Characterization of radiographers' mammography practice in five European countries: a pilot study

被引:11
作者
Meystre, Nicole Richli [1 ]
Henner, Anja [2 ]
dos Reis, Claudia Sa [3 ]
Strom, Bergliot [4 ]
Jorge, Jose A. Pires [1 ]
Kukkes, Tiina [5 ]
Metsala, Eija [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Appl Sci & Arts Lausanne, Sch Hlth Sci, Lausanne, Switzerland
[2] Oulu Univ Appl Sci, Oulu, Finland
[3] Curtin Univ, Lisbon Sch Hlth Technol, Med Radiat Sci, Perth, WA, Australia
[4] Western Norway Univ Appl Sci, Bergen, Norway
[5] Tartu Hlth Care Coll, Tartu, Estonia
[6] Helsinki Metropolia Univ Appl Sci, Helsinki, Finland
关键词
Mammography; Radiographer; Quality control; Professional practice; Challenges; SCREENING PERFORMANCE INDICATORS; FIELD DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; CLINICAL IMAGE QUALITY; COMPRESSION FORCE; BREAST COMPRESSION; FILM; OPTIMIZATION; EXPLORATION; CHALLENGES; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1186/s13244-019-0711-0
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
ObjectivesThis pilot study aimed to characterize and compare radiographers' mammography practice, including quality control and continuous professional development in five European countries.MethodsOnline survey was performed to collect data regarding participants' profile, institution's profile, mammography practice, quality control and continuous professional development. The questionnaire was sent to clinical radiographers working in Estonia, Finland, Norway, Portugal and Switzerland. Descriptive statistical and subgroup analyzes were performed.ResultsThe amount of returned questionnaires was 140. Most respondents were female (92%), having radiography bachelor. The majority (89%) of radiographers was working with full-field digital mammography. The majority (97%) of mammography images were acquired using AEC, and half of the radiographers were using dose saving programmes suggested by the manufacturers. The most typical (50%) compression force ranged from 8 to 11kg. Part of the radiographers (44%) did not know if their practice followed specific guidelines. The most challenging tasks in mammography identified by radiographers were patient positioning (86%), coping with pain (88%), managing anxiety (83%) and imaging breast implants (71%). The majority (88%) of the respondents undertook continuous professional development activities.ConclusionsThe mammography practice varies across the five countries. We found country-specific traits related to mammography image acquisition, patient-centered care and quality management procedures. The lack of evidence-based knowledge suggests the importance of well-designed studies on these topics. The variability found in this pilot study encourages radiographers to question their own practice and teachers to review and revise the training programmes. Validation in larger studies including more countries is needed.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 56 条
  • [1] AGENCY IAE, 2011, IAEA HUM HLTH SER
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2013, ACR PRACTICE PARAMET
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2008, EXPLAINING MED PRACT
  • [4] Reasons for failure of a mammography unit at clinical image review in the American College of Radiology Mammography Accreditation Program
    Bassett, LW
    Farria, DM
    Bansal, S
    Farquhar, MA
    Wilcox, PA
    Feig, SA
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2000, 215 (03) : 698 - 702
  • [5] Technical and clinical breast cancer screening performance indicators for computed radiography versus direct digital radiography
    Bosmans, Hilde
    De Hauwere, An
    Lemmens, Kim
    Zanca, Federica
    Thierens, Hubert
    Van Ongeval, Chantal
    Van Herck, Koen
    Van Steen, Andre
    Martens, Patrick
    Bleyen, Luc
    Vande Putte, Gretel
    Kellen, Eliane
    Mortier, Griet
    Van Limbergen, Erik
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2013, 23 (10) : 2891 - 2898
  • [6] Comparing the use and interpretation of PGMI scoring to assess the technical quality of screening mammograms in the UK and Norway
    Boyce, M.
    Gullien, R.
    Parashar, D.
    Taylor, K.
    [J]. RADIOGRAPHY, 2015, 21 (04) : 342 - 347
  • [7] Mammographic compression - A need for mechanical standardization
    Branderhorst, Woutjan
    de Groot, Jerry E.
    Highnam, Ralph
    Chan, Ariane
    Boehm-Velez, Marcela
    Broeders, Mireille J. M.
    den Heeten, Gerard J.
    Grimbergen, Cornelis A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2015, 84 (04) : 596 - 602
  • [8] Impact of the Introduction of Digital Mammography in an Organized Screening Program on the Recall and Detection Rate
    Campari, Cinzia
    Rossi, Paolo Giorgi
    Mori, Carlo Alberto
    Ravaioli, Sara
    Nitrosi, Andrea
    Vacondio, Rita
    Mancuso, Pamela
    Cattani, Antonella
    Pattacini, Pierpaolo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING, 2016, 29 (02) : 235 - 242
  • [9] Carnett W G, 1999, Qual Manag Health Care, V8, P13
  • [10] Castle A., 1997, Radiography, V3, P253