Complementing conventional environmental impact assessments of tourism with ecosystem service valuation: A case study of the Wulingyuan Scenic Area, China

被引:38
作者
Chen, Haojie [1 ]
机构
[1] Australian Natl Univ, Crawford Sch Publ Policy, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
关键词
Environmental impact assessments; Ecosystem service valuation; Integrated assessment; Tourism; Protected areas; NATIONAL FOREST PARK; BENEFIT TRANSFER; PROTECTED AREAS; PUBLIC-PARTICIPATION; ECONOMIC VALUE; BIODIVERSITY; RESILIENCE; CONSERVATION; GOVERNANCE; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101100
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
In order to assess environmental impacts from tourism in the Wulingyuan Scenic Area, China more thoroughly, this study complemented conventional environmental impact assessments (EIAs) with ecosystem service valuation (ESV). It did so by assessing changes in ecosystem services (ESs) and their values, based on changes in environmental components already assessed by existing conventional EIAs. The ESV method was benefit transfer. Tourism can enhance aesthetic and recreational ESs, but some existing damage to vegetation reduced ES value by $1.2 million/yr in the worst situations. While reforestation that generates ES value at $1.8 million/yr can offset the damage, the cost of existing population decline of macaque monkeys was $728 million in 2010. Potential land encroachment would cause permanent and temporary environmental costs at $0.5 million/yr and $0.09 million/yr, respectively. Nevertheless, potentially artificial soil treatment system would increase ES values by $0.25 million/yr. Surface runoff and waste gas have negligible impacts. While complementing conventional EIAs with ESV has limitations, doing so can assess environmental impacts more comprehensively, link environmental impacts to human wellbeing, and improve information. Sustainable tourism requires conserving biodiversity and culturally valuable ecosystems.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 101 条
  • [1] Alberini A., 2000, Application of the Contingent Valuation Method in Developing Countries
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1999, PRINC ENV IMP ASS BE
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2010, EC ECOSYSTEMS BIODIV
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2004, THE DPSIR FRAMEWORK
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2021, ASS AN SERV
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2005, ECOSYSTEMS HUMAN WEL
  • [7] Tourism in protected areas: Disentangling road and traffic effects on intra-guild scavenging processes
    Antonio Donazar, Jose
    Ceballos, Olga
    Cortes-Avizanda, Ainara
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 630 : 600 - 608
  • [8] Ecosystem services in environmental assessment - Help or hindrance?
    Baker, J.
    Sheate, W. R.
    Phillips, P.
    Eales, R.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2013, 40 : 3 - 13
  • [9] Ecology - Economic reasons for conserving wild nature
    Balmford, A
    Bruner, A
    Cooper, P
    Costanza, R
    Farber, S
    Green, RE
    Jenkins, M
    Jefferiss, P
    Jessamy, V
    Madden, J
    Munro, K
    Myers, N
    Naeem, S
    Paavola, J
    Rayment, M
    Rosendo, S
    Roughgarden, J
    Trumper, K
    Turner, RK
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2002, 297 (5583) : 950 - 953
  • [10] ISSUES IN ECOSYSTEM VALUATION - IMPROVING INFORMATION FOR DECISION-MAKING
    BINGHAM, G
    BISHOP, R
    BRODY, M
    BROMLEY, D
    CLARK, E
    COOPER, W
    COSTANZA, R
    HALE, T
    HAYDEN, G
    KELLERT, S
    NORGAARD, R
    NORTON, B
    PAYNE, J
    RUSSELL, C
    SUTER, G
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 1995, 14 (02) : 73 - 90