ERCP in patients with prior Billroth II gastrectomy: report of 30 years' experience

被引:57
作者
Bove, Vincenzo [1 ]
Tringali, Andrea [1 ]
Familiari, Pietro [1 ]
Gigante, Giovanni [1 ]
Boskoski, Ivo [1 ]
Perri, Vincenzo [1 ]
Mutignani, Massimiliano [2 ]
Costamagna, Guido [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Digest Endoscopy Unit, Gemelli Univ Hosp, I-00168 Rome, Italy
[2] Osped Niguarda Ca Granda, Digest Endoscopy Unit, Milan, Italy
关键词
ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; THERAPEUTIC ERCP; PROSPECTIVE MULTICENTER; VIEWING ENDOSCOPE; SPHINCTEROTOMY; COMPLICATIONS;
D O I
10.1055/s-0034-1391567
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and study aim: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is difficult in patients with altered anatomy following Billroth II gastrectomy. Afferent loop intubation, selective cannulation, and sphincterotomy are the main issues. Experience from a tertiary referral endoscopy center is reported. Patients and methods: A total of 713 patients with Billroth II reconstruction who underwent ERCP between October 1982 and October 2012 were retrospectively identified from a prospectively collected database (mean age 69 +/- 27 years; 567 males). The main indications for ERCP were common bile duct stones (51.2 %) and obstructive jaundice (24.8 %). Procedures were always started with a duodenoscope; in cases of failure to reach the papilla the duodenoscope was changed to a gastroscope. Endoscopic sphincterotomy was performed using a long-nose sigmoid inverted sphincterotome. Results: The successful duodenal intubation rate was 86.7% (618/713 patients). The main reason for intubation failure was a long and angulated afferent loop. Successful cannulation/opacification of the desired biliopancreatic duct was 93.8% (580/618). Biliary and/or pancreatic sphincterotomy were performed in 490 (84.5 %) and 23 (4.0 %) patients, respectively. The adverse event rate was 4.3% (45/1050 procedures). Peritoneal perforation occurred in 1.8% of the cases (19/1050 procedures) and always required immediate surgery. Two patients died after surgery (overall mortality 0.3 %). The other adverse events resolved following conservative management or endoscopic reintervention. Conclusions: In experienced centers, ERCP in Billroth II patients had morbidity and mortality rates that were comparable to patients with normal anatomy. The main reasons for failure were related to the inability to reach the papilla. Peritoneal perforation was the most common adverse event, and required a prompt surgical approach.
引用
收藏
页码:612 / 617
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   Endoscopic retrograde cholanglopancreatography in patients with Billroth II gastroenterostorny [J].
Cicek, Bahattin ;
Parlak, Erkan ;
Disibeyaz, Selcuk ;
Koksal, Aydin Seref ;
Sahin, Burhan .
JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2007, 22 (08) :1210-1213
[2]   Complications of diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP [J].
Cohen, SA ;
Siegel, JH ;
Kasmin, FE .
ABDOMINAL IMAGING, 1996, 21 (05) :385-394
[3]   Quality indicators, including complications, of ERCP in a community setting: a prospective study [J].
Colton, Joshua B. ;
Curran, Colleen C. .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2009, 70 (03) :457-467
[4]  
COSTAMAGNA G, 1994, ACTA GASTRO-ENT BELG, V57, P155
[5]  
Costamagna G, 2016, ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRAD
[6]  
Demarquay JF, 1998, ITAL J GASTROENTEROL, V30, P297
[7]  
Faylona JMV, 1999, ENDOSCOPY, V31, P546
[8]   Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy [J].
Freeman, ML ;
Nelson, DB ;
Sherman, S ;
Haber, GB ;
Herman, ME ;
Dorsher, PJ ;
Moore, JP ;
Fennerty, MB ;
Ryan, ME ;
Shaw, MJ ;
Lande, JD ;
Pheley, AM .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 335 (13) :909-918
[9]   Endoscopic sphincterotomy using an S-shaped sphincterotome in patients with a Billroth II or Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy [J].
Hintze, RE ;
Veltzke, W ;
Adler, A ;
AbouRebyeh, H .
ENDOSCOPY, 1997, 29 (02) :74-78
[10]   Classification and management of perforations complicating endoscopic sphincterotomy [J].
Howard, TJ ;
Tan, T ;
Lehman, GA ;
Sherman, S ;
Madura, JA ;
Fogel, E ;
Swack, ML ;
Kopecky, KK .
SURGERY, 1999, 126 (04) :658-663