Information strategy in a supply chain under asymmetric customer returns information

被引:15
作者
Zhang, Qiao [1 ]
Chen, Jing [2 ]
Chen, Bintong [3 ]
机构
[1] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Management, Xian 710049, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[2] Dalhousie Univ, Rowe Sch Business, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada
[3] Univ Delaware, Lerner Coll Business & Econ, Newark, DE 19716 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会; 中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
Supply chain management; Customer returns; Asymmetric information; Buyback; Channel encroachment; Information strategy; MONEY-BACK GUARANTEES; ORDER QUANTITIES; CONSUMER RETURNS; PRODUCT RETURNS; CHANNEL; REFUND; IMPACT; POLICIES; QUALITY; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.tre.2021.102511
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Y We develop a model for a supply chain with a manufacturer and a retailer facing customer returns, in which information about the rate of customer returns is obtained and held asymmetrically. The retailer implements a full refund policy and accepts returns, collecting and retaining data on the rate of returns. The manufacturer is uninformed about the returns rate. The manufacturer has four strategies as to returns rate information: not acquiring the information, acquiring the information through a side payment contract, offering a buyback policy in order to participate in the returns process, or encroaching with a direct channel. We identify the manufacturer's optimal information strategy and discuss the retailer's preferences. We also identify win-win outcomes for the manufacturer and the retailer. We find that a buyback policy helps the manufacturer to obtain returns rate information for free when the salvage value is the same for the manufacturer and the retailer. When the manufacturer's salvage value is relatively low, there always exists a region where the manufacturer does not try to acquire the information. The retailer may benefit from the cases in which the manufacturer does not acquire the information, adopts a side payment contract, or institutes a buyback policy, but the retailer is always worse off from the manufacturer's channel encroachment strategy. Both the manufacturer and the retailer may have consistent preferences as to the manufacturer's strategy.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]   Taking stock of consumer returns: A review and classification of the literature [J].
Abdulla, Huseyn ;
Ketzenberg, Michael ;
Abbey, James D. .
JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2019, 65 (06) :560-605
[2]  
Ader J., 2021, Returning to order: Improving returns management for apparel companies
[3]   The Option Value of Returns: Theory and Empirical Evidence [J].
Anderson, Eric T. ;
Hansen, Karsten ;
Simester, Duncan .
MARKETING SCIENCE, 2009, 28 (03) :405-423
[4]   The bright side of supplier encroachment [J].
Arya, Anil ;
Mittendorf, Brian ;
Sappington, David E. M. .
MARKETING SCIENCE, 2007, 26 (05) :651-659
[5]   A game theoretic approach for pricing under a return policy and a money back guarantee in a closed loop supply chain [J].
Assarzadegan, Parisa ;
Rasti-Barzoki, Morteza .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2020, 222
[6]  
Bandi C., 2018, HARVARD BUSINESS SCH, P19
[7]  
Bieniek M., 2021, INFOR INFORM SYST OP, V59, P169
[8]   Compete in Price or Service?-A Study of Personalized Pricing and Money Back Guarantees [J].
Chen, Bintong ;
Chen, Jing .
JOURNAL OF RETAILING, 2017, 93 (02) :154-171
[9]   When to introduce an online channel, and offer money back guarantees and personalized pricing? [J].
Chen, Bintong ;
Chen, Jing .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2017, 257 (02) :614-624
[10]   Implementing market segmentation using full-refund and no-refund customer returns policies in a dual-channel supply chain structure [J].
Chen, Jing ;
Bell, Peter C. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2012, 136 (01) :56-66