Electronic correlation in nanoscale junctions: Comparison of the GW approximation to a numerically exact solution of the single-impurity Anderson model

被引:54
作者
Wang, X. [1 ]
Spataru, C. D. [2 ]
Hybertsen, M. S. [3 ]
Millis, A. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Dept Phys, New York, NY 10027 USA
[2] Columbia Univ, Ctr Electron Transport Mol Nanostruct, New York, NY 10027 USA
[3] Brookhaven Natl Lab, Ctr Funct Nanomat, Upton, NY 11973 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevB.77.045119
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The impact of electronic correlation in nanoscale junctions, e.g., formed by single molecules, is analyzed using the single-impurity Anderson model. Numerically exact quantum Monte Carlo calculations are performed to map out the orbital filling, linear response conductance, and spectral function as a function of the Coulomb interaction strength and the impurity level position. These numerical results form a benchmark against which approximate but more broadly applicable approaches to include electronic correlation in transport can be compared. As an example, the self-consistent GW approximation has been implemented for the Anderson model and the results have been compared to this benchmark. For weak coupling or for level positions such that the impurity is either nearly empty or nearly full, the GW approximation is found to be accurate. However, for intermediate or strong coupling, the GW approximation does not properly represent the impact of spin or charge fluctuations. Neither the spectral function nor the linear response conductance is accurately given across the Coulomb blockade plateau and well into the mixed valence regimes.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]   LOCALIZED MAGNETIC STATES IN METALS [J].
ANDERSON, PW .
PHYSICAL REVIEW, 1961, 124 (01) :41-&
[2]   The GW method [J].
Aryasetiawan, F ;
Gunnarsson, O .
REPORTS ON PROGRESS IN PHYSICS, 1998, 61 (03) :237-312
[3]  
AULBUR WG, 2000, SOLID STATE PHYS, P2
[4]   Interface geometry and molecular junction conductance: Geometric fluctuation and stochastic switching [J].
Basch, H ;
Cohen, R ;
Ratner, MA .
NANO LETTERS, 2005, 5 (09) :1668-1675
[5]   CONSERVATION LAWS AND CORRELATION FUNCTIONS [J].
BAYM, G ;
KADANOFF, LP .
PHYSICAL REVIEW, 1961, 124 (02) :287-+
[6]   SELF-CONSISTENT APPROXIMATIONS IN MANY-BODY SYSTEMS [J].
BAYM, G .
PHYSICAL REVIEW, 1962, 127 (04) :1391-&
[7]   Quasiparticle properties of a simple metal at high electron temperatures [J].
Benedict, LX ;
Spataru, CD ;
Louie, SG .
PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 2002, 66 (08) :851161-851169
[8]   CONSERVING APPROXIMATIONS FOR STRONGLY FLUCTUATING ELECTRON-SYSTEMS .1. FORMALISM AND CALCULATIONAL APPROACH [J].
BICKERS, NE ;
SCALAPINO, DJ .
ANNALS OF PHYSICS, 1989, 193 (01) :206-251
[9]  
COLEMAN P, ARXIVCONDMAT0206003
[10]   Ab initio GW electron-electron interaction effects in quantum transport [J].
Darancet, Pierre ;
Ferretti, Andrea ;
Mayou, Didier ;
Olevano, Valerio .
PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 2007, 75 (07)