FUZZY GAIN SCHEDULING: COMPARISON OF THE CONTROL STRATEGY

被引：0

作者：

Sajona, Jefferson ^{[1
]}

Velilla, Wilmer ^{[2
]}

Fabregas, Jonathan ^{[1
]}

Palencia, Argemiro ^{[3
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Autonoma Caribe, Engn Fac, Cl 90 46-112, Barranquilla, Atlantico, Colombia

[2] Univ Austral Chile, Engn Fac, Independencia 631, Valdivia, Los Rios, Chile

[3] Univ Tecnol Bolivar, Engn Fac, Km 1 Via Turbaco, Cartagena, Bolivar, Colombia

来源：

JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY | 2022年 / 17卷 / 02期

关键词：

Dynamic matrix control; Fuzzy logic control; Model predictive control; Process control; Stirred tank-reactor; PID CONTROLLER; SYSTEM; DESIGN; LEVEL;

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

T [工业技术];

学科分类号：

08 ;

摘要：

The use of better control strategies has a great interest in all kinds of industries in recent years since it allows better use of resources and therefore becomes an important factor in reducing costs associated with reprocessing and unnecessary spending of raw materials. This research evaluates the performance of a control strategy, in which the tuning parameters of a classic controller are supplied by a fuzzy logic algorithm (Fuzzy Gain Scheduling). the behaviour of the strategy is tested in a mixer-reactor system and is compared with that achieved through the implementation of a classic controller, a dynamic matrix system, and fuzzy logic control. In the results, it can be seen that the Fuzzy Gain Scheduling strategy presents a good behaviour, improving around 25% compared with the other alternatives, this added to the advantage of being able to include previous experience on the process, in the actions that are taken by the strategy to keep desired operating ranges.

引用

页码：1356 / 1368

页数：13

共 41 条

[1] Fuzzy temperature control of industrial refineries furnaces through combined feedforward/feedback multivariable cascade systems [J].

Abilov, AG ;

Zeybek, Z ;

Tuzunalp, O ;

Telatar, Z .

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING AND PROCESSING-PROCESS INTENSIFICATION, 2002, 41 (01) :87-98

[2]

Adnan R., 2011, 2011 Proceedings of IEEE 7th International Colloquium on Signal Processing & its Applications (CSPA 2011), P395, DOI 10.1109/CSPA.2011.5759909

[3] Gain Scheduling Dual Mode MPC for a Solar Thermal Power Plant [J].

Alsharkawi, A. ;

Rossiter, J. A. .

IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2016, 49 (18) :128-133

[4] Adaptive Fuzzy Gain Scheduling of PI Controller for control of the Wind Energy Conversion Systems [J].

Bedoud, K. ;

Ali-Rachedi, M. ;

Bahi, T. ;

Lakel, R. .

INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TECHNOLOGIES AND MATERIALS FOR RENEWABLE ENERGY, ENVIRONMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY -TMREES15, 2015, 74 :211-225

[5]

Bharathi G, 2021, INT J AMBIENT ENERGY, DOI [10.4018/IJNCR.2021070103, 10.1080/01430750.2021.1874526]

[6]

Bingi K, 2017, IEEE I C SIGNAL IMAG, P289, DOI 10.1109/ICSIPA.2017.8120623

[7] A fuzzy gain scheduling PI controller application for an interconnected electrical power system [J].

Çam, E ;

Kocaarslan, I .

ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2005, 73 (03) :267-274

[8] Variable structure fuzzy gain scheduling based load frequency controller for multi source multi area hydro thermal system [J].

Chandrakala, K. R. M. Vijaya ;

Balamurugan, S. ;

Sankaranarayanan, K. .

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL POWER & ENERGY SYSTEMS, 2013, 53 :375-381

[9] Fuzzy self-adaptive PID control technique for driving HHO dry cell systems [J].

Conker, Caglar ;

Baltacioglu, Mustafa Kaan .

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2020, 45 (49) :26059-26069

[10]

De La Cruz H.S., 2013, ENFOQUES ANALISIS SI, V1st

← 1 2 3 4 5 →