The effect of tax incentives on energy intensity: Evidence from China's VAT reform

被引:55
作者
Zhou, Qianling [1 ]
Li, Tao [2 ,3 ]
Gong, Liutang [4 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Technol & Business Univ, Sch Econ, Beijing 100048, Peoples R China
[2] China Foreign Affairs Univ, Sch Int Econ, Beijing 100037, Peoples R China
[3] Guangdong Univ Foreign Studies, Res Ctr Accounting & Econ Dev Guangdong Hong Kong, Guangzhou 510420, Peoples R China
[4] Beijing Technol & Business Univ, Beijing 100048, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Energy intensity; VAT reform; Difference-in-differences estimation; Tax incentive; INVESTMENT; POLICY; DETERMINANTS; PRODUCTIVITY; PERFORMANCE; ELECTRICITY; MANAGEMENT; EFFICIENCY; IMPACT; SCALE;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2022.105887
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper examines the effect of how firms' energy intensity is affected by China's value-added tax reform, which provides permanent tax incentives for firms to invest in fixed assets. Using the difference-in-differences method, a unique firm-level data set is employed to examine the impact of VAT reform on firms' energy intensity. The results show that VAT reform significantly reduces firms' coal intensity by approximately 9%. There is a greater decrease in coal intensity for large-scale firms, firms in energy-intensive industries, and private firms after the reform. By encouraging firms to invest in fixed assets and improve output, this reform achieves an energy-saving effect. Our results shed new light on the effect of tax policy and can help inform the development of energy policies.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Big Bad Banks? The Winners and Losers from Bank Deregulation in the United States [J].
Beck, Thorsten ;
Levine, Ross ;
Levkov, Alexey .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2010, 65 (05) :1637-1667
[2]   Evidence of an "Energy-Management Gap" in US manufacturing: Spillovers from firm management practices to energy efficiency [J].
Boyd, Gale A. ;
Curtis, E. Mark .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2014, 68 (03) :463-479
[3]   Firm-level determinants of energy and carbon intensity in China [J].
Cao, Jing ;
Karplus, Valerie J. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2014, 75 :167-178
[4]   Controllable and affordable utility-scale electricity from intermittent wind resources and compressed air energy storage (CAES) [J].
Cavallo, Alfred .
ENERGY, 2007, 32 (02) :120-127
[5]  
Chen Y, 2010, EC RES J, P29
[6]   ECONOMIES OF SCALE IN UNITED-STATES ELECTRIC-POWER GENERATION [J].
CHRISTENSEN, LR ;
GREENE, WH .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1976, 84 (04) :655-676
[7]   Environmental regulation and foreign direct investment: Evidence from South Korea [J].
Chung, Sunghoon .
JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2014, 108 :222-236
[8]   Globalization, firm-level characteristics and environmental management: A study of Japan [J].
Cole, Matthew A. ;
Elliott, Robert J. R. ;
Shimamoto, Kenichi .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2006, 59 (03) :312-323
[9]   Can China's Carbon Emissions Trading Rights Mechanism Transform its Manufacturing Industry? Based on the Perspective of Enterprise Behavior [J].
Dai, Yue ;
Li, Nan ;
Gu, Rongrong ;
Zhu, Xiaodong .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (07)
[10]   Pollution abatement cost savings and FDI inflows to polluting sectors in China [J].
Di, Wenhua .
ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2007, 12 :775-798