3D radiotherapy dose prediction on head and neck cancer patients with a hierarchically densely connected U-net deep learning architecture

被引:272
作者
Dan Nguyen [1 ]
Jia, Xun [1 ]
Sher, David [1 ]
Lin, Mu-Han [1 ]
Iqbal, Zohaib [1 ]
Liu, Hui [1 ]
Jiang, Steve [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Southwestern Med Ctr Dallas, Dept Radiat Oncol, Med Artificial Intelligence & Automat Lab, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
关键词
radiation therapy; deep learning; artificial intelligence; dose prediction; head and neck cancer; U-net; DenseNet; INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY; KNOWLEDGE-BASED PREDICTION; SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMAS; RADIATION-THERAPY IMRT; CONFORMAL RADIOTHERAPY; ARC THERAPY; TREATMENT TIME; LOCAL-CONTROL; PLAN QUALITY; AT-RISK;
D O I
10.1088/1361-6560/ab039b
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The treatment planning process for patients with head and neck (H&N) cancer is regarded as one of the most complicated due to large target volume, multiple prescription dose levels, and many radiation-sensitive critical structures near the target. Treatment planning for this site requires a high level of human expertise and a tremendous amount of effort to produce personalized high quality plans, taking as long as a week, which deteriorates the chances of tumor control and patient survival. To solve this problem, we propose to investigate a deep learning-based dose prediction model, Hierarchically Densely Connected U-net, based on two highly popular network architectures: U-net and DenseNet. We find that this new architecture is able to accurately and efficiently predict the dose distribution, outperforming the other two models, the Standard U-net and DenseNet, in homogeneity, dose conformity, and dose coverage on the test data. Averaging across all organs at risk, our proposed model is capable of predicting the organ-at-risk max dose within 6.3% and mean dose within 5.1% of the prescription dose on the test data. The other models, the Standard U-net and DenseNet, performed worse, having an averaged organ-at-risk max dose prediction error of 8.2% and 9.3%, respectively, and averaged mean dose prediction error of 6.4% and 6.8%, respectively. In addition, our proposed model used 12 times less trainable parameters than the Standard U-net, and predicted the patient dose 4 times faster than DenseNet.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]   Predicting dose-volume histograms for organs-at-risk in IMRT planning [J].
Appenzoller, Lindsey M. ;
Michalski, Jeff M. ;
Thorstad, Wade L. ;
Mutic, Sasa ;
Moore, Kevin L. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (12) :7446-7461
[2]   Effects of prolongation of overall treatment time due to unplanned interruptions during radiotherapy of different tumor sites and practical methods for compensation [J].
Bese, Nuran Senel ;
Hendry, Jolyon ;
Jeremic, Branislav .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2007, 68 (03) :654-661
[3]   METHODS OF IMAGE-RECONSTRUCTION FROM PROJECTIONS APPLIED TO CONFORMATION RADIOTHERAPY [J].
BORTFELD, T ;
BURKELBACH, J ;
BOESECKE, R ;
SCHLEGEL, W .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1990, 35 (10) :1423-1434
[4]   X-RAY FIELD COMPENSATION WITH MULTILEAF COLLIMATORS [J].
BORTFELD, TR ;
KAHLER, DL ;
WALDRON, TJ ;
BOYER, AL .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1994, 28 (03) :723-730
[5]   OPTIMIZATION OF STATIONARY AND MOVING BEAM RADIATION-THERAPY TECHNIQUES [J].
BRAHME, A .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1988, 12 (02) :129-140
[6]   Random forests [J].
Breiman, L .
MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) :5-32
[7]  
Buja A, 2006, STAT SINICA, V16, P323
[8]   A generalized inverse planning tool for volumetric-modulated arc therapy [J].
Cao, Daliang ;
Afghan, Muhammad K. N. ;
Ye, Jinsong ;
Chen, Fan ;
Shepard, David M. .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2009, 54 (21) :6725-6738
[9]  
Caruana R, 2001, ADV NEUR IN, V13, P402
[10]   THE GENERATION OF INTENSITY-MODULATED FIELDS FOR CONFORMAL RADIOTHERAPY BY DYNAMIC COLLIMATION [J].
CONVERY, DJ ;
ROSENBLOOM, ME .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1992, 37 (06) :1359-1374