Pramipexole Increases Go Timeouts but Not No-go Errors in Healthy Volunteers

被引:6
作者
Yang, Xue Qing [1 ]
Glizer, Daniel [1 ]
Vo, Andrew [1 ]
Seergobin, Ken N. [1 ]
MacDonald, Penny A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Ontario, Brain & Mind Inst, MacDonald Lab, London, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Western Ontario, Schulich Sch Med & Dent, Clin Neurol Sci, London, ON, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
pramipexole; motor impulsivity; Go No-go task; healthy subjects; basal ganglia; striatum; RESTLESS LEGS SYNDROME; IMPULSE CONTROL DISORDERS; DOPAMINE AGONIST THERAPY; PARKINSONS-DISEASE; DORSAL STRIATUM; RESPONSE-INHIBITION; COGNITIVE FUNCTION; GO/NO-GO; ENDOCRINE FUNCTIONS; CLINICAL-FEATURES;
D O I
10.3389/fnhum.2016.00523
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Parkinson's disease (PD) is characterized by motor symptoms, such as resting tremor, bradykinesia and rigidity, but also features non-motor complications. PD patients taking dopaminergic therapy, such as levodopa but especially dopamine agonists (DAs), evidence an increase in impulse control disorders (ICDs), suggesting a link between dopaminergic therapy and impulsive pursuit of pleasurable activities. However, impulsivity is a multifaceted construct. Motor impulsivity refers to the inability to overcome automatic responses or cancel pre-potent responses. Previous research has suggested that PD patients, on dopaminergic medications, have decreased motor impulsivity. Whether effects on impulsivity are main effects of dopaminergic therapies or are specific to PD is unclear. Using a Go No-go task, we investigated the effect of a single dose of the DA pramipexole on motor impulsivity in healthy participants. The Go No-go task consisted of Go trials, for which keystroke responses were made as quickly as possible, and lesser frequency No-go trials, on which motor responses were to be inhibited. We hypothesized that pramipexole would decrease motor impulsivity. This would manifest as: (a) fewer No-go errors (i.e., fewer responses on trials in which a response ought to have been inhibited); and (b) more timed-out Go trials (i.e., more trials on which the deadline elapsed before a decision to make a keystroke occurred). Healthy volunteers were treated with either 0.5 mg of pramipexole or a standard placebo (randomly determined). During the 2-h wait period, they completed demographic, cognitive, physiological and affective measures. The pramipexole group had significantly more Go timeouts (p < 0.05) compared to the placebo group though they did not differ in percent of No-go errors. In contrast to its effect on pursuit of pleasurable activities, pramipexole did not increase motor impulsivity. In fact, in line with findings in PD and addiction, dopaminergic therapy might increase motor impulse control. In these patient groups, by enhancing function of the dorsal striatum (DS) of the basal ganglia in contrast to its effect on impulsive pursuit of pleasurable activities. These findings have implications for use and effects of pramipexole in PD as well as in other conditions (e.g., restless leg, dystonia, depression, addiction-related problems).
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Localizing performance of go/no-go tasks to prefrontal cortical subregions [J].
Chikazoe, Junichi .
CURRENT OPINION IN PSYCHIATRY, 2010, 23 (03) :267-272
[32]   Existence and Control of Go/No-Go Decision Transition Threshold in the Striatum [J].
Bahuguna, Jyotika ;
Aertsen, Ad ;
Kumar, Arvind .
PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, 2015, 11 (04)
[33]   Efficiency of Go/No-Go Task Performance Implemented in the Left Hemisphere [J].
Hirose, Satoshi ;
Chikazoe, Junichi ;
Watanabe, Takamitsu ;
Jimura, Koji ;
Kunimatsu, Akira ;
Abe, Osamu ;
Ohtomo, Kuni ;
Miyashita, Yasushi ;
Konishi, Seiki .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2012, 32 (26) :9059-9065
[34]   Action Interpretation Determines the Effects of Go/No-Go and Approach/ Avoidance Actions on Food Choice [J].
Chen, Zhang ;
VAN Dessel, Pieter ;
Serverius, Jordi ;
Zhu, Daxun ;
Figner, Bernd .
JOURNAL OF COGNITION, 2025, 8 (01)
[35]   Relationship between go/no-go task, physical activity, and physical fitness in preschool children [J].
Watanabe, Noriaki ;
Kamijo, Masayoshi ;
Ashida, Kazuki ;
Sasamori, Fumihito ;
Okuhara, Masao ;
Terasawa, Koji .
DISCOVER PSYCHOLOGY, 2025, 5 (01)
[36]   Zooming in on the Cause of the Perceptual Load Effect in the Go/No-Go Paradigm [J].
Chen, Zhe ;
Cave, Kyle R. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2016, 42 (08) :1072-1087
[37]   Modeling Individual Differences in the Go/No-Go Task With a Diffusion Model [J].
Ratcliff, Roger ;
Huang-Pollock, Cynthia ;
McKoon, Gail .
DECISION-WASHINGTON, 2018, 5 (01) :42-62
[38]   Mouse Tracking to Explore Motor Inhibition Processes in Go/No-Go and Stop Signal Tasks [J].
Benedetti, Viola ;
Gavazzi, Gioele ;
Giovannelli, Fabio ;
Bravi, Riccardo ;
Giganti, Fiorenza ;
Minciacchi, Diego ;
Mascalchi, Mario ;
Cincotta, Massimo ;
Viggiano, Maria Pia .
BRAIN SCIENCES, 2020, 10 (07) :1-15
[39]   The role of the prefrontal cortex in the go/no-go task in humans: a positron emission tomography study [J].
Gondo, Y ;
Shimonaka, T ;
Senda, M ;
Mishina, M ;
Toyama, H .
JAPANESE PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2000, 42 (01) :36-44
[40]   Timing of response differentiation in human motor cortex during a speeded Go/No-Go task [J].
Bolton, David A. E. ;
Vesia, Michael ;
Lakhani, Bimal ;
Staines, W. Richard ;
McIlroy, William E. .
NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH, 2014, 85 :65-68