Aeration of large-scale municipal wastewater treatment plants: state of the art

被引:248
作者
Rosso, Diego [1 ]
Larson, Lory E. [2 ]
Stenstrom, Michael K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] CSBU, Irwindale, CA 91706 USA
关键词
activated sludge; aeration; alpha; efficiency; oxygen transfer; wastewater;
D O I
10.2166/wst.2008.218
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Aeration is the most energy-intensive operation in wastewater treatment, amounting to 45-75% of plant energy costs. Fine-pore diffusers are today almost ubiquitous in municipal wastewater aeration, due to their advantageous aeration efficiency (mass of oxygen transferred per unit energy required). Nevertheless, older municipal treatment facilities and many industrial treatment plants are still equipped with coarse-bubble or surface aerators. Fine-pore diffusers are subject to two major disadvantages: a) fouling, if not cleaned periodically; b) decrease in oxygen transfer efficiency caused by dissolved surfactants. Coarse-bubble and surface aerators are typically not subject to the traditional problems affecting fine-pore diffusers. Nonetheless, they achieve oxygen transfer at the expense of increased energy intensity. The increased biomass concentration associated with high mean cell retention time (MCRT) operations has a beneficial effect on aeration. Nutrient-removing selectors are able to further increase aeration efficiency, as they sorb and utilize the readily available substrate which otherwise would accumulate at bubble surfaces and dramatically decrease aeration efficiency. We summarise here our 30-year long experience in aeration research, and results obtained with clean-and process-water tests are used to show the beneficial effects of high MCRT operations, the beneficial effect of selectors, and the decline of aeration efficiency due to dissolved surfactants.
引用
收藏
页码:973 / 978
页数:6
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
*AM SOC CIV ENG, 1997, STAND GUID IN PROC O
[2]  
ASCE, 2007, MEAS OX TRANSF CLEAN
[3]  
ECKENFELDER WW, 1968, NEW CONCEPTS OXYGEN
[4]   Effect of anaerobic and anoxic selectors on oxygen transfer in wastewater [J].
Fisher, MJ ;
Boyle, WC .
WATER ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH, 1999, 71 (01) :84-93
[5]   COMPARISON OF AERATION EQUIPMENT UNDER OPERATING-CONDITIONS [J].
FREY, W .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1991, 24 (07) :43-45
[6]   Application of the off-gas method to the measurement of oxygen transfer in biofilters [J].
Gillot, S ;
Kies, F ;
Amiel, C ;
Roustan, M ;
Héduit, A .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2005, 60 (22) :6336-6345
[7]   The effect of an initial anaerobic zone on the nutrient requirements of activated sludge [J].
Harper, WF ;
Jenkins, D .
WATER ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH, 2003, 75 (03) :216-224
[8]   Case study of aeration performance under changing process conditions [J].
Iranpour, R ;
Shao, YJ ;
Ahring, BK ;
Stenstrom, MK .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 2002, 128 (06) :562-569
[9]   Fine-pore aeration diffusers: Accelerated membrane ageing studies [J].
Kaliman, An ;
Rosso, Diego ;
Leu, Shao-Yuan ;
Stenstrom, Michael K. .
WATER RESEARCH, 2008, 42 (1-2) :467-475
[10]  
KAYSER R, 1979, PROG WATER TECHNOL, V11, P23