Combined Foley's catheter with vaginal misoprostol for pre-induction cervical ripening: A randomised controlled trial

被引:22
作者
Aduloju, Olusola P. [1 ]
Akintayo, Akinyemi A. [1 ]
Adanikin, Abiodun I. [1 ]
Ade-Ojo, Idowu P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ekiti State Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Ado Ekiti, Nigeria
关键词
cervical ripening; Foley's catheter; induction of labour; misoprostol; Nigeria; LABOR INDUCTION; INTRAVAGINAL MISOPROSTOL; ORAL MISOPROSTOL; DINOPROSTONE; OXYTOCIN; METAANALYSIS; COMBINATION; BALLOON; TERM;
D O I
10.1111/ajo.12489
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BackgroundPre-induction cervical ripening greatly influences the outcome of induction of labour (IOL). AimsTo compare the efficacy of combined Foley's catheter and vaginal misoprostol with Foley's catheter or low-dose vaginal misoprostol alone for cervical ripening. Materials and methodsWomen with a singleton pregnancy admitted at term for cervical ripening and IOL based on clinical indication were randomised into three groups. Oxytocin augmentation was done in the groups as indicated. Significant tests were done using chi square, Fisher's exact and analysis of variance tests. ResultsA total of 210 women were randomised into the study. Women in the combined group (Foley's catheter and vaginal misoprostol) had significantly higher postcervical ripening Bishop's score than the women in the other two groups; P = 0.001. Cervical ripening time, induction-delivery time and cervical ripening-delivery interval were significantly shorter in the combined group compared to the other two groups; P = 0.001. Also, women in the combined group required significantly lesser oxytocin augmentation than the other two groups; P = 0.001. There was no difference in Apgar scores at 1 or 5 minutes or in special baby care unit admission among the groups. There were no reported cases of uterine contractile abnormalities or rupture in this study. ConclusionCombined Foley's catheter and vaginal misoprostol provide a shorter duration to the achievement of cervical ripening.
引用
收藏
页码:578 / 584
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   A randomized comparison of oral misoprostol versus Foley catheter and oxytocin for induction of labor at term [J].
Abramovici, D ;
Goldwasser, S ;
Mabie, BC ;
Mercer, BM ;
Goldwasser, R ;
Sibai, BM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1999, 181 (05) :1108-1112
[2]  
ACOG, 1995, AM COLL OBSTET GYNEC, V217, P1
[3]   Intravaginal misoprostol versus transcervical Foley catheter in pre-induction cervical ripening [J].
Adeniji, AO ;
Olayemi, O ;
Odukogbe, AA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2006, 92 (02) :130-132
[4]  
Adeniji O A, 2005, J Obstet Gynaecol, V25, P134
[5]   Intravaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter for cervical ripening and induction of labor [J].
Afolabi, BB ;
Oyeneyin, OL ;
Ogedengbe, OK .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2005, 89 (03) :263-267
[6]   Induction of labor in prolonged pregnancy with unfavorable cervix: comparison of sequential intracervical Foley catheter-intravaginal misoprostol and intravaginal misoprostol alone [J].
Ande, A. Babatunde ;
Ezeanochie, C. Michael ;
Olagbuji, N. Biodun .
ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2012, 285 (04) :967-971
[7]   Cervical ripening and induction of labor with misoprostol, dinoprostone gel, and a Foley catheter: A randomized trial of 3 techniques [J].
Barrilleaux, PS ;
Bofill, JA ;
Terrone, DA ;
Magann, EF ;
May, WL ;
Morrison, JC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 186 (06) :1124-1129
[8]   A randomized comparison between misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction in patients with unfavorable cervices [J].
Buser, D ;
Mora, G ;
Arias, F .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1997, 89 (04) :581-585
[9]   A prospective randomized controlled trial that compared misoprostol, Foley catheter, and combination misoprostol-Foley catheter for labor induction [J].
Chung, JH ;
Huang, WH ;
Rumney, PJ ;
Garite, TJ ;
Nageotte, MP .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 189 (04) :1031-1035
[10]   A randomized trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter with concurrent oxytocin for labor induction in nulliparous women [J].
Culver, J ;
Strauss, RA ;
Brody, S ;
Dorman, K ;
Timlin, S ;
McMahon, MJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2004, 21 (03) :139-146