Assessing the digital library research output: bibliometric analysis from 2002 to 2016

被引:22
作者
Ahmad, Khurshid [1 ]
Ming, Zheng Jian [1 ]
Rafi, Muhammad [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ, Sch Informat Management, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
关键词
Digital libraries; ISI Web of Science; Bibliometric analysis; Information science; Library science; INFORMATION-SCIENCE; PATTERNS;
D O I
10.1108/EL-02-2017-0036
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
Purpose The purpose of this bibliometric analysis is to quantify the prominence and impact of published literature within the field. The research has been conducted with the intent of obtaining the expansion and characteristics of the literature on digital library. Design/methodology/approach More than 4,206 documents found in the period of 2002-2016 were collected from the ISI Web of Science and were analyzed to explore the annual productivity, yearly citation, most cited articles, prolific authors, eminent journals of the subject, productivity of institutes and contribution of countries. These results are based on the types of documents (articles, reviews, proceedings papers, book reviews, editorial materials and book chapters). Findings The core findings are that the most productive year of publication was 2016, and the growth of citation increased rapidly; the top source of title is electronic library. The result shows that the USA dominates in the research output, with Illinois University securing the first position; the most prolific author is Fourie I from South Africa. In the document types category, the most cited sources are research articles. Originality/value This research is useful for the researchers interested in the field of bibliometrics as it postulates an inclusive indication of provenance in the field of library and information science.
引用
收藏
页码:696 / 704
页数:9
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Anyi KWU, 2009, MALAYS J LIBR INF SC, V14, P17
  • [2] Economics in Latin America: a bibliometric analysis
    Bonilla, Claudio A.
    Merigo, Jose M.
    Torres-Abad, Carolina
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 2015, 105 (02) : 1239 - 1252
  • [3] The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact?
    Ellegaard, Ole
    Wallin, Johan A.
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 2015, 105 (03) : 1809 - 1831
  • [4] Climate Change Research in View of Bibliometrics
    Haunschild, Robin
    Bornmann, Lutz
    Marx, Werner
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (07):
  • [5] A Bibliometric Study of Highly Cited Reviews in the Science Citation Index Expanded™
    Ho, Yuh-Shan
    Kahn, Michael
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 65 (02) : 372 - 385
  • [6] Ivanovi D., 2014, J LIBR INF SCI, V48, P36
  • [7] A Study to Analyze Collaboration Patterns for Asian Library and Information Science (LIS) Scholars on Author, Institutional and Country Levels
    Jabeen, Munazza
    Yun, Liu
    Wang, Xuefeng
    Rafiq, Muhammad
    Mazher, Abeer
    Tahir, Muhammad Azam
    Jabeen, Misbah
    [J]. SERIALS REVIEW, 2016, 42 (01) : 18 - 30
  • [8] Bibliometric Study of Scholarly Writing and Publishing Patterns Concerning Copyright and Digital Images
    Kennedy, Corinne Rebecca
    [J]. ART DOCUMENTATION, 2015, 34 (01): : 60 - 70
  • [9] The 100 most-cited articles in neuroimaging: A bibliometric analysis
    Kim, Hye Jeong
    Yoon, Dae Young
    Kim, Eun Soo
    Lee, Kwanseop
    Bae, Jong Seok
    Lee, Ju-Hun
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 2016, 139 : 149 - 156
  • [10] A Review of the Use of Complementary and Alternative Medicine and HIV: Issues for Patient Care
    Lorenc, Ava
    Robinson, Nicola
    [J]. AIDS PATIENT CARE AND STDS, 2013, 27 (09) : 503 - 510