The Cross-technique for single-incision pediatric endosurgical pyloromyotomy

被引:11
|
作者
Muensterer, Oliver J. [1 ,2 ]
Chong, Albert J. [2 ]
Georgeson, Keith E. [2 ]
Harmon, Carroll M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Weill Cornell Med Coll, Div Pediat Surg, New York, NY 10021 USA
[2] Univ Alabama, Dept Surg, Childrens Hosp Alabama, Div Pediat Surg, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2011年 / 25卷 / 10期
关键词
Single-incision; Laparoscopy; Pyloromyotomy; Infant; Cross-technique; LAPAROSCOPIC PYLOROMYOTOMY; PYLORIC-STENOSIS; LEARNING-CURVE; EXPERIENCE; METAANALYSIS; INSTITUTION; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-011-1677-2
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Single-incision pediatric endosurgical (SIPES) pyloromyotomy is frequently used for the treatment of hypertrophic pyloric stenosis at our center. Our initial SIPES approach mirrored the conventional, triangulated laparoscopic pyloromyotomy. Because an increased number of perforations were noted on our initial analysis, a more straightforward Cross-technique SIPES pyloromyotomy was developed. This study compares the current Cross-technique SIPES pyloromyotomy to the previous standard SIPES operation. Methods The Cross-technique entails grasping the antrum with the surgeon's left hand instrument, retracting toward the left lower quadrant, and thereby orienting the pylorus obliquely toward the right upper quadrant. The serosal incision and muscular spreading is accomplished using a right-hand instrument that crosses over the left hand grasper. Demographic variables, operative times, estimated blood loss (EBL), complications, conversion rate, and postoperative length of stay were compared. Results Twenty-nine Cross-technique patients were compared with 23 in the standard group. The Cross-technique was faster than the standard procedure (21 +/- A 5 vs. 27 +/- A 12 min, p = 0.03) and EBL was lower (1.3 +/- A 0.5 vs. 1.7 +/- A 0.6 ml, p = 0.02). There were two mucosal perforations requiring conversions to triangulated 3-access-site laparoscopy in the standard, and one conversion to open surgery in the Cross-technique group. Patients who underwent cross-technique pyloromyotomy weighed less (3.6 +/- A 0.6 vs. 4.0 +/- A 0.5 kg, p = 0.012), but there were no differences in age, gender ratio, conversion rate, or length of stay. There was one postoperative wound infection in the cross-technique, but none in the standard group. No patients required reoperation. All participating surgeons felt that the cross-technique was more ergonomic and easier to perform than the standard SIPES technique. Conclusions The Cross-technique appears superior to standard SIPES pyloromyotomy and should be preferentially used for single-incision endosurgical pyloromyotomy for hypertrophic pyloric stenosis.
引用
收藏
页码:3414 / 3418
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Single-incision laparoscopic surgery for cholecystectomy: an evolving technique
    Andre Chow
    Sanjay Purkayastha
    Omer Aziz
    Paraskevas Paraskeva
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2010, 24 : 709 - 714
  • [32] Risk factors for prolonged operative time in single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    Cheon, Seong Uk
    Moon, Ju Ik
    Choi, In Seok
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL TREATMENT AND RESEARCH, 2015, 89 (05) : 247 - 253
  • [33] Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC): a refined technique
    Hawasli, Abdelkader
    Kandeel, Ahmed
    Meguid, Ahmed
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2010, 199 (03) : 289 - 293
  • [34] Single-incision robotic cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    Sun, Ning
    Zhang, Jia Lin
    Zhang, Cheng Shuo
    Li, Xiao Hang
    Shi, Yue
    MEDICINE, 2018, 97 (36)
  • [35] A comparison of robotic single-incision and traditional single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    Gustafson, Monica
    Lescouflair, Tariq
    Kimball, Randall
    Daoud, Ibrahim
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2016, 30 (06): : 2276 - 2280
  • [36] Single-incision laparoscopic surgery for cholecystectomy: an evolving technique
    Chow, Andre
    Purkayastha, Sanjay
    Aziz, Omer
    Paraskeva, Paraskevas
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2010, 24 (03): : 709 - 714
  • [37] Is It Safe for Trainees to Perform Single-Incision Pediatric Endosurgery Splenectomy?
    Raboei, Enaam
    Owiwi, Yazeed
    Ghallab, Alaa
    Zeinelabdeen, Ali
    Alsaggaf, Ameen
    Zaidan, Mazen
    Fayez, Mohamed
    Alawi, Ahmad
    Atta, Ahmed
    Al Fageeh, Ahmad
    Al Fifi, Khalid
    Al Sayegh, Murad
    Banaja, Abdulaziz
    Haddad, Amani
    Al Nefai, Ziyad
    Aloufi, Turki
    Alghamdi, Shaima
    Abdulrahim, Ibrahim
    Al Manea, Aljawhara
    Alharbi, Ibrahim
    Sait, Atef
    Fallatah, Reemah
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2019, 29 (03): : 420 - 423
  • [38] Transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy
    Zhao, Lei
    Kong, Xiangke
    Li, Jun
    Huang, Lan
    Xia, Chunmei
    Xu, Jun
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 45 (03) : 888 - 889
  • [39] Single-Incision Laparoscopic Total Colectomy
    Paranjape, Charudutt
    Ojo, Oluwatosin J.
    Carne, David
    Guyton, Daniel
    JSLS-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SURGEONS, 2012, 16 (01) : 27 - 32
  • [40] Single-incision bilateral laparoscopic oophorectomy
    Bhandarkar, Deepraj
    Katara, Avinash
    Deshmane, Vinay
    Mittal, Gaurav
    Udwadia, Tehemton E.
    JOURNAL OF MINIMAL ACCESS SURGERY, 2011, 7 (01) : 87 - 89