Pramipexole Increases Go Timeouts but Not No-go Errors in Healthy Volunteers

被引:6
|
作者
Yang, Xue Qing [1 ]
Glizer, Daniel [1 ]
Vo, Andrew [1 ]
Seergobin, Ken N. [1 ]
MacDonald, Penny A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Ontario, Brain & Mind Inst, MacDonald Lab, London, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Western Ontario, Schulich Sch Med & Dent, Clin Neurol Sci, London, ON, Canada
来源
FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE | 2016年 / 10卷
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
pramipexole; motor impulsivity; Go No-go task; healthy subjects; basal ganglia; striatum; RESTLESS LEGS SYNDROME; IMPULSE CONTROL DISORDERS; DOPAMINE AGONIST THERAPY; PARKINSONS-DISEASE; DORSAL STRIATUM; RESPONSE-INHIBITION; COGNITIVE FUNCTION; GO/NO-GO; ENDOCRINE FUNCTIONS; CLINICAL-FEATURES;
D O I
10.3389/fnhum.2016.00523
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Parkinson's disease (PD) is characterized by motor symptoms, such as resting tremor, bradykinesia and rigidity, but also features non-motor complications. PD patients taking dopaminergic therapy, such as levodopa but especially dopamine agonists (DAs), evidence an increase in impulse control disorders (ICDs), suggesting a link between dopaminergic therapy and impulsive pursuit of pleasurable activities. However, impulsivity is a multifaceted construct. Motor impulsivity refers to the inability to overcome automatic responses or cancel pre-potent responses. Previous research has suggested that PD patients, on dopaminergic medications, have decreased motor impulsivity. Whether effects on impulsivity are main effects of dopaminergic therapies or are specific to PD is unclear. Using a Go No-go task, we investigated the effect of a single dose of the DA pramipexole on motor impulsivity in healthy participants. The Go No-go task consisted of Go trials, for which keystroke responses were made as quickly as possible, and lesser frequency No-go trials, on which motor responses were to be inhibited. We hypothesized that pramipexole would decrease motor impulsivity. This would manifest as: (a) fewer No-go errors (i.e., fewer responses on trials in which a response ought to have been inhibited); and (b) more timed-out Go trials (i.e., more trials on which the deadline elapsed before a decision to make a keystroke occurred). Healthy volunteers were treated with either 0.5 mg of pramipexole or a standard placebo (randomly determined). During the 2-h wait period, they completed demographic, cognitive, physiological and affective measures. The pramipexole group had significantly more Go timeouts (p < 0.05) compared to the placebo group though they did not differ in percent of No-go errors. In contrast to its effect on pursuit of pleasurable activities, pramipexole did not increase motor impulsivity. In fact, in line with findings in PD and addiction, dopaminergic therapy might increase motor impulse control. In these patient groups, by enhancing function of the dorsal striatum (DS) of the basal ganglia in contrast to its effect on impulsive pursuit of pleasurable activities. These findings have implications for use and effects of pramipexole in PD as well as in other conditions (e.g., restless leg, dystonia, depression, addiction-related problems).
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Dopaminergic Therapy Increases Go Timeouts in the Go/No-Go Task in Patients with Parkinson's Disease
    Yang, Xue Q.
    Lauzon, Brian
    Seergobin, Ken N.
    MacDonald, Penny A.
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2018, 11
  • [2] Go or no-go? An assessment of inhibitory control training using the GO/NO-GO task in adolescents
    van Royen, Annelies
    van Malderen, Eva
    Desmeta, Maurane
    Goossens, Lien
    Verbeken, Sandra
    Kemps, Eva
    APPETITE, 2022, 179
  • [3] Sex Differences on the Go/No-Go Test of Inhibition
    Sjoberg, Espen A.
    Cole, Geoff G.
    ARCHIVES OF SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, 2018, 47 (02) : 537 - 542
  • [4] A model of the Go/No-Go task
    Gomez, Pablo
    Perea, Manuel
    Ratcliff, Roger
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2007, 136 (03) : 389 - 413
  • [5] The characteristics of no-go potentials with intraepidermal stimulation
    Nakata, Hiroki
    Sakamoto, Kiwako
    Inui, Koji
    Hoshiyama, Minoru
    Kakigi, Ryusuke
    NEUROREPORT, 2009, 20 (13) : 1149 - 1154
  • [6] Optimal go/no-go ratios to maximize false alarms
    Young, Michael E.
    Sutherland, Steven C.
    McCoy, Anthony W.
    BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2018, 50 (03) : 1020 - 1029
  • [7] Valuation of Go Stimuli or Devaluation of No-Go Stimuli? Evidence of an Increased Preference for Attended Go Stimuli Following a Go/No-Go Task
    Inoue, Kazuya
    Sato, Nobuya
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 8
  • [8] Testing Go/No-Go training effects on implicit evaluations of unhealthy and healthy snack foods
    Wittleder, Sandra
    Reinelt, Tilman
    Milanowski, Luica
    Viglione, Clare
    Jay, Melanie
    Oettingen, Gabriele
    PSYCHOLOGY & HEALTH, 2024, 39 (05) : 573 - 593
  • [9] Characteristics of No-go-P300 component during somatosensory Go/No-go paradigms
    Nakata, Hiroki
    Sakamoto, Kiwako
    Kakigi, Ryusuke
    NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 2010, 478 (03) : 124 - 127
  • [10] Reorienting the Mind: The Impact of Novel Sounds on Go/No-Go Performance
    Leiva, Alicia
    Parmentier, Fabrice B. R.
    Elchlepp, Heike
    Verbruggen, Frederick
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2015, 41 (05) : 1197 - 1202