Efficacy of Interventions Promoting Blood Donation: A Systematic Review

被引:62
作者
Godin, Gaston [1 ]
Vezina-Im, Lydi-Anne
Belanger-Gravel, Ariane
Amireault, Steve
机构
[1] Univ Laval, Canada Res Chair Behav & Hlth, Quebec City, PQ G1V 0A6, Canada
关键词
DONOR RECRUITMENT; BEHAVIOR; DETERMINANTS; DOOR; RETENTION; FREQUENCY; REWARDS; TENSION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.tmrv.2011.10.001
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Findings about the efficacy of interventions promoting blood donation are scattered and sometime inconsistent. The aim of the present systematic review was to identify the most effective types of interventions and modes of delivery to increase blood donation. The following databases were investigated: MEDLINE/PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL, EMBASE, and Proquest Dissertations and Theses. Additional studies were also included by checking the references of the articles included in the review and by looking at our personal collection. The outcomes of interest were either blood drive attendance or blood donations. A total of 29 randomized controlled trials or quasi-experimental studies were included in the review, detailing 36 interventions tested among independent samples. Interventions targeting psychosocial cognitions (s = 8, s to represent the number of independent samples; odds ratio [OR], 2.47; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.42-4.28), those stressing the altruistic motives to give blood (s = 4; OR, 3.89; 95% CI, 1.03-14.76), and reminders (s = 7; OR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.22-2.99) were the most successful in increasing blood donation. The results suggest that motivational interventions and reminders are the most effective in increasing blood donation, but additional studies are needed to evaluate the efficacy of other types of interventions. (c) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:224 / 237
页数:14
相关论文
共 72 条
[61]   A SOCIAL-LEARNING APPROACH TO INCREASING BLOOD DONATIONS [J].
SARASON, IG ;
SARASON, BR ;
PIERCE, GR ;
SHEARIN, EN ;
SAYERS, MH .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 21 (11) :896-918
[62]  
Schulz KF, 2010, ANN INTERN MED, V152, P726, DOI 10.7326/0003-4819-152-11-201006010-00232
[63]  
Schwartz S.H., 1997, Advances in experimental social psychology, V10, P221, DOI [10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60358-5, DOI 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60358-5, 10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60358-5]
[64]  
Sheeran P., 2002, EUR REV SOC PSYCHOL, V12, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1080/14792772143000003, 10.1080/14792772143000003]
[65]   An adapted postdonation motivational interview enhances blood donor retention [J].
Sinclair, Kadian S. ;
Campbell, Tavis S. ;
Carey, Patricia M. ;
Langevin, Eric ;
Bowser, Brent ;
France, Christopher R. .
TRANSFUSION, 2010, 50 (08) :1778-1786
[66]   Empirical assessment of effect of publication bias on meta-analyses [J].
Sutton, AJ ;
Duval, SJ ;
Tweedie, RL ;
Abrams, KR ;
Jones, DR .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 320 (7249) :1574-1577
[67]  
Titmuss RM., 1970, GIFT RELATIONSHIP HU
[68]  
Upton W. E., 1973, Altruism, attribution, and intrinsic motivation in the recruitment of blood donors
[69]   Does changing behavioral intentions engender bahaviour change? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence [J].
Webb, TL ;
Sheeran, P .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2006, 132 (02) :249-268
[70]   Using an integrated automated system to optimize retention and increase frequency of blood donations [J].
Whitney, J. Garrett ;
Hall, Robert F. .
TRANSFUSION, 2010, 50 (07) :1618-1624