A new interactive method based on multi-criteria preference degree functions for solar power plant site selection

被引:20
作者
Ayough, Ashkan [1 ]
Boshruei, Setareh [1 ]
Khorshidvand, Behrooz [2 ]
机构
[1] Shahid Beheshti Univ, Fac Management & Accounting, Ind Management Dept, Tehran, Iran
[2] Iran Ctr Management Studies ICMS, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Renewable energy; Solar power plant; MCDM; ISAW; PROMETHEE; DECISION-ANALYSIS; GIS; WIND; PROJECTS; MCDM; AHP;
D O I
10.1016/j.renene.2022.06.087
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Solar power energy is renewable and clean energy, widely used to produce electricity. Its unique properties have led to increasing demands in many countries. In this regard, the importance of Multi -Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) in solar power plants, especially site selection problems, is increas-ingly on the rise. Thus, this study presents a new approach suited to the nature of this problem when the amount of the required investment is a critical aspect. As managers naturally cannot rely on methods that behave as a black box, this study renders a new approach that redefines the linear relations of Interactive Simple Additive Weighting (ISAW) by multi-criteria preference degree functions of Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluation (PROMETHEE). In the proposed approach, an initial order of alternatives is gradually improved by swapping the order of a pair of alternatives until the decision-maker becomes satisfied. To validate the proposed method, we consider a case study of site selection for solar farms.(c) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1165 / 1173
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A risk-based multi-criteria spatial decision analysis for solar power plant site selection in different climates: A case study in Iran
    Shorabeh, Saman Nadizadeh
    Firozjaei, Mohammad Karimi
    Nematollahi, Omid
    Firozjaei, Hamzeh Karimi
    Jelokhani-Niaraki, Mohammadreza
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2019, 143 : 958 - 973
  • [2] Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making for Solar Power Plant Location Selection
    Nhi, Thai Hoang Tuyet
    Wang, Chia-Nan
    Van Thanh, Nguyen
    CMC-COMPUTERS MATERIALS & CONTINUA, 2022, 72 (03): : 4853 - 4865
  • [3] Solar PV power plant site selection using a GIS-based non-linear multi-criteria optimization technique
    Khan, Abdullah
    Ali, Yousaf
    Pamucar, Dragan
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (20) : 57378 - 57397
  • [4] Multi-criteria decision-making in the location selection for a solar PV power plant using AHP
    Ozdemir, Seda
    Sahin, Gokhan
    MEASUREMENT, 2018, 129 : 218 - 226
  • [5] Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Approaches for Solar Power Plant Location Selection in Viet Nam
    Wang, Chia-Nan
    Van Thanh Nguyen
    Hoang Tuyet Nhi Thai
    Duy Hung Duong
    ENERGIES, 2018, 11 (06)
  • [6] Complex power-to-gas plant site selection by multi-criteria decision-making and GIS
    Soha, Tamas
    Hartmann, Balint
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT-X, 2022, 13
  • [7] A review on the applications of multi-criteria decision-making approaches for power plant site selection
    Khanlari, Amir
    Alhuyi Nazari, Mohammad
    JOURNAL OF THERMAL ANALYSIS AND CALORIMETRY, 2022, 147 (07) : 4473 - 4489
  • [8] Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods for Suitable Site Selection of Concentrating Solar Power Plants
    Farsi, Hichem
    Dizene, Rabah
    Flamant, Gilles
    Notton, Gilles
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (17)
  • [9] Optimal Solar Farm Site Selection in the George Town Conurbation Using GIS-Based Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) and NASA POWER Data
    Bandira, Puteri Nur Atiqah
    Tan, Mou Leong
    Teh, Su Yean
    Samat, Narimah
    Shaharudin, Shazlyn Milleana
    Mahamud, Mohd Amirul
    Tangang, Fredolin
    Juneng, Liew
    Chung, Jing Xiang
    Samsudin, Mohd Saiful
    ATMOSPHERE, 2022, 13 (12)
  • [10] GIS Based Multi-Criteria Analysis for Industrial Site Selection
    Rikalovic, Aleksandar
    Cosic, Ilija
    Lazarevic, Djordje
    24TH DAAAM INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING AND AUTOMATION, 2013, 2014, 69 : 1054 - 1063