Lexical competition in non-native spoken-word recognition

被引:317
|
作者
Weber, A [1 ]
Cutler, A
机构
[1] Univ Saarland, D-6600 Saarbrucken, Germany
[2] Max Planck Inst Psycholinguist, Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
spoken-word recognition; non-native listening; lexical competition; phonetic contrast;
D O I
10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00105-0
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
Four eye-tracking experiments examined lexical competition in non-native spoken-word recognition. Dutch listeners hearing English fixated longer on distractor pictures with names containing vowels that Dutch listeners are likely to confuse with vowels in a target picture name (pencil, given target panda) than on less confusable distractors (beetle, given target bottle). English listeners showed no such viewing time difference. The confusability was asymmetric: given pencil as target, panda did not distract more than distinct competitors. Distractors with Dutch names phonologically related to English target names (deksel, 'lid,' given target desk) also received longer fixations than distractors with phonologically unrelated names. Again, English listeners showed no differential effect. With the materials translated into Dutch, Dutch listeners showed no activation of the English words (desk, given target deksel). The results motivate two conclusions: native phonemic categories capture second-language input even when stored representations maintain a second-language distinction; and lexical competition is greater for non-native than for native listeners. (C) 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 25
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Italians use abstract knowledge about lexical stress during spoken-word recognition
    Sulpizio, Simone
    McQueen, James M.
    JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2012, 66 (01) : 177 - 193
  • [22] A phonetic model of non-native spoken word processing
    Matusevych, Yevgen
    Kamper, Herman
    Schatz, Thomas
    Feldman, Naomi H.
    Goldwater, Sharon
    16TH CONFERENCE OF THE EUROPEAN CHAPTER OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS (EACL 2021), 2021, : 1480 - 1490
  • [23] An investigation of phonology and orthography in spoken-word recognition
    Slowiaczek, LM
    Soltano, EG
    Wieting, SJ
    Bishop, KL
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY SECTION A-HUMAN EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 56 (02): : 233 - 262
  • [24] THE EFFECT OF THE UNIQUENESS POINT IN SPOKEN-WORD RECOGNITION
    RADEAU, M
    MOUSTY, P
    BERTELSON, P
    PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH-PSYCHOLOGISCHE FORSCHUNG, 1989, 51 (03): : 123 - 128
  • [25] Influence of onset density on spoken-word recognition
    Vitevitch, MS
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2002, 28 (02) : 270 - 278
  • [26] Spoken-word recognition: The access to embedded words
    Isel, F
    Bacri, N
    BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 1999, 68 (1-2) : 61 - 67
  • [27] Pitch accent in spoken-word recognition in Japanese
    Cutler, A
    Otake, T
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1999, 105 (03): : 1877 - 1888
  • [28] Linguistic gender and spoken-word recognition in French
    Dahan, D
    Swingley, D
    Tanenhaus, MK
    Magnuson, JS
    JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2000, 42 (04) : 465 - 480
  • [29] Lexical and talker effects on word recognition among native and non-native listeners with normal and impaired hearing
    Takayanagi, S
    Dirks, DD
    Moshfegh, A
    JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2002, 45 (03): : 585 - 597
  • [30] Neural substrates of subphonemic variation and lexical competition in spoken word recognition
    Luthra, Sahil
    Guediche, Sara
    Blumstein, Sheila E.
    Myers, Emily B.
    LANGUAGE COGNITION AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2019, 34 (02) : 151 - 169