Post-mortem CT vs necropsy in feline medicine

被引:7
作者
Ribas, Laila M. [1 ]
Massad, Mara R. R. [1 ]
Pinto, Ana C. B. C. F. [2 ]
Heng, Hock Gan [3 ]
Tremori, Talia M. [1 ]
Reis, Servio T. J. [1 ]
Baroni, Carina O. [2 ]
Massad, Eduardo [4 ]
Rocha, Noeme S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Sao Paulo State Univ, Sch Vet Med & Anim Sci, Dept Vet Clin Sci, Prof Doutor Walter Mauricio Correa S-N, BR-18618681 Botucatu, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Sch Vet Med & Anim Sci, Surg Dept, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[3] Purdue Univ, Dept Vet Clin Sci, Coll Vet Med, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[4] Fundacao Getulio Vargas, Sch Appl Math, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
关键词
Post-mortem examination; radiology; multislice computed tomography; veterinary pathology; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY; FORENSIC NECROPSY; VIRTOPSY APPROACH; AUTOPSY; RADIOLOGY; PMCT;
D O I
10.1177/1098612X20919310
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Objectives The aim of this study was to compare post-mortem CT findings with necropsy findings in domestic cats. Methods Post-mortem CT and necropsies were performed in 20 cadavers of domestic cats. The sensitivity, specificity and agreement between the post-mortem CT and necropsy findings were determined. Results There were a total of 315 post-mortem findings; 183 were identified by post-mortem CT and 132 were identified by necropsy. Post-mortem CT demonstrated a higher sensitivity to identify the findings mainly in bones. The higher indices of agreement between post-mortem CT and necropsy were related to abnormalities of pleural space, bones and joints. Conclusions and relevance This study demonstrated that post-mortem CT and necropsy provided different information. Thus, their use in conjunction with each other might improve the understanding of the cause of death and the identification of post-mortem lesions.
引用
收藏
页码:1206 / 1213
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
Allen M., 2006, British Association of Social Workers, V18, P167, DOI [10.1080/09503150600904060, DOI 10.1080/09503150600904060]
[2]   Accuracy of non-contrast PMCT for determining cause of death [J].
Ampanozi, Garyfalia ;
Thali, Yannick A. ;
Schweitzer, Wolf ;
Hatch, Gary M. ;
Ebert, Lars C. ;
Thali, Michael J. ;
Ruder, Thomas D. .
FORENSIC SCIENCE MEDICINE AND PATHOLOGY, 2017, 13 (03) :284-292
[3]   The rise of forensic and post-mortem radiology-Analysis of the literature between the year 2000 and 2011 [J].
Baglivo, Manuela ;
Winklhofer, Sebastian ;
Hatch, Gary M. ;
Ampanozi, Garyfalia ;
Thali, Michael J. ;
Ruder, Thomas D. .
JOURNAL OF FORENSIC RADIOLOGY AND IMAGING, 2013, 1 (01) :3-9
[4]   The Veterinary Forensic Necropsy: A Review of Procedures and Protocols [J].
Brownlie, H. W. Brooks ;
Munro, R. .
VETERINARY PATHOLOGY, 2016, 53 (05) :919-928
[5]   Clinical radiology and postmortem imaging (Virtopsy) are not the same: Specific and unspecific postmortem signs [J].
Christe, Andreas ;
Flach, Patricia ;
Ross, Steffen ;
Spendlove, Danny ;
Bolliger, Stephan ;
Vock, Peter ;
Thali, Michael J. .
LEGAL MEDICINE, 2010, 12 (05) :215-222
[6]   Abdominal Trauma-Sensitivity and Specificity of Postmortem Noncontrast Imaging Findings Compared With Autopsy Findings [J].
Christe, Andreas ;
Ross, Steffen ;
Oesterhelweg, Lars ;
Spendlove, Danny ;
Bolliger, Stephan ;
Vock, Peter ;
Thali, Michael J. .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2009, 66 (05) :1302-1307
[7]   Postmortem computed tomography angiography vs. conventional autopsy: advantages and inconveniences of each method [J].
Christine, Chevallier ;
Francesco, Doenz ;
Paul, Vaucher ;
Cristian, Palmiere ;
Alejandro, Dominguez ;
Stefano, Binaghi ;
Patrice, Mangin ;
Silke, Grabherr .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LEGAL MEDICINE, 2013, 127 (05) :981-989
[8]  
Pinto ACBDF, 2017, J FORENSIC RADIOL IM, V8, P48, DOI 10.1016/j.jofri.2017.03.006
[9]  
Pinto ACBDF, 2017, J FORENSIC RADIOL IM, V8, P45, DOI 10.1016/j.jofri.2016.11.006
[10]   Non-accidental injuries found in necropsies of domestic cats: a review of 191 cases [J].
de Siqueira, Adriana ;
Cassiano, Fabiana Cecilia ;
de Albuquerque Landi, Marina Frota ;
Marlet, Elza Fernandes ;
Maiorka, Paulo Cesar .
JOURNAL OF FELINE MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2012, 14 (10) :723-728