC ;
Levine, DA ;
Akselrod, F ;
Sabbatini, P ;
Jarnagin, WR ;
DeMatteo, R ;
Poynor, EA ;
Abu-Rustum, NR ;
Barakat, RR .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2004, 94 (03) :650-654
[9]   The ability of preoperative serum CA-125 to predict optimal primary tumor cytoreduction in stage III epithelial ovarian carcinoma [J].
Chi, DS ;
Venkatraman, ES ;
Masson, V ;
Hoskins, WJ .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2000, 77 (02) :227-231
[10]   Identification of prognostic factors in advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma [J].
Chi, DS ;
Liao, JB ;
Leon, LF ;
Venkatraman, ES ;
Hensley, ML ;
Bhaskaran, D ;
Hoskins, WJ .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2001, 82 (03) :532-537