Subjective confidence in one's answers: The consensuality principle

被引:129
作者
Koriat, Asher [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Haifa, Dept Psychol, IL-31905 Haifa, Israel
关键词
subjective confidence; metacognition; probabilistic mental models; consensuality; confidence-accuracy relationship;
D O I
10.1037/0278-7393.34.4.945
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
In answering general-information questions, a within-person confidence-accuracy (C-A) correlation is typically observed,. suggesting that people can monitor the correctness of their knowledge. However, because the correct answer is generally the consensual answer-the one endorsed by most participants-confidence judgment may actually monitor the consensuality of the answer rather than its correctness. Indeed, the C-A correlation was positive for items with a consensually correct answer but negative for items with a consensually wrong answer. Results suggest that the consensuality-confidence correlation may be mediated by 2 internal mnemonic cues that are correlated with consensuality: Consensual answers are reached faster and are selected more consistently by the same person on different occasions than nonconsensual answers. The results argue against a direct-access view of confidence judgments and suggest that such judgments will be accurate only as long as people's responses are by and large correct across the sampled items, thus stressing the criticality of a representative design.
引用
收藏
页码:945 / 959
页数:15
相关论文
共 95 条
[1]   REALISM OF CONFIDENCE JUDGMENTS [J].
ADAMS, JK ;
ADAMS, PA .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1961, 68 (01) :33-45
[2]   Overcoming intuition: Metacognitive difficulty activates analytic reasoning [J].
Alter, Adam L. ;
Oppenheimer, Daniel M. ;
Epley, Nicholas ;
Eyre, Rebecca N. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2007, 136 (04) :569-576
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1982, Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
[4]   THE CALIBRATION AND RESOLUTION OF CONFIDENCE IN PERCEPTUAL JUDGMENTS [J].
BARANSKI, JV ;
PETRUSIC, WM .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1994, 55 (04) :412-428
[5]  
Barnes AE, 1999, ATTENTION PERFORM, V17, P287
[6]   MEMORY PREDICTIONS ARE BASED ON EASE OF PROCESSING [J].
BEGG, I ;
DUFT, S ;
LALONDE, P ;
MELNICK, R ;
SANVITO, J .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1989, 28 (05) :610-632
[7]  
Benjamin A. S., 1996, Implicit Memory and Metacognition, P309, DOI 10.4324/9781315806136
[8]   The mismeasure of memory: When retrieval fluency is misleading as a metamnemonic index [J].
Benjamin, AS ;
Bjork, RA ;
Schwartz, BL .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 1998, 127 (01) :55-68
[9]   CORRELATION OF EYEWITNESS ACCURACY AND CONFIDENCE - OPTIMALITY HYPOTHESIS REVISITED [J].
BOTHWELL, RK ;
BRIGHAM, JC ;
DEFFENBACHER, KA .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1987, 72 (04) :691-695
[10]   Confidence and accuracy in the recall of deceptive and nondeceptive sentences [J].
Brewer, WF ;
Sampaio, C ;
Barlow, MR .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2005, 52 (04) :618-627