Experiences of the gender climate in clinical training - a focus group study among Swedish medical students

被引:34
作者
Kristoffersson, Emelie [1 ,2 ]
Andersson, Jenny [1 ]
Bengs, Carita [3 ]
Hamberg, Katarina [1 ]
机构
[1] Umea Univ, Dept Publ Hlth & Clin Med, Family Med, S-90187 Umea, Sweden
[2] Umea Univ, Umea Ctr Gender Studies, S-90187 Umea, Sweden
[3] Umea Univ, Dept Sociol, S-90187 Umea, Sweden
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
Medical education; Clinical training; Gender equality; Attitudes; Sexism; Focus groups; SEXUAL-HARASSMENT; EDUCATION; DISCRIMINATION; PERSPECTIVE; CURRICULUM; DOCTORS; AWARENESS; ISSUES;
D O I
10.1186/s12909-016-0803-1
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Background: Research shows that medical education is characterized by unequal conditions for women and men, but there is a lack of qualitative studies investigating the social processes that enable and maintain gender inequalities that include both male and female students. In this focus group study, we therefore explored male as well as female medical students' experiences of the gender climate - i.e., how beliefs, values, and norms about gender were communicated - during clinical training and how the students dealt with these experiences. Methods: Focus group interviews were conducted with 24 medical students (nine men) at Umea University, Sweden. The interviews were structured around personal experiences in clinical training where the participants perceived that gender had mattered. Data were analysed using qualitative content analysis. Results: The students described gender-stereotyped expectations, discriminatory treatment, compliments, comments, and demeaning jargon. Female students gave more personal and varied examples than the men. The students' ways of handling their experiences were marked by efforts to fit in, for example, by adapting their appearance and partaking in the prevailing jargon. They felt dependent on supervisors and staff, and due to fear of repercussions they kept silent and avoided unpleasant situations and people rather than challenging humiliating jargon or supervisors who were behaving badly. Conclusions: Everyday communication of gender beliefs combined with students' adaptation to stereotyped expectations and discrimination came across as fundamental features through which unequal conditions for male and female students are reproduced and maintained in the clinic. Because they are in a dependent position, it is often difficult for students to challenge problematic gender attitudes. The main responsibility for improvements, therefore, lies with medical school leadership who need to provide students and supervisors with knowledge about gendered processes, discrimination, and sexism and to organize reflection groups about the gender climate in order to improve students' opportunities to discuss their experiences, and hopefully find ways to protest and actively demand change.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 11
页数:11
相关论文
共 36 条
[11]   Learning about gender on campus: an analysis of the hidden curriculum for medical students [J].
Cheng, Ling-Fang ;
Yang, Hsing-Chen .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2015, 49 (03) :321-331
[12]   Hegemonic masculinity - Rethinking the concept [J].
Connell, RW ;
Messerschmidt, JW .
GENDER & SOCIETY, 2005, 19 (06) :829-859
[13]   The body and doing gender: the relations between doctors and nurses in hospital work [J].
Davies, K .
SOCIOLOGY OF HEALTH & ILLNESS, 2003, 25 (07) :720-742
[14]   Is Gender Inequality Greater at Lower or Higher Educational Levels? Common Patterns in the Netherlands, Sweden, and the United States [J].
Evertsson, Marie ;
England, Paula ;
Mooi-Reci, Irma ;
Hermsen, Joan ;
de Bruijn, Jeanne ;
Cotter, David .
SOCIAL POLITICS, 2009, 16 (02) :210-241
[15]   Harassment and Discrimination in Medical Training: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [J].
Fnais, Naif ;
Soobiah, Charlene ;
Chen, Maggie Hong ;
Lillie, Erin ;
Perrier, Laure ;
Tashkhandi, Mariam ;
Straus, Sharon E. ;
Mamdani, Muhammad ;
Al-Omran, Mohammed ;
Tricco, Andrea C. .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2014, 89 (05) :817-827
[16]   An ambivalent alliance - Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality [J].
Glick, P ;
Fiske, ST .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2001, 56 (02) :109-118
[17]   Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness [J].
Graneheim, UH ;
Lundman, B .
NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2004, 24 (02) :105-112
[18]   Beyond curriculum reform: Confronting medicine's hidden curriculum [J].
Hafferty, FW .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 1998, 73 (04) :403-407
[19]   SCIENTIFIC RIGOUR IN QUALITATIVE RESEARCH - EXAMPLES FROM A STUDY OF WOMENS HEALTH IN FAMILY-PRACTICE [J].
HAMBERG, K ;
JOHANSSON, E ;
LINDGREN, G ;
WESTMAN, G .
FAMILY PRACTICE, 1994, 11 (02) :176-181
[20]  
Hamberg Katarina, 2003, Lakartidningen, V100, P4078