On Pareto Local Optimal Solutions Networks

被引:25
作者
Liefooghe, Arnaud [1 ,2 ]
Derbel, Bilel [1 ,2 ]
Verel, Sebastien [3 ]
Lopez-Ibanez, Manuel [4 ]
Aguirre, Hernan [5 ]
Tanaka, Kiyoshi [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lille, CNRS, Cent Lille, UMR 9189,CRIStAL, F-59000 Lille, France
[2] Inria Lille Nord Europe, F-59650 Villeneuve Dascq, France
[3] Univ Littoral Cote dOpale, LISIC, F-62100 Calais, France
[4] Univ Manchester, Alliance Manchester Business Sch, Manchester, Lancs, England
[5] Shinshu Univ, Fac Engn, Nagano, Japan
来源
PARALLEL PROBLEM SOLVING FROM NATURE - PPSN XV, PT II | 2018年 / 11102卷
关键词
D O I
10.1007/978-3-319-99259-4_19
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Pareto local optimal solutions (PLOS) are believed to highly influence the dynamics and the performance of multi-objective optimization algorithms, especially those based on local search and Pareto dominance. A number of studies so far have investigated their impact on the difficulty of searching the landscape underlying a problem instance. However, the community still lacks knowledge on the structure of PLOS and the way it impacts the effectiveness of multi-objective algorithms. Inspired by the work on local optima networks in single-objective optimization, we introduce a PLOS network (PLOS-net) model as a step toward the fundamental understanding of multi-objective landscapes and search algorithms. Using a comprehensive set of rho mnk-landscapes, PLOS-nets are constructed by full enumeration, and selected network features are further extracted and analyzed with respect to instance characteristics. A correlation and regression analysis is then conducted to capture the importance of the PLOS-net features on the runtime and effectiveness of two prototypical Pareto-based heuristics. In particular, we are able to provide empirical evidence for the relevance of the PLOS-net model to explain algorithm performance. For instance, the degree of connectedness in the PLOS-net is shown to play an even more important role than the number of PLOS in the landscape.
引用
收藏
页码:232 / 244
页数:13
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1993, The Origins of Order
[2]  
Borges P., 1998, IMMREP19988 TU DENM
[3]   Random forests [J].
Breiman, L .
MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) :5-32
[4]  
Daolio F, 2017, EVOL COMPUT, V25, P555, DOI [10.1162/evco_a_00193, 10.1162/EVCO_a_00193]
[5]   Local Optima Networks and the Performance of Iterated Local Search [J].
Daolio, Fabio ;
Verel, Sebastien ;
Ochoa, Gabriela ;
Tomassini, Marco .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE FOURTEENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GENETIC AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION CONFERENCE, 2012, :369-376
[6]  
Deb K., 2001, MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIM, DOI DOI 10.1109/TEVC.2002.804322
[7]   Network topology of a potential energy landscape: A static scale-free network [J].
Doye, JPK .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2002, 88 (23) :4-238701
[8]   Towards Analyzing Multimodality of Continuous Multiobjective Landscapes [J].
Kerschke, Pascal ;
Wang, Hao ;
Preuss, Mike ;
Grimme, Christian ;
Deutz, Andre ;
Trautmann, Heike ;
Emmerich, Michael .
PARALLEL PROBLEM SOLVING FROM NATURE - PPSN XIV, 2016, 9921 :962-972
[9]  
Knowles J., 2002, Soft Computing Systems, P271
[10]   Running time analysis of evolutionary algorithms on a simplified multiobjective knapsack problem [J].
Laumanns M. ;
Thiele M. ;
Zitzler E. .
Natural Computing, 2004, 3 (1) :37-51