MRI phase contrast velocity and flow errors in turbulent stenotic jets

被引:101
作者
O'Brien, Kieran R. [1 ]
Cowan, Brett R. [2 ]
Jain, Manali [2 ]
Stewart, Ralph A. H. [3 ]
Kerr, Andrew J. [4 ]
Young, Alistair A. [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Auckland, KRO Bioengn Inst, Fac Engn, Auckland 1142, New Zealand
[2] Univ Auckland, Ctr Adv MRI, Auckland 1, New Zealand
[3] Auckland City Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Auckland, New Zealand
[4] Middlemore Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Auckland 6, New Zealand
[5] Univ Auckland, Dept Anat Radiol, Auckland 1, New Zealand
关键词
aortic stenosis; phase contrast; turbulence; jet; errors;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.21395
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To clarify the use of MRI phase contrast (PC), as an alternative to Doppler echocardiography, when measuring high-velocity turbulent jets associated with stenotic valvular disease. Materials and Methods: In vivo PC aortic stroke volume (SV) was compared with ventricular SV in 31 patients with moderate to severe aortic stenosis (AS). Two in vitro pipe experiments were conducted to evaluate errors in steady stenotic and nonstenotic turbulent flows. Results: The average in vivo error in SV was -24% in the left-ventricular (LV) outflow tract (LVOT) and -41% in the aortic root. Errors were most prominent in patients with the highest Doppler peak velocities. In vitro nonstenotic flow experiments showed accurate flow measurement with an average error of 1.8%. Significant errors were found in the in vitro stenotic flow, which reduced with shorter echo times (TE): average error -166/-67/-25/-13/-8.8% for TEs of 4.8/4.0/3.3/2.2/2.0 msec. In both the in vivo and in vitro stenotic experiments the errors were associated with signal loss in the flow-compensated magnitude image. Conclusion: Signal loss is associated with flow errors in stenotic jets. Current clinically available PC pulse sequences with TE > 2 msec may not accurately quantify flow for severe lesions.
引用
收藏
页码:210 / 218
页数:9
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Determination of peak velocity in Stenotic areas: Echocardiography versus k-t SENSE accelerated MR Fourier velocity encoding [J].
Baltes, Christof ;
Hansen, Michael S. ;
Tsao, Jeffrey ;
Kozerke, Sebastian ;
Rezavi, Reza ;
Pedersen, Erik M. ;
Boesiger, Peter .
RADIOLOGY, 2008, 246 (01) :249-257
[2]  
Bernstein MA, 2004, HDB MRI PULSE SEQUEN, P616
[3]   Practical value of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for clinical quantification of aortic valve stenosis comparison with echocardiography [J].
Caruthers, SD ;
Lin, SJ ;
Brown, P ;
Watkins, MP ;
Williams, TA ;
Lehr, KA ;
Wickline, SA .
CIRCULATION, 2003, 108 (18) :2236-2243
[4]   AORTIC-VALVE PRESSURE-GRADIENTS IN PATIENTS WITH AORTIC-VALVE STENOSIS - QUANTIFICATION WITH VELOCITY-ENCODED CINE MR IMAGING [J].
EICHENBERGER, AC ;
JENNI, R ;
VONSCHULTHESS, GK .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1993, 160 (05) :971-977
[5]   Quantification of valvular aortic stenosis by magnetic resonance imaging [J].
Friedrich, MG ;
Schulz-Menger, J ;
Poetsch, T ;
Pilz, B ;
Uhlich, F ;
Dietz, R .
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2002, 144 (02) :329-334
[6]   Spatial structure of the flow through an axisymmetric sudden expansion [J].
Furuichi, N ;
Takeda, Y ;
Kumada, M .
EXPERIMENTS IN FLUIDS, 2003, 34 (05) :643-650
[7]   TURBULENT-FLOW EFFECTS ON NMR IMAGING - MEASUREMENT OF TURBULENT INTENSITY [J].
GAO, JH ;
GORE, JC .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1991, 18 (05) :1045-1051
[8]   MAPPING OF TURBULENT INTENSITY BY MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING [J].
GATENBY, JC ;
GORE, JC .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE SERIES B, 1994, 104 (02) :119-126
[9]   A hybrid approach for quantification of aortic valve stenosis using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and echocardiography: Comparison to right heart catheterization and standard echocardiography [J].
Haghi, D ;
Suselbeck, T ;
Fluechter, S ;
Kalmar, G ;
Schroder, M ;
Kaden, JJ ;
Poerner, T ;
Borggrefe, M ;
Papavassiliu, T .
CLINICAL RESEARCH IN CARDIOLOGY, 2006, 95 (03) :162-167
[10]   EFFECTS OF INTRAVOXEL VELOCITY DISTRIBUTIONS ON THE ACCURACY OF THE PHASE-MAPPING METHOD IN PHASE-CONTRAST MR-ANGIOGRAPHY [J].
HAMILTON, CA ;
MORAN, PR ;
SANTAGO, P ;
RAJALA, SA .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1994, 4 (05) :752-755